1440 x 2560 pixel resolution (QHD) displays: yay or nay?
- 1440 x 2560 pixel resolution (QHD) displays: yay or nay?
1224 votes (1224 votes) Yay! More pixels means more awesomeness, and that's that for me.
1645 votes (1645 votes) Nay! Anything over 1080p for non-phablet devices is an overkill
6. DaHarder (Posts: 154; Member since: 10 Oct 2009)
I'll wait to see if there's a truly noticeable difference when used at a normal viewing distance and what kind of impact 'pushing all those extra pixels' has on battery longevity.
1080p looks so good at this point that I'd likely rather the focus go into improving battery life/display efficiency than packing in more pixels.
25. akki20892 (Posts: 3304; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Most of people said no when 1080p was coming in phones. 720p was enough.
We will see great battery technology ahead, don't worry. QHD is great, just like TV got 4K.
27. Arte-8800 (limited) (Posts: 4054; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
Wait another 2years for that. No Oems want to use advanced tech due to being expensive. What they will do is use a 3500+mah.
Comparing Tv to a 5inch screen is a big diffrence due to Tv's using less ppi than using high ppi on small screens
Look at the S5 vs Note3 screen, big difference what ppi can do.
36. jove39 (Posts: 1262; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
1080p/1200p resolution is great for displays up to 7" and 1440p/1800p is great for 8" and bigger displays...higher resolution takes toll on performance...gpu has to work harder to push extra pixels...need more memory bandwidth to push data in display buffers...and not to forget...all this drains battery quite fast.
37. jove39 (Posts: 1262; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
So you must have some sort of visibility disorder...comparing ~5" screen with ~50" screen on tv!
26. Arte-8800 (limited) (Posts: 4054; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
No thanks . increased Cpu and battery drainage.
I would prefer 1080P with 533ppi
58. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 1201; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)
With a resolution at this size, there would also be an "increased Cpu and battery drainage.". The number of PPI at this size makes it pointless.
33. buccob (Posts: 1356; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
I would like to see a Blind test where people are asked to identify which phone has 1080p display and which one has over it... All bezels covered, only the same picture being displayed and you can only look from the same distance without any help (magnifying glass)...
I would love too see how many "average" persons would get it right...
My guess is that over 350ppi at 12" (30 cm) nobody would really notice... so even 720p can get into play.
1080p for phones under 6" is a battery killer, 1440p for devices under 8" screen is also a battery killer.... But since everyone is doing 440ppi... I would be ok with 1440p at 6" screens minimum.
42. aminkhs (Posts: 11; Member since: 11 May 2014)
Stronge nay! Because I want a feature that useful for me not unuseful this feature only kill my battery life! Our eyes cant support this feature! I think better camera or lighter weight or prettier body is more immportant for me
2. Birds (Posts: 971; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)
I hope the LG G-Flex 2 has a huge 6 inch OLED QHD Screen. I got a chance to play with the phone and OMG, there is no other phone that has better looking videos... I swear that screen was build exclusively for watching videos because for anything else, it's NAH.... And below 80% brightness...the screen slightly ghosts around... It ain't bad but for a phone that is that expensive I'd expect more.
3. XaErO (Posts: 138; Member since: 25 Sep 2012)
Higher Resolution displays are always welcome !!
The only thing they need to keep in check is Battery Consumption ..
4. sssbeesss (Posts: 1; Member since: 04 May 2014)
unfortunately I haven't seen a phone with that much pixels.
5. kaikuheadhunterz (Posts: 692; Member since: 18 Jul 2013)
I don't mind devices having QHD screens. I'm sure other people would still buy them. Besides, if it becomes popular, it would bring down the price of 1080p screens, so more hurray for the midrange/low-end market
7. sip1995 (Posts: 757; Member since: 07 Feb 2014)
The human eye CAN'T see any difference on 1080+ resolution. QHD screens may drain the battery really fast.
12. sgodsell (Posts: 1051; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
I can see a big difference between 720p and 1080p displays on phones. I know its not QHD. To tell you the truth I am fine with 1080p display on phones.
21. sip1995 (Posts: 757; Member since: 07 Feb 2014)
In 720 vs 1080 there is a difference, but in 1080 vs QHD i don't think you can see a lot.
43. tedkord (Posts: 4504; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
Yes, you can. Text will be more readable while smaller with less jags. Someone with better than average sight (me) would be able to see differences more readily, but not in everything.
41. GreekGeek (Posts: 659; Member since: 22 Mar 2014)
Depends on the screen size. On 5.5 inch and below probably there isn't, you go north of that of course there will be a noticeable difference
8. ckoch125 (Posts: 191; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Yay definitely. Do we need the extra pixels? Not really but the screens become better and I am all for continued progress and innovation. Now if only battery would take the same route.
10. NokiaFTW (limited) (Posts: 1900; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)
Yay... as long as battery life isn't affected.
11. jellmoo (Posts: 650; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
I would rather that manufacturers spend more time making the current res displays "better". We are switching display resolutions so quickly that I don't think we are maximizing potential.
I'd rather see companies try and make the best 1080p displays they can. Perfect colour accuracy, work on better minimum and maximum brightness levels, keep colour temperature good, have less bleeding in displays, etc...
There is a strange vibe in mobile (especially in Android) that 'more=better'. I don't think that's always true, and I'd prefer we see companies improve on what we have, rather than keep going with the spec race.
19. Bishop_99 (Posts: 63; Member since: 04 Dec 2013)
I think the best option, in that scenario, would be if we had the option to calibrate the displays on our phones, the same way we calibrate the displays on our TV's. Provide a great screen by the OEM and give us the option to completely control and calibrate even simple things as contrast, color, color temperature, gamma, sharpness etc.
Instead of only having the setting set forward by the OEM's, we could properly adjust it to our liking.
29. Arte-8800 (limited) (Posts: 4054; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
Also they should provide the same option with CPU and GPU have the "Turbo Mode" button for extreme multitasking like on the i5 and i7 intel Socs.
32. jellmoo (Posts: 650; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
Couldn't agree more. Different people see things differently and like different setups. For example, I much prefer a cooler display to a warm one.
This is a great point as this would be a feature that would definitely get me interested in a device. Nicely put!
13. refillable (Posts: 596; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)
Of course yay, if there is few compromises. But, If a high calliber company as LG is interested on implementing on them, they should have taken the consideration of Battery life, laginess, etc.
14. surethom (Posts: 232; Member since: 04 Mar 2009)
Kills the battery too much, fine on a devide over 7" but dont really need it on a 5" ish phone.
45. tedkord (Posts: 4504; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
We heard the battery argument when screens went from wvga to 720p, and again when they went to 1080p - and it didn't happen. Each successive generation of hardware is more power efficient such that battery life is equal or better.
55. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)
Let's say with 2k the battery is same as it is now with 1080p, I would still rather take 1080p and get even more awesome battery life than getting higher res screen when it's most likely to be less noticeably If at all compared to the jump from 720p to 1080p.
16. Bishop_99 (Posts: 63; Member since: 04 Dec 2013)
Super yay. It's not the high pixel count, because the pixels greatly change depending on screen size for the same resolution. It's yay for me because 2560x1440 display are being brought onto our phones.
For those that don't care about screen resolutions much, the 1280x720 and 1920x1080 displays aren't going away. So people will have even more options now.
22. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 801; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)
We are going to see more low ends coming with 4-4.5inch HD720P displays, Mid ends and some high ends with HD1080P displays and then premium high ends with QHD :)
This is a good thing for the low end, where we are going to start seeing High PPI displays there, as the HD720P displays become cheaper to make.
56. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)
I wish that would be the case but something tells me we will still be seeing 480x800 res screens and 960x540 screens. Regardless how much cheaper 720p gets, those other screens will be much cheaper and most oems when building a low end budget device will almost always go for the cheapest parts.
17. Slammer (Posts: 985; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)
This article is one of a constant reminder that the battery is the most critical component of a mobile DC powered device. Smartphones are getting larger. Chips are becoming more powerful. Screens becoming more vivid and clear. Yet, in the midst of obtaining all this technological advancements, the best we can hope for is sticking a larger battery inside. No new battery advancements whatsoever. Same 30 year old technology. Just making them larger to accommodate larger devices. Those that complain about battery life on a single charge, should think about carrying an Automotive 12v battery tethered to the phone.
We want thinner and lighter. We want faster and more powerful. We want larger and brighter screens. But what about the battery? Do we really want to settle for 30 year old technology in today's devices? Now we seal the most vulnerable component in a device that we can't replace? Let's concentrate on perfecting the power source first before adding more features that degrade the subject of most concern; the battery.
18. npaladin2000 (Posts: 127; Member since: 06 Nov 2011)
Show me some QHD content and maybe I'll say it's worth it. For now, it's the only bad thing about the LG G3: a 1080p screen would probably get even more battery life than whatever it gets now (which, knowing LG, is probably excellent battery life).
20. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 801; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)
Looking forward to my Note 4 with 5.7inch QHD SuperAMOLED. The battery should be larger, the CPU should be more power efficient, and it should give similar if not better battery life than the Note 3, so I'm happy :D
The haters, most of whom support OEMs that won't use QHD can hate all they want. :)
35. Bishop_99 (Posts: 63; Member since: 04 Dec 2013)
Same here, really looking forward to the QHD Note 4 with the S805. I now have the Galaxy S4, so this is going to be a huge jump in technology for me. I can't wait and I'm glad I skipped the S5. Completely worth waiting for the Note 4.
46. redmd (Posts: 868; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
I'm happy with my 1080p Note3. So I'll pass on the Note 4. Not unless it will have a 4000+ mah.
23. AnukulVcool (Posts: 121; Member since: 02 Jun 2012)
Most of the video content is 1080p and the phone records 4k, watching 1080p on a 2k display is a bad experience compared to 1080p display because the video is stretched with indefinite pixel marking. a 1080p display can display 4k because the marking is a clear 1:4 ratio. sorry pixel peepers, for me its either 1080p or 4k and nothing in between
38. Bishop_99 (Posts: 63; Member since: 04 Dec 2013)
The youtube you watch on your 1080p phone is really 720p. Unless you only watch 1080p videos on the phones, most streaming services to your phone is 720p. In reality, you are probably mostly seeing 720p video most of the time on your phone, depends on your source.
The aspect ratio of the video determines the size, and these phones don't need to stretch out the video at all, all it would do is upconvert it. A proper 1080p video, like one from a Blu-ray, would upconvert much better to a 1440p display, than a highly compressed 1080p video. Besides, now with these phones recording in 2160p, these videos only have to be downconverted to 1440p and not further down to 1080p.
24. Heatfan316 (Posts: 364; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)
Yay of course. Technology would become stagnant, we wouldn't be moving forward then just like apple, how many times did they change their resolution, just once I believe and they were forced to do so, otherwise they would still have a resolution of 480×320 pathetic! Android is always the leader moving forward.
28. Desmortibus (Posts: 56; Member since: 04 Apr 2014)
According to a large variety of polls worldwide, nothing is more important than battery life. That's why AMOLED displays will always have an edge (especially when they are are good as the one on the Galaxy S5) and that's why anything above 1080 is counterproductive. This being said, because our irrational self always prevails over mere logic, like everyone else I must confess that I would be excited to get a 2k display on one of my smartphones (and, why not, a 4k display... like on the Galaxy S6 probably coupled with a 64-bit 8-core Snapdragon 810...).
30. scy1192 (Posts: 11; Member since: 15 May 2014)
I'll say Yay for this one, but I'm not 100% convinced and I'll wait until I get my G3 to say for sure. But I swear if these guys try going higher next year, it'll be a big fat no.
Maybe they could have it switch on-the-fly to a lower resolution in a power saving mode. Being QHD you can run at 720p with simple pixel doubling. There are already apps that can change the display resolution so it shouldn't be difficult to implement if it really does significantly affect battery life.
31. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6239; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Which one yes n which one no? YAHHH
39. OmarKS (Posts: 13; Member since: 31 Oct 2013)
1080p is really enough for our eyes, for a device under 6" or 7" display.
44. HildyJ (Posts: 95; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
There is NO way to increase resolution without decreasing battery life and increasing display lag (if there's a dedicated GPU) or general phone speed (if there isn't). A phone's processors can only crank out a fixed number of FLOPS (floating logical operation per second). Each operation takes time and consumes energy.
It might not make much of an improvement but, given the choice, I'd rather have more battery and a faster phone/display. 4K or even 8K on a 60" screen is worth it. 1080p on a 5" screen is more than enough.
Remember: TANSTAAFP - there ain't no such thing as a free pixel.
47. 1ceTr0n (Posts: 505; Member since: 20 May 2012)
Seriously, what the fark is the point of this at normal eye reading distance? It was not distinguishable for me when I went from my 720P Note 2 to my Note 3 1080P unless I put my damn eybeball right on the screen, but who the fark does that beyond anal people?
48. 7thspaceman (Posts: 1050; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
I like the fact that high Tech video scren tech is advancing and you can bet your butt an OEM will put these high pixel screens on a device but if theses new high tech high pixel density screens eat up too much battery life they will be put on Desktop Computers which are connected to a power receptacle on a wall socket. I would love to have a 24 inch Monitor with a 1440 X 2560. I Use my desktop computer every day Folks Tablet computers are OK but most people want to see video, movies and play high def Games on a Nice 1080P 24inch
high def Monitor. The PC desktop computer I predict will never die because a Tablet is a fixed specification device what you buy is what you get FOREVER! On a desktop PC you can upgrade it through it's PCI or PCI express 1 or 2 slots and hook it up to a nice 24 to 27 inch 1080p Monitor or to your big ASS 60 inch HDTV.
49. Furbal (Posts: 263; Member since: 22 Sep 2012)
Why would anyone not want resolution to keep moving up? It forces the the old old standard to become cheaper and more it into mid/low end.....
51. romeo1 (Posts: 197; Member since: 06 Jan 2012)
None of the 2.
For the time being ill stick to 1080p as 2k is a useless resolution.
We us 1080p videos the next step is 4k not Qhd. Everything is on 1080p some times even 720p so not for me but 4k bring it on
53. Planterz (Posts: 683; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)
Nay unless it's like 6". Otherwise it's just a marketing gimmick to sell more phones at the cost of battery life.
54. gigaraga (Posts: 689; Member since: 29 Mar 2013)
720p is too little, 1080p is excellent, 1440p is excellent also, although if I had to choose between the two, 1080p would still be my choice unless its a Super AMOLED 1440p then sure why not...it just seems like the GPU would be power hungry though but otherwise that gorgeous 1440p ....
57. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)
I have 1080p 5" phone, 1080p 7" tablet, brother has 1080p 8" tablet and on every single one from a normal viewing distant, they all look just as sharp as one another. Sure once you start literally putting eyeballs to screens or in the tablet case only a couple inches away you may see slight sharpness decrease but imo if to see pixels you have to go pass the normal viewing distance by more than an inch then it doesn't matter. It's like my TV, from my sofa I can't see no pixels but if I go close up I can see pixels. It doesn't matter as Long as it's sharp from my sofa. Lol am going round and round, point is give me 1080p screen in a phone any day over 2k because I would rather have the better battery life, better performance etc than boast about pixels that won't make a difference in normal view other than under a magnifying glass.