x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Lenovo Yoga TAB 3 8-inch Review

Lenovo YOGA Tab 3 8-inch

Posted: , by John V.


Lenovo Yoga TAB 3 8-inch Review


Lenovo Yoga TAB 3 8-inch Review
Lenovo Yoga TAB 3 8-inch Review
Lenovo Yoga TAB 3 8-inch Review
Lenovo Yoga TAB 3 8-inch Review
Android tablets as a whole have been seeing a tremendous slowdown over the last couple of years, nowhere close to the feverish levels of what they were a few years back with the segment’s genesis. Lenovo’s Yoga tablet series, surprisingly enough, has been on a consistent release over the last few years spawning a series of models since its introduction. With this latest 3rd generation model, some folks will be leery about the Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 8-inch’s specs reduction over its predecessors, but its significantly lower starting cost might make them think otherwise.

The package contains:

  • Lenovo Yoga Tab
  • microUSB cable
  • Wall charger
  • Users guide
  • Warranty information


The price is cheap, but the design makes it feel like it costs more.

The Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 8-inch replicates the same signature design of the series, but it mixes things up a bit because the chassis is now covered in a matte finish. The tablet’s weight has also increased, for better or worse.

Changes to its design include a new spring activated system for locking its kickstand in place. It’s a small new feature we know, but something that indicates refinement to its design. Another notable shakeup is the fact that there’s now a single, rotatable camera placed on its hinge, which is useful in not only positioning it precisely for a shot, but also knowing that you’re not getting an inferior camera for selfies as well. Aside from that, it still offers the same myriad of ‘yoga’ poses with its kickstand, to better have it propped for particular occasions – whether it’s typing something up, or merely kicking back and watching a video.


Sporting a lower resolution screen, everything about it screams subpar.

In reaching its inexpensive cost, Lenovo had to reduce the display’s resolution over last year’s model, matching that of the first-generation Yoga tablet. What we have here is an 8-inch 800 x 1200 IPS-LCD display that seriously sores the eyes with its fuzzier looks – it’s just nowhere as sharp as the 1920 x 1200 resolution of the Yoga Tablet 2’s screen.

Looking at the display alone with our eyes, we can tell it’s attempting to divert our attention towards its overblown colors. Some might take fancy in that, but it doesn’t really produce realistic, real-world colors.

Diving deeper, its cold ~8100K color temperature, 1.99 gamma value, and peak brightness of 345 nits reflect the screen's unsatisfying characteristics. Throw in its weak viewing angles, it’s something that washes out and is nearly impossible to see on bright sunny days. Quite frankly, your eyes are going to need to work just a bit harder using this screen.

  • Options

posted on 13 Nov 2015, 14:14 10

3. bur60 (Posts: 878; Member since: 07 Jul 2014)

Well PA, what did you expect from a 170 dollar tablet? I think you kinda lost your vision. It's not all about raw performance and user experience. The price also takes a big part (by your review logic, a 1 milion dollar price tag on the best device ever made would get 10/10 if it also had an apple on it.)

posted on 13 Nov 2015, 14:53 1

5. techandbeers (banned) (Posts: 110; Member since: 02 Nov 2015)

It actually shouldn't. If the tablet sucks, it sucks. No matter the price.

posted on 13 Nov 2015, 14:56 1

7. bur60 (Posts: 878; Member since: 07 Jul 2014)

It offers what you pay for it in the tablet market so it doesn't really "suck" if you ask me. It's "cheap" and it's cheap.

posted on 13 Nov 2015, 16:36

12. ThePython (Posts: 901; Member since: 08 May 2013)

That's implying a Nexus 7 also sucks just because it's cheap. You don't always get what you pay for.

posted on 27 Nov 2015, 00:10

19. downphoenix (Posts: 3165; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)

Yes but sucks should be defined partly based on the price. A phone like the Moto G for instance is often praised, partly due to its great performance and features for the price, but it will still lag behind an HTC M9 or Galaxy S6 class phone. Such a phone can get a lower review score than a Moto G, but it doesn't mean they are a worse phone. Also we have to keep in mind certain things like the quality of rear camera performance or minor aspects like color temperature, they may be bothersome to techies, but the average joe may not really care much about camera quality (Because who ACTUALLY uses their tablet as their camera) or screen color temps (some people just want something that's "good enough").

posted on 13 Nov 2015, 15:28 1

9. bur60 (Posts: 878; Member since: 07 Jul 2014)

Fyi: I am not saying this tab deserves better score (don't have it can't tell that), but I'm talking about how PA has been undercutting every review especially asian products.

posted on 13 Nov 2015, 15:06

8. guest (Posts: 338; Member since: 13 Jun 2012)

Snapdragon 210?? LOL put an intel chip in there and watch it fly.

posted on 13 Nov 2015, 15:34

10. kefalin (Posts: 288; Member since: 08 Feb 2015)

Im disappointed with this tablet too. Pretty much downgrade comparing to Yoga 2,which had Intel Atom,and that one was more serious than 210....

posted on 13 Nov 2015, 17:54

15. Andrewtst (Posts: 678; Member since: 25 Jan 2009)

It is ugly design with bad LCD and one of the worst camera I ever seen recently. Some more with unbelievable low end processor and 1GB RAM.

I give it 4 star out of 10.

posted on 29 Nov 2015, 23:57

20. Felixkin (Posts: 13; Member since: 27 Oct 2015)

Sucks. Poor design

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

PhoneArena rating:
Display8.0 inches, 800 x 1280 pixels (189 ppi) IPS LCD
Camera8 megapixels
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212, Quad-core, 1300 MHz, ARM Cortex-A7 processor
Size8.27 x 5.75 x 0.28 inches
(210 x 146 x 7 mm)
16.65 oz  (472 g)

Latest stories