The iPhone 6's camera could be coming with Electronic Image Stabilization and larger, 1.75μm pixels

The iPhone 6's camera could be coming with Electronic Image Stabilization and larger, 1.75μm pixels
Sun Chang Xu, the analyst in chief at ESM-China, has taken to the Chinese Twitter-equivalent, Weibo, suggesting that the upcoming Apple iPhone 6 could ditch Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in favor of Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS), and also pack a camera with larger, 1.75μm pixels (versus the 1.5μm ones on the iPhone 5s).

The reason for this could be quite simple -- an OIS module means moving parts, which, in turn, equals a larger camera unit that could easily put a stop to Apple's slim-sizing efforts, if such exist. In comparison, EIS simply leverages smart software algorithms that try to compensate for movement -- an approach that can actually be quite effective, as we've seen with the Galaxy S5. Not to be under-appreciated, the EIS road would also mean lower production costs. 

As for the second claim, a spike in pixel size is also a reasonable expectation, though, again, none of this falls down into the 'confirmed' pile of iPhone 6 rumors. We won't entertain the notion and take it too far, but instead will just point out that the theoretical advantage behind larger pixels is in the capacity of the sensor to capture more light, all things being the equal. 

These are just two new claims that we can now add to the rapidly-growing battle chest of rumors the iPhone 6 has already accumulated. Quite frankly, unless Apple has tightened security around its new product, we wouldn't be surprised to see a reasonable portion of those transform into reality. That said, it's probably best to keep a cool head and not let your imagination get the better of you in the coming, rumor-filled months.

source: Weibo [1], [2] via MacRumors

FEATURED VIDEO

27 Comments

1. TisaTsir

Posts: 70; Member since: Jan 06, 2014

Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) sounds gimmick....but iphone 6 look promising.

3. PhoneArenaUser

Posts: 5498; Member since: Aug 05, 2011

"Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) sounds gimmick...." Could you please explain why you think that EIS is a gimmick? Because in my opinion EIS is not a gimmick.

15. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

How is EIS different from digital image stabilization? If Apple goes with larger pixels and a larger (lower f-number) lens, the need for OIS compared to their previous gen iToy is reduced (low-light pics with the new iToy look better than with the 5S). However, they won't look as good as they could with OIS + lower f-number lens + larger pixels. If digital image stabilization was so good, it would be in the DSLRs. But it isn't. Even under MS, a Lumia may be my next phone purchase.

17. Kamehameha

Posts: 44; Member since: Apr 21, 2014

A DSLR doesn't have space or price limitations like smartphone cameras do. Why do you think a 150$ camera like the Canon IXUS 255 HS can knock the socks off any smartphone camera in existence (except Lumia 1020 and 808)?? There is a lot of space and enough money is used to put quality lenses (Carl Zeiss Tessar Optics etc.).

21. PhoneArenaUser

Posts: 5498; Member since: Aug 05, 2011

Everything that you have wrote, how does that makes EIS gimmick? OIS and EIS both are image stabilization techniques just works in different way. Both of them does the job and each of them has own advantages and disadvantages.

22. PhoneArenaUser

Posts: 5498; Member since: Aug 05, 2011

I don't say that EIS is better than OIS or opposite. But if someone says that EIS is a gimmick then OIS is also a gimmick since both of these functions are meant to do the same job.

25. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

The problem I have with EIS is in the algorithm(s) impact on the resulting image (kind of how noise reduction algorithms have differing levels of success reducing noise in pics, where large sensors with large pixels are pretty much able to avoid the problem). I realize there is a trade-off between compact size and image stabilization. I am less interested in thin form factor if it comes with having to give up a preferred feature (OIS).

24. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

Did I post that EIS was a gimmick? I am under-whelmed that Apple seems to be going with digital stabilization instead of OIS. Personally, I am more willing to deal with limitations of WP to be able to get quality pics from a smartphone. Which is why a Lumia may be my next smartphone.

27. PhoneArenaUser

Posts: 5498; Member since: Aug 05, 2011

"Did I post that EIS was a gimmick?" I thought that you are also thinking that EIS is a gimmick because you replied to my comment #3 where I was asking TisaTsir why he thinks that EIS is a gimmick.

12. sar44

Posts: 278; Member since: Apr 14, 2014

Where is gimmick? phonearena.com/news/Galaxy-S5-Digital-Stabilizatio​n-vs-LG-G2-Optical-Image-Stabilization-video-compa​rison_id55500 Smartphones now focusing and shoot very quickly (and speed only increases) therefore does not need OIS

13. NexusPhan

Posts: 632; Member since: Jul 11, 2013

The problem with EIS is that it's guaranteed to cause some form of image degradation. Even if it's minor, why would you not choose OIS, where there is zero image degradation? As the frame starts to get very bumpy, like when running or sports or many other activities, OIS is far superior as the limits of EIS are surpassed. With Apple charging as much as they do for their phones, they ought go all out with OIS.

16. sar44

Posts: 278; Member since: Apr 14, 2014

Have not seen any degradation in comparison with the OIS "OIS is far superior as the limits of EIS are surpassed." In mobile cameras zero difference

14. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

No matter how good DIS is (Z2 has the best one on phones), it's not as good as OIS. OIS doesn't crop the image at all and a good OIS still stabilizes more than good DIS.

18. Kamehameha

Posts: 44; Member since: Apr 21, 2014

Big pixels also have higher dynamic range and since the pixels are larger, exposure times can be lower which also helps reduce camera shake.

2. twens

Posts: 1174; Member since: Feb 25, 2012

Gimmick or no gimmick if it does what's it's supposed to then it's welcomed. I don't own an s5 but my friend does and the pictures are outstanding. Abnormal detail level and u hardly get blurry shorts even though it doesn't come with OIS.

5. JC557

Posts: 1919; Member since: Dec 07, 2011

The EIS does very well in my Sony Action Cam and also helps deliver very good results for the Galaxy S5 (cousins) and HTC One M8 (mine). It would be cool if they could combine the use of both OIS and EIS to further iron out the shakey photos.

6. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

My Sony Cyber-shot also combines OIS and DIS. It's IMPOSSIBLE to see any shake on the videos if zoomed out. It even takes out small movements, not just shake. And it doesn't even crop the image if zoomed out.

4. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

So it'll probably have 8 mpx and slightly bigger sensor. I hope they would increase the pixel count. Even though 5s takes awesome pictures, they just lack the details of competition. And now what the he** is the difference between electronic and digital stabilization? Just the name?

10. Genza

Posts: 576; Member since: Mar 12, 2014

11. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

That might be possible!

7. whburling

Posts: 14; Member since: Apr 08, 2014

My understanding of EIS is that it is based on the following assumption: * movement of the camera is going to impact every sampled point exactly the same way. ie: movement that is down and to the right. will create a blur down and to the right. thus EIS is an attempt to detect the shift and make the correction to all the samples. since one has fairly good information about a pixel just before the movement, that information will be seen in the pixels that are in the blur path. Thus one can at least make an attempt to remove that information from the pixels effected. It is not a gimmick. it is an attempt to remove blur through algorithms. optical image stabilization, i believe but do not know, is the detection of movement and then a physical shift in the receiving sensor. thus, in theory, the blur never happens. as long as the movement can be detected and characterized fast enough and accurate enough then a ray of light that reaches one pixel will not be dragged across the sensor. there will be no blur to begin with. A large movement, however, may not be correctable. I do not know about these designs, so we will have to wait for advice from others. I do point out that this approach requires moving the mass of a mirror or lense or sensor which can require substantial energy even if the mirror or sensor is extremely small and the moving mechanism is solid state (ie: piezoelectric). this poses a challenge especially with a camera claiming low power usage. There is another approach which uses a gyro....the idea here, I believe, is to let the gryo mass keep movement from happening. if you hold a spinning gyro, you will experience how hard it is to move it. Thus the constant spin of the gyro does not demand huge power to cope with instantaneous moves, but instead requires power over the long term to keep the mass spinning at the desired rpm. I thihnk this is old technology. i think today people use non moving gyros to characterize the entire movement and then use that information to correct the image either through EIS or through OIS it is awesome that we have so many wonderful ways to do things. It points out the creativeness of people and the ability of nature to teach us principles. It also underscores the value of competition.

8. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

OIS is movement of lens or sensor. Almost all OIS's are lens moving.

9. itsdeepak4u2000

Posts: 3718; Member since: Nov 03, 2012

But what about the quality as compared to OIS?

19. Kamehameha

Posts: 44; Member since: Apr 21, 2014

Apple has some of the best EIS algorithms in the smartphone industry. It's not much worse than a good OIS system.

20. express77 unregistered

Put bigger battery, better specs and no restrictions please.

23. PhoneArenaUser

Posts: 5498; Member since: Aug 05, 2011

"Put bigger battery, better specs..." Maybe. "...and no restrictions please." No way!

26. cse.vicky unregistered

Stop making thinner phones .... !! Put Bigger battery, unless you put nano fuel cells :P

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.