x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • "Sources" say AT&T isn't really spending $150 million to promote the Lumia 900

"Sources" say AT&T isn't really spending $150 million to promote the Lumia 900

Posted: , by Scott H.

Tags :

We reported previously that AT&T may spend up to $150 million dollars to promote the Nokia Lumia 900. Those sources are now being contradicted by other sources that say AT&T is not in fact spending anywhere near that amount. Confused yet?

We know that a monster promotional budget is being brought to bear on behalf of the Lumia 900 (and by association Windows Phone, which has failed to catch on in the States). AT&T itself indicated that the Nokia 900 launch will exceed that of the original iPhone in terms of promotion. Reports that the budget reaches $200 million or more floated around, and yesterday’s report that AT&T was going to foot $150 million adverting budget was just the latest in a long line of similar rumors.

Now, sources speaking to The Verge are claiming that AT&T is not spending anywhere close to $150 million, that the real number is in line with “any high-profile device launch.” Who is right? With dueling anonymous sources it’s sort of difficult to say. This could simply be spin, trying to deflect away from AT&T’s investment in case of a failure, or it could be someone in the know trying to correct an erroneous report.

We tend to believe AT&T’s own words; when they say that this launch will be their biggest ever, we see no reason to not believe it. Whether that number is truly $150 million is another thing – would $137 million qualify as “nowhere near” in corporate boiler-plate? Of course it may be that while the launch itself is the largest in the network’s history, Microsoft and Nokia may be footing most of the bill. Perhaps AT&T really is only spending “average high-profile” device dollars, with the rest of the budget coming from the deep pockets of Microsoft and Nokia.

Given that Nokia is really spending Microsoft’s money, it may be that Microsoft is fronting most of the moola for this effort – certainly they are the ones with the most at stake.

sources: The Verge; AdAge

  • Options

posted on 10 Apr 2012, 16:03 3

1. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


posted on 10 Apr 2012, 16:04

2. CommentBoxEnforcer (Posts: 99; Member since: 13 Feb 2012)

No s**t

posted on 10 Apr 2012, 16:20 2

3. skymitch89 (Posts: 1363; Member since: 05 Nov 2010)

Funny, I just saw a fairly good commercial on tv promoting the Lumia 900. What's also funny is that it was basically against an Android phone.

posted on 10 Apr 2012, 18:41 1

4. kcombs (Posts: 275; Member since: 15 Dec 2010)

data connection issues, and other flaws. yeah it's going to sell like hot cakes!

posted on 10 Apr 2012, 21:44 2

5. Lucas777 (Posts: 2137; Member since: 06 Jan 2011)

dont count ur chickens (or lack thereof in your case) until they hatch

posted on 10 Apr 2012, 21:47 1

6. dvdaddy (Posts: 1; Member since: 10 Apr 2012)

I was curious to check out the Lumia 900 on Sunday April 8th. So I went to my local mall, but then remembered it was Easter Sunday. Every major mall was closed that day.
Decided to go back to same store yesterday. This was a AT&T corperate store. I was expecting a whole bunch of window posters, signage in store, big display, salesperson talking it up. Found nothing! No Lumia 900..signs..displays..nothing at all..
Was this phone released on April 8th? If so, who was the bright person from Nokia or AT&T or Microsoft who picked a major holiday to release this phone? Didnt anyone look at a calender?
Best Buy in the mall didnt have it either.
Seems like a lame release with so much riding on this phone.
BTW I have the Galaxy Nexus.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories