First Galaxy S7 teardown reveals the liquid cooling system
53. MSi_GS70 (unregistered)
whats the purpose of this ?
54. j2001m (Posts: 2943; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)
Samsung did say they made the s7 waterproof form the inside, over stopping it from going in,if that means anything, no idea, but that what they said?
2. bugsbunny00 (Posts: 2062; Member since: 07 Jun 2013)
damn this phone has its own a/c...this is a plus.
22. adecvat (Posts: 266; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
Just like the phones with S810, if you know what i mean :)
32. insyt (Posts: 49; Member since: 16 Sep 2015)
Yeah when Samsung does it then its a like natural wonder of the world. But when the 810 phones (Z5 has DUAL heat pipes) copied this tech from PC's, they were being bashed left right and center. PA should be ashamed of their disgusting behavior.
35. medicci37 (Posts: 1278; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)
No they were being bashed because the pos 810 was still overheating
58. MSi_GS70 (unregistered)
BET in 2017-18 smartphones will come with built in cooling fans ..
4. Neros (Posts: 1016; Member since: 19 Dec 2014)
The only thing that sucks in this phone is the exynos. Pretty much sd820 version is flawless. I hope that the phone has no 4k recording limit finally. Otherwise, I'll be greatly disappointed.
6. maherk (Posts: 3803; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
I ve seen some antutu benchmark tests where the exynos scored higher than the sd820.
But even if it had a lower score, it is still getting more than double what 2015 was scoring.
So I fail to see how it sucks.
8. S.R.K. (banned) (Posts: 678; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
He's a Snapdragon fan. He can't accept that he's Cpu is crap. Comparing it to the Exynos. Though 1 good point the SnapDragon is more Dev friendly.
55. j2001m (Posts: 2943; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)
Looks, for android muti-score is better so I do not give a crap what antutu says I more about geakbench says and that ver close single core and a killer muti
Also the m1 keeps the score on many tests
14. Captain_Doug (Posts: 997; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
The SD800 was fast enough for me. From here on out it's all about power efficiency and I can't wait to read about which one performs better. I'm probably going to go with the G5 though so I guess it won't matter anyway.
36. DoggyDangerous (Posts: 859; Member since: 28 Aug 2015)
SD has more wide developer's support. This is the reason I want SD. Otherwise, what Qcomm did last year is not forgettable.
7. S.R.K. (banned) (Posts: 678; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
The Exynos is more powerful. Exynos chips were always underclocked to meet same expectations to the SnapDragon variant. Or-else Exynos destroys the SnapDragon. Due to heat. Now they've used cooling system to reduce heat. They should've used an advance version and use the Exynos Soc at standard or uprated settings.
13. Neros (Posts: 1016; Member since: 19 Dec 2014)
Sammy had to OC the exynos to keep up with the sd820, not the other way around. 810 was crap and exynos was amazing in 2015, but now the tables have turned. I'm not disappointed with the exynos cpu as much as I am with the crappy mali gpu that comes with it. Andreno has always been superior. That's the problem.
20. TyrionLannister (unregistered)
Exynos is actually underclocked LOL. Exynos 7420 was 772 MHz on GPU, 8890 is just 650 MHz.
Talk to me again when proper tests are done. I'm pretty sure both will be pretty much equal.
23. S.R.K. (banned) (Posts: 678; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
I was just about to write that, but you beat me to it. He's a Snapdragon fan boy. It really hurts him to gob the truth.
28. rubyonrails3 (Posts: 266; Member since: 01 Oct 2014)
Underclocked but probably bigger cores.
47. SYSTEM_LORD (Posts: 555; Member since: 05 Oct 2015)
It should be underclocked with 12 cores! I like this approach, though. Not sure about Adreno's architecture either.
46. alex3run (Posts: 713; Member since: 18 May 2014)
That "crappy" Mali GPU beats "not crappy" Adreno since 2011 every single time.
48. Shocky (unregistered)
No, Samsung released underclocked prototypes for testing purposes.
41. S.R.K. (banned) (Posts: 678; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
Because Mali Gpu are 100mhz lower than the SnapDragon.
60. catze86 (Posts: 726; Member since: 07 Dec 2015)
Why I sense hiden agreement between Quallcom and Samsung?
11. TyrionLannister (unregistered)
Wait for the real proper tests by reputed sites who know what they are doing in field( like anandtech or tomshardware), before coming to conclusion.
Currently it looks like Exynos has 20% faster CPU and 10% slower GPU. It may change(for better or worse) with final software/hardware. Also keep into account that mali and powerVR are usually faster in real life games than adreno GPUs.
15. pmsap (Posts: 80; Member since: 26 May 2015)
What I wonder is if those websites will get the phone before launch. Basically, are we going to see proper tests before launch date?
18. TyrionLannister (unregistered)
I don't think so. Anandtech will release the review around early-mid April. They take their time but the end result is worth it. i prefer a late review which I can trust over an early half-baked one.
24. pmsap (Posts: 80; Member since: 26 May 2015)
Damn.. I've been waiting for S7 to come out. But I think I was hoping for something slightly better (mostly in the camera department - still no info w.r.t. slow motion capabilities). Especially to go for a pre-order buy.
Nonetheless, I don't see myself waiting for iphone 7 (which is unlikely to have a huge improvement camera wise). Decisions, decisions.
43. Macready (Posts: 961; Member since: 08 Dec 2014)
In other words, apples vs oranges, when insisting Chrome on Android tells us much about SoC performance.
44. TyrionLannister (unregistered)
Instead, google must fix chrome. I can't believe how bad chrome is compared to safari.
At least they don't use Antutu LOL.
29. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 10115; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)
Why does the Exynos suck? It score 131,000 on Antutu, based on honest testing by other parties and not PA's testing where the phone is obviously in power save mode or something.
49. mitchytan92 (Posts: 83; Member since: 02 Mar 2015)
Actually that wasn't anything impressive. My iPhone 6S+ scores 133813. I know partly is thanks to lower resolution but it is a 5 months old phone already. The SD820 scores about there as well.
For me I would prefer to get the SD820. I want custom roms, kernels and more mods. I don't want to be stuck to Samsung rom again after the s6 terrible ram management. Even if SD820 might be weaker but it is worth it.
9. Trakker (Posts: 283; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
I am seriously impressed here, and no one can argue this is just a slightly upgraded S6 anymore when it has freaking liquid cooling in it.
16. Trakker (Posts: 283; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
Just because it looks similar doesn't mean it is.
19. TerryTerius (Posts: 1794; Member since: 10 Apr 2014)
Have fun with whatever phone you get fellla. Hope you like it. There's no need to be sarcastic.
21. DONUT (Posts: 425; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)
didn't the Z5 series have something similar to cool down the S810?
26. S.R.K. (banned) (Posts: 678; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
Yes it did. The Z3+ and Z5. Oems are asking soc makers to make their chips more efficient, instead them using liquid cool based pipes to reduce heat, and also using lower Mah batteries. Stupid dumbass Oems.
25. Plutonium239 (Posts: 1048; Member since: 17 Mar 2015)
Liquid cooling was in the Lumia 950 and 950xl prior to the s7.
27. S.R.K. (banned) (Posts: 678; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
It was on the Z3 first, along with Dragontrail glass instead of Gorilla glass, to reduce heat.
30. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 10115; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)
Why does it matter so much who did something first?
34. yoosufmuneer (Posts: 1498; Member since: 14 Feb 2015)
So why does it matter so much when he replies an accurate answer?
50. mitchytan92 (Posts: 83; Member since: 02 Mar 2015)
True. I am happy more and more Android manufacturers are treating thermal dissipation seriously. Hopefully we gets lesser and lesser thermal throttling.
52. elitewolverine (Posts: 5184; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
There was a thread about this where the z3 used a different variation than what the 950 used, and not entirely comparable in terms of 'liquid'.
31. xondk (Posts: 1410; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
Called heatpipes, and its phase cooling not really liquid cooling
37. S.R.K. (banned) (Posts: 678; Member since: 11 Feb 2016)
Liquid cooling would be much cooler. But dearer to cost.
59. xondk (Posts: 1410; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
That just is not right, phase cooling is sort of liquid cooling, taking advantage of the fact that more heat can be absorbed when switching between liquid/gas and it is in a lot of high end graphic cards what spread the head to the main headsink, meaning it is highly effective...