Five months for updating to ICS: 'very reasonable,' says Android lead developer

Five months for updating to ICS: 'very reasonable,' says Android lead developer
You might have not heard about Jean-Baptiste Queru earlier, but he’s the technical lead of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) and when he talks about Android updates, you’d better listen. One of the interesting things he had to share is his praise for how quickly Sony was able to update its Tablet S to Ice Cream Sandwich.

Now, the most controversial quote to take out is that five months for updating to ICS is a “very reasonable” time frame given the fundamental novelties introduced to the platform with 4.0. Queru gives some much needed context for that, clarifying that it’s not just the phone maker, but it’s also about getting carrier approval, a process that can take quite a while.

To prove its point, the engineer stressed that devices under Google’s direct control got Android 4.0 almost in a flash. The US Motorola Xoom Wi-Fi version for once took only two months to get the update. It’s getting more complicated with carriers involved and the carrier-branded Nexus S was brought up as an example.



19. Santi_Santi unregistered

Nexus From Sony

15. jcpwn2004

Posts: 314; Member since: Jan 18, 2012

This is pretty unacceptable. If google doesn't do something to improve the android experience they may be surprised at how fast people can jump ship. iOS and WP8 aren't slowing down anytime soon. I have a at&t gs2 and I love it but everyday I wake up and don't see an ICS update I get more and more annoyed. If the new iphone comes in different sizes I may be jumping ship. WP8 phones are sure to make a splash as well. Come on google, you have the power to start influencing carriers, start using it.

13. haikallp

Posts: 319; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

easy for him to say, he probably updated his phone within a month after ICS was released. I dont think he would say its reasonable if he was on the other side..

17. Cwebb

Posts: 501; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

You really don't understand carriers do you? They don't care when you get the new OS, because you already spent the money to get the phone and are locked into a contract. They will slowly pass it out once they're sure that there is hardly any bugs, and then we complain that it took so long. If you want a speedy update, rooting is easy ;)

18. haikallp

Posts: 319; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

i do understand but it doesnt change the fact that waiting for 5months for an update thats already out, kindda sucks dont u think

20. Cwebb

Posts: 501; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

I totally agree, but thats why I rooted. The best way to do it would be getting an international phone if your on AT&T/T Mobile or get a Nexus, assuming you wouldn't root. I've had an ICS ROM since Christmas :) Most roots aren't really complicated and you have almost no chance of bricking it as long as you follow all the directions (and don't flash radios or extremely OC)

11. rg987

Posts: 130; Member since: Dec 29, 2011

now , the GOOGLE shud definitely choose SONY as the MANUFACTURER of the NEXT NEXUS they r really gud and can provide the SUPER PREMIUM LOOK to the GOOGLE'S NEXT FLAGSHIP........................and specs will be ofcourse of google's SONY is a PERFECT PARTNER for NEXT NEXUS phone

8. facelessbelief

Posts: 13; Member since: Apr 27, 2012

On my Atrix 2, i'm on 2.3.6 so much better than my Intercept on 2.2. Can't wait for ICS, but the day will come. :-)

16. Cwebb

Posts: 501; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

Don't speak the name of the "intercept." (shutters) I hated every second of that phone, but look where I am now. I know the OS was great, just the crapsung phone was so horrid. Terrible processor, funky screen, and so on and so forth

7. HugeTroller

Posts: 80; Member since: Apr 27, 2012

Indeed, very reasonable because Android is already so fragmentated. Android lead developer doesn't care.

9. theBankRobber

Posts: 682; Member since: Sep 22, 2011

Or maybe you just don't understand what he has to go through to try and push this 1 update to OEM's and carriers. You think its easy to do what this man does? At least he's letting everyone know what the issue is, and its been the carrier problem the whole time and everyone has said that.

10. HugeTroller

Posts: 80; Member since: Apr 27, 2012

That's why I say, its fragmentated no one can change that. While things are just smooth for Windows Phone/iOS. Carrier problem? Why I dont see that on iOS?

12. theBankRobber

Posts: 682; Member since: Sep 22, 2011

Because the carriers have NO CONTROL over the iphone, Apple pushes IOS updates out, not the carrier. Android on the other hand has to have the carrier approve the update after they tweak it with there with their crap. That's why you don't see carrier logos on iPhones and carrier apps like you do on Android.

21. frydaexiii

Posts: 1476; Member since: Dec 01, 2011

I bet you don't even know what fragmented means...

6. Bluesky02

Posts: 1439; Member since: Dec 05, 2011

After so long i'm proud to hear a good news about Sony. That's something right.

14. haikallp

Posts: 319; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

yeap, seems that only Sony is doing a good job in updating thier phones/tablets to ICS.

2. shadowcell

Posts: 300; Member since: Mar 28, 2012

A lot of us, including myself, see when Google launches their newest OS and think it's just that simple to jump onto the latest update. It was only till recently where I was fully informed on how it works. Those who have google-controlled GSM handsets should enjoy blissfully not having that issue but people who have a CDMA handset should respect the virtue of patience and await the glorious update. I should be thankful, some phones don't even have my update (2.3.4) yet.

1. danwatson

Posts: 117; Member since: Jan 03, 2012

With every company offering LTE on different frequencies, i'm guessing the days of Google selling a phone without carrier input will be over after the Galaxy Nexus. You either have to go the Apple route and make demands without exceptions, or you have to go the way Google has gone and let the carriers F-up the hardware/software.

3. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

its the exact opposite really. Since google doesnt force carriers into indentured survitude to sell their products, they are going around carriers. Selling Nexus devices in the play store is only just beginning. And I hope it succeeds. 400 bux for an unlocked top tier phone with direct OS support ?? Yea, thats got me interested.

5. Sleepy

Posts: 13; Member since: Apr 26, 2012

Google should make the Galaxy Nexus available in other countries as well. US may be a big market but it is not the only one!

22. danwatson

Posts: 117; Member since: Jan 03, 2012

I'm saying i love the idea of going around carriers and the price is perfect. But how can they keep going around carriers when LTE doesn't allow you to just change your sim card. My understanding is that the phone has to be carrier specific with LTE. Thus, Google could never sell a LTE enabled phone without going through the carrier

23. Sleepy

Posts: 13; Member since: Apr 26, 2012

I thought CDMA was carrier specific and not LTE.

4. theruleslawyer

Posts: 108; Member since: Apr 23, 2012

I don't see why LTE can't be handled fundamentally the same way as GSM is now. Throw in a pentaband LTE radio and you're good to go. I'd bet that the next nexus has LTE and GSM support. CDMA is the real problem with no sim card.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless