GFX Benchmark site confirms 14MP rear shooter for Lumia 1330

GFX Benchmark site confirms 14MP rear shooter for Lumia 1330
About a week ago, we told you about a sequel to the Nokia Lumia 1320 phablet. Possibly named the Lumia 1330 (RM-1062), the handset just paid a visit to the GFX Benchmark site where we learned much about the phone. The Lumia 1330 features a 5.7-inch screen with resolution of 720 x 1280. A quad-core Snapdragon 400 CPU is driving the device, which features the Adreno 305 GPU, 512MB of RAM and 32GB of native storage. A 14MP snapper adorns the rear of the device, while a 5MP front-facing "selfie" camera is found on the front of the phone.

We also learned more about the handset when two variants of it visited the FCC. The RM-1066 and RM-1067 are both different versions of the Lumia 1330 that met with the U.S. agency for certification. The former is a single SIM version of the handset, while the latter supports dual SIM cards.

Considering that the device has visited the FCC, and has been put through the GFX Benchmark site, it would appear that it won't be too long before the Lumia 1330 sees the light of day. According to Windows Phone cross promotion network AdDuplex, the Lumia 1330 includes model numbers RM-1062, RM-1063, RM-1064, RM-1065, RM-1066 and RM-1067.

via: NPU



1. MahmoudHamsharii

Posts: 70; Member since: Aug 28, 2013

0.38 giga ram?

27. mafiaprinc3

Posts: 585; Member since: May 07, 2012

0.38 is the amount of ram available at the time of the screenshot. It has 1gb of ram

2. Guaire

Posts: 890; Member since: Oct 15, 2014

0.38GB memory indicates that device has 512MB RAM not 1GB.

6. DogeShibe

Posts: 1121; Member since: Jan 10, 2014

And it also indicates that this is just a test built and not a final version.

15. hurrycanger

Posts: 1766; Member since: Dec 01, 2013

And this should be true. Otherwise it's gonna suck badly.

20. akki20892

Posts: 3902; Member since: Feb 04, 2013

Don't worry, We will see 1GB....

3. yahia_malka

Posts: 186; Member since: Mar 27, 2014

.38 ram ? That's impossible , the 1320 had 1 GB ram , I don't think it has 512 ram , no one will buy it except stupids ! Actually , I was waiting for this device , but its not acceptable to have a 512 ram phone in my hands with HD screen and 400 snapdragon processor

4. juandante

Posts: 679; Member since: Apr 23, 2013

More Microsoft is creating new products without Nokia, More Microsoft is stupid.

10. 87186

Posts: 312; Member since: Aug 01, 2014

make sense, please.

5. DogeShibe

Posts: 1121; Member since: Jan 10, 2014

Processor should be Snapdragon 615. RAM atleast 1.5GB / 2GB.

7. DarkRadeonFX

Posts: 37; Member since: Mar 29, 2014

Just make it 16GB not 32 and add a SD615 and 1.5GB RAM

9. DogeShibe

Posts: 1121; Member since: Jan 10, 2014

Exactly my thoughts!

28. mafiaprinc3

Posts: 585; Member since: May 07, 2012

why is it so easy to move all apps (except system apps) and data to sd card as well as install apps with data to sd card in wp8 and not so easy in android.

8. gaara6775

Posts: 738; Member since: May 20, 2014

720p on 5.7' display? MS gone nuts or what?

11. elitewolverine

Posts: 5192; Member since: Oct 28, 2013

I have 720p on a 55in screen....TV makers must be NUTS, or 80in and 1080p? What madness is this. Seriously though, i have a 11.6in tablet with 720p resolution, and at that small, 1080p may be 'nicer' but its not an 'eyesore' and 90% of all content would not be true 1080p or even 720p quality. You tube may say 1080p, but its far from true quality of 1080p...

17. tech2

Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012

That TV argument is rather daft. There's a difference in viewing distance between a television and a phone by at least 10 times. And as we all know as the distance increases the effect of perceived resolution decreases. Again, that tablet argument is very subjective and doesn't apply to everyone.

22. elitewolverine

Posts: 5192; Member since: Oct 28, 2013

Yes it is, its very daft and yet completely relevant. Lower end phones and the target they are after really don't need 1080p. 720p is not only better for low end, it also helps the cpu/gpu. I rather have 720p, good performance, and smooth experience on a larger screen than actually do a spec war chase just because. Now if this phone is 600$ we have a problem. As stated, my 720p tablet, yes while subjective, so is the view of the person I responded too. On a side note, my 1080p 5in phone looks no different on content than the 720p 4.5in phone, or 4.7in iPhone 6.

18. hurrycanger

Posts: 1766; Member since: Dec 01, 2013

I agree about the resolution thing. 720p is fine even on such big phone as long as it's priced to fit what it offers. The ZTE Zmax for example offers Snapdragon 400, 2gb of ram, LTE, and 5.7" 720p display. For its initial price of $250, it was already darn nice, and now it's only $180 at Walmart or $200 at Best Buy. I only have problems when phones come out with high price yet offers less than what it could, like the Moto X 2013 which was priced way over $500 at first. As for YouTube, 1080p on youtube is really sharp. Video quality can be made better with higher fps and higher bit rate. That's the difference you get between youtube videos and Bluray movies. Rip a bluray movie to a 2gb 1080p file and a 6gb 1080p file and you'll spot the big difference, too. But yea, youtube 1080p videos are very very fine (especially when comparing with other streaming services). The sharpness is there. Not far from true 1080p like you mentioned. If I am to complain about youtube, it would be the 480p and 360p videos. Those 480p and 360p videos are just too compressed you'll see blocks. XD

16. Furbal unregistered

720 worked fine on the note 2. It'll be fine on this

19. Deaconclgi

Posts: 405; Member since: Nov 03, 2012


21. boosook

Posts: 1442; Member since: Nov 19, 2012

Even horses worked fine, until someone invented the car. ;) What was considered good two years ago is not necessarily good anymore. Those specs are good for a Chinese clone.

23. elitewolverine

Posts: 5192; Member since: Oct 28, 2013

So every android with 720p is worthless? So what 70% of androids are worthless..?

24. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

720p is good 1080p is better. QHD is a luxury. Given a choice, its will still be QHD for me. Its great for viewing high resolution photo. Why you always like to drag Android into your WP discussion? It sound so bitter as well. LOL! I also notice that boosook didn't say anything about worthlessness?

25. elitewolverine

Posts: 5192; Member since: Oct 28, 2013

Because I did, not really dragging them into a discussion. Being the most popular OS it will be dragged in by default. And it was to make a point that while 2yrs ago 720p was the luxury or whatever, means that low end entry phones are now getting the older luxury. As it should. Low end phones should be what phones were of 2-3yrs ago that were once considered luxury. Also, if I am bitter, it is only because of the constant problems with android I get to deal with on a daily basis, that is far beyond other OS, like iOS. We could go back and forth all day of the 'power' and I would probably just as jaded if I was a MS only tech or iOS only tech. But I am not a single OS tech for my day, so when half my day is covered in .com errors and good for nothing crashes that a master reset doesn't fix, of course you get jaded on a OS, even I do enjoy it (I freaking own them as of my own free will and almost got the z3 before I bought my 930). Currently a horse in the modern day era, on roads, with cars on them would be considered worthless. It was contextual and if we really need to analyze the idea he was trying to portray (outdated useless technology in the presence of better tech) then yes, one could think he meant, useless, worthless, unneeded, no place in modern phones.....and because my kids are chanting to play candy lane, I shall leave with, please don't make it a derp IQ, analyze everything under a microscope, a blind fraking bat could see what he was implying. A blind bat in a dog fight of another bat (ill let you search the reference).

26. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

Seem like you have a lot of problem with what available to you. I don't. I am happy with Nokia phone, Samsung phone and whatever that available. Life is a bliss.

12. AfterShock

Posts: 4147; Member since: Nov 02, 2012

Don't fret, not everyone can afford high res. Its not that noticeable on a phone or tablet.

13. kaikuheadhunterz

Posts: 1157; Member since: Jul 18, 2013

About a week ago, week ago... Just came here to make that joke

14. Liveitup

Posts: 1798; Member since: Jan 07, 2014

I think that going forward with Windows phone 10 we are going to see MS take WP as serious as they did Surface.

29. Symon_Fleece

Posts: 351; Member since: May 30, 2014

From 5mp to14mp and from VGA to 5mp cameras are great but, why only 512 MB RAM?. 1320 has 1GB, now its successor has only half of that?. 32GB is good but it may come without microSD card slot. Hope this is not 100% true :)

30. elitewolverine

Posts: 5192; Member since: Oct 28, 2013

That is something interesting to see, either early test build, or gfx not seeing it correctly. If you have a windows phone, look at the comments on the app of things not being read write or performance issues were a soc 800 performs worse than 3yr old socs. I like the benchmark tool, fun as heck, but i dont 'trust' it.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.