Possible antitrust probe might have led Apple to bring back certain apps

Possible antitrust probe might have led Apple to bring back certain apps
Just the other day, Apple CEO Tim Cook told CBS News that Apple is not a monopoly. That comment related to a U.S. Supreme Court decision that allows a class action suit against the company to continue; the plaintiffs allege the 30% cut of revenue that Apple collects from developers results in consumers paying higher prices for paid apps and in-app purchases. Since iOS is a "closed garden," Apple doesn't allow iPhone users to sideload apps like Android users can. This forces the vast majority of iPhone users to rely on the App Store for their apps (obviously those who jailbreak their iPhones have alternative choices, but at the expense of the warranty).

Those looking for signs that Apple is anti-competitive had to wonder about the decision the company made back in April to rid the App Store of most parental control apps. After all, this is the same tech company whose CEO was telling its customers to put down its most popular device from time-to-time. The same month that third-party parental control apps were told to get the heck out of Dodge, CEO Tim Cook appeared at the TIME 100 Summit to say, "Apple never wanted to maximize user time. We’ve never been about that." Still, the company removed several apps in this category without as much as a warning. Remember, iOS now comes with its own Screen Time feature that alows parents to cap how much time their kids spend on a certain app each day. Cook himself said that he didn't realize how often he was using his iPhone until he checked with Screen Time. Since then, he has adjusted the number of apps that leave notifications on his phone; the fewer notifications that the executive receives, the less often he has to pick up his handset.

Apple claims that these apps would take control over kids' iPhones


There is no doubt that Apple would prefer that its customers stick with Face Time over a third party app. However, on Monday Apple made a change to the App Store Review Guidelines (via The New York Times) that will allow these parental control apps to use mobile device management (M.D.M.) and a virtual private network (V.P.N.).; previously the use of these technologies would be grounds for an app's removal from the App Store. M.D.M. allows parents to grab control of their kids' phones while a V.P.N. allows parents to block their kids from using certain apps. Both technologies allow companies to collect data and sell it to advertisers. Apple's updated App Store policies now allow parental control apps to use these tools, but only if they include in their privacy policies a promise not to "sell, use or disclose to third parties any data for any purpose." 


Some Apple critics point out that Apple didn't make the changes to its App Store policies until House lawmakers started making more noise about investigating big tech for antitrust violations. Earlier this week, a report indicated that Apple and Google could both be probed for antitrust violations by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) while the U.S. Federal Trade Commission is considering similar investigations against Amazon and Facebook. In the current atmosphere, it seems prudent for Apple not to make too much of a big deal about third-party apps that challenge a native iOS feature. Despite the changes made to its App Store policies, the third-party parental control apps that were banished have yet to return to Apple's iOS storefront. Some developers appealed Apple's decision and are awaiting a ruling from the company, while others will have to reapply to be listed.


Developed to combat fears of screen addiction, Screen Time received a glowing write up in the Times last summer when a teenager employed it to cut her iPhone usage in half during a three week period. Meanwhile, developers of competing parental control apps have had a tough time. For example, in August Apple removed the Freedom app from the App Store because it contained a V.P.N. The app tracked and limited how much time people spent on their iPhones. The company's CEO, a gentleman by the name of Fred Stutzman, had a poignant quote about the roller coster ride that he and other iOS parental control app developers have been on. "My reaction is: Why this last year of pain? And we end up exactly in the same place," Stutzman noted. The top parental control app on the App Store prior to its removal in February was OurPact. The app had 3 million installs and claims to have lost $3 million because of Apple's actions.

FEATURED VIDEO

8 Comments

1. oldskool50

Posts: 1580; Member since: Mar 29, 2019

Hah. Such a deceptive company.

3. sgodsell

Posts: 7377; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

They certainly are. Also when Alan said Apple doesn't allow anyone to sideload apps. That's one tiny part that actually doesn't matter as much as Apple forcing all developers to use Apple's monetization methods. It's why Netflix removed everything and anything associated with monetization within their app. Apple doesn't even allow your app to even mention going to your own website to pay, or your app will never make it on Apple's app store. Talk about control. Google allows developers apps to use their own website for monetization, and your app can even mention going to a website for monetization. Apple has to change that. I hope the DOJ forces Apple to change that aspect, then apps like Spotify and Netflix could by pass Apple's monetization methods altogether.

6. TheOracle1

Posts: 2291; Member since: May 04, 2015

Sleazy moves by Apple continue.

2. cmdacos

Posts: 4214; Member since: Nov 01, 2016

Lol crooked bastards

4. CableTelcontar

Posts: 94; Member since: Nov 19, 2014

Are we going to ignore news about a $1,000 monitor stand? Would love to see the PA comments

5. Demo-jay

Posts: 70; Member since: Feb 13, 2018

Phonearena is only and strictly for phones..tell me if am wrong but a monitor stand ain’t a phone is it?.... And again why worked out by something u can’t afford...u definitely not the target audience if u complaining about it

7. CableTelcontar

Posts: 94; Member since: Nov 19, 2014

Ahhh. My bad. Just got to used to the pro and anti apple crowd bickering here. I'll just ignore the rest of your comment.

8. Be_Mine

Posts: 263; Member since: Dec 29, 2013

'too used to'

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.