"Sources" say AT&T isn't really spending $150 million to promote the Lumia 900

"Sources" say AT&T isn't really spending $150 million to promote the Lumia 900
We reported previously that AT&T may spend up to $150 million dollars to promote the Nokia Lumia 900. Those sources are now being contradicted by other sources that say AT&T is not in fact spending anywhere near that amount. Confused yet?

We know that a monster promotional budget is being brought to bear on behalf of the Lumia 900 (and by association Windows Phone, which has failed to catch on in the States). AT&T itself indicated that the Nokia 900 launch will exceed that of the original iPhone in terms of promotion. Reports that the budget reaches $200 million or more floated around, and yesterday’s report that AT&T was going to foot $150 million adverting budget was just the latest in a long line of similar rumors.

Now, sources speaking to The Verge are claiming that AT&T is not spending anywhere close to $150 million, that the real number is in line with “any high-profile device launch.” Who is right? With dueling anonymous sources it’s sort of difficult to say. This could simply be spin, trying to deflect away from AT&T’s investment in case of a failure, or it could be someone in the know trying to correct an erroneous report.

We tend to believe AT&T’s own words; when they say that this launch will be their biggest ever, we see no reason to not believe it. Whether that number is truly $150 million is another thing – would $137 million qualify as “nowhere near” in corporate boiler-plate? Of course it may be that while the launch itself is the largest in the network’s history, Microsoft and Nokia may be footing most of the bill. Perhaps AT&T really is only spending “average high-profile” device dollars, with the rest of the budget coming from the deep pockets of Microsoft and Nokia.

Given that Nokia is really spending Microsoft’s money, it may be that Microsoft is fronting most of the moola for this effort – certainly they are the ones with the most at stake.

sources: The Verge; AdAge



6. dvdaddy

Posts: 1; Member since: Apr 10, 2012

I was curious to check out the Lumia 900 on Sunday April 8th. So I went to my local mall, but then remembered it was Easter Sunday. Every major mall was closed that day. Decided to go back to same store yesterday. This was a AT&T corperate store. I was expecting a whole bunch of window posters, signage in store, big display, salesperson talking it up. Found nothing! No Lumia 900..signs..displays..nothing at all.. Was this phone released on April 8th? If so, who was the bright person from Nokia or AT&T or Microsoft who picked a major holiday to release this phone? Didnt anyone look at a calender? Best Buy in the mall didnt have it either. Seems like a lame release with so much riding on this phone. BTW I have the Galaxy Nexus.

4. kcombs

Posts: 275; Member since: Dec 15, 2010

data connection issues, and other flaws. yeah it's going to sell like hot cakes!

5. Lucas777

Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011

dont count ur chickens (or lack thereof in your case) until they hatch

3. skymitch89

Posts: 1453; Member since: Nov 05, 2010

Funny, I just saw a fairly good commercial on tv promoting the Lumia 900. What's also funny is that it was basically against an Android phone.

2. CommentBoxEnforcer

Posts: 99; Member since: Feb 13, 2012

No s**t

1. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010


Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless