Samsung Galaxy Core Prime with 64-bit Snapdragon 410 chip appears at the FCC, headed to Boost Mobile

Samsung Galaxy Core Prime with 64-bit Snapdragon 410 chip appears at the FCC, headed to Boost Mobile
Another day, another Samsung smartphone gets certified by the FCC. This time we're dealing with a US-bound, entry-level Android smartphone labeled as the Samsung SM-G360P. According to the papers, it is a CDMA phone with LTE support on bands 25, 26, and 41, which makes it compatible with Sprint's cellular network. However, the phone is most likely to pop up on the shelves of Boost Mobile as it is the MVNO's customer service telephone number printed on the handset's FCC label.

Moving onward with our investigation, we found out that the SM-G360P could be a variant of the Samsung Galaxy Core Prime, which was leaked not long ago via Indian retailer Flipkart's web site. The list of preliminary specs for the device includes a 4.5-inch LCD dispay with 480 by 800 pixels of resolution, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 SoC with 32- and 64-bit support, four Cortex-A53 cores with a 1.2GHz top clock speed, and 2GB 1GB of RAM. There appears to be a basic, 5MP camera on the phone's back, and the front-facing cam is said to have a resolution of 2 megapixels. All of this is ran by Android 4.4.4 KitKat, treated to a dose of TouchWiz.

Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Core Prime, or whatever Boost Mobile decides to call it, could be a decent offering for buyers on a very tight budget. Given the evidence that has piled up, we're willing to bet that an official announcement is coming sooner than later.


source: FCC, Primelabs
phone images via SamMobile

Related phones

Galaxy Core Prime
  • Display 4.5" 480 x 800 pixels
  • Camera 5 MP / 2 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 410, Quad-core, 1200 MHz
  • Storage 8 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 2000 mAh(10h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

20 Comments

1. deanylev

Posts: 234; Member since: Mar 11, 2014

2GB of RAM is very nice. Finally 1GB of RAM is dying. Now 16GB of storage needs to die...

7. hurrycanger

Posts: 1756; Member since: Dec 01, 2013

16gb of storage is still quite new for mid-range smartphones by now. Many phones at the same price range still go for 8gb with a few having 16gb, like the Galaxy Avant, ZTE Zmax, Moto G. Some flagships costing way over $500 still go with 16gb of storage (Galaxy S5, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, and a variant of the LG G3 to name some that I know). There is the Moto X 2014 starting at 16gb, too, which costs $500. It's gonna take some time till that happens. On devices at the $200-$300 price range, I doubt they're gonna get 32gb until at least the end of 2016. Anything sooner would be well appreciated though, haha.

9. itsdeepak4u2000

Posts: 3718; Member since: Nov 03, 2012

But 480 by 800 is a problem.

11. hurrycanger

Posts: 1756; Member since: Dec 01, 2013

Yeah, if this is over $200, 480p is quite a joke. Moto G at $180 already offer a pretty good 720p display. Personally, I have no problem with 480p phones though as long as they are priced right. The Galaxy Light and Lumia 635 are both in 480p, but I like both of them for the display. Not sharp like 720p or 1080p devices, but viewing angles are good and colors are good. I've seen displays of higher resolutions with much crappier quality (540p display of the Alcatel One Touch Fierce for example). Even after using the One M8 and Note 3, the Lumia 635 still looks alright to me (my Galaxy Light broke already, lol). PA also fixed about the ram now. This phone has only 1gb of ram. It'll probably be less than $200, maybe way less since it's a Boost Mobile phone. In that case, 480p shouldn't be a problem. And I would like to mention that the LG Optimus L90's display looks really great even with a 540p display. I would say it looks even better than my Moto G 2013 most of the time despite having lower ppi. So yeah, I mean, low pixel density displays if done right can still be quite good.

12. sgodsell

Posts: 6911; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

800x480 plain and simple should die. I would never recommend it to anyone. Its just that simple, especially when you know that there is inexpensive great smart phones that do offer you 1280x720, like the Moto G. The other thing I believe phonearena got wrong is the CPU for the A53 410 CPU is listed from Qualcomm as a 1.4ghz CPU. So why wouldn't Samsung make this device run at 1.4ghz instead of 1.2ghz? If you bought knowing that these CPUs from Qualcomm support 1.4ghz, then why would you not want to run at their full potential of 1.4ghz. It seems like a waste to me.

16. nokia12

Posts: 610; Member since: Nov 19, 2013

its 1gb only .. it came back from the dead

2. Bertelgeus

Posts: 126; Member since: Oct 15, 2014

Yet another Galaxy? A53? They never learn.

3. LetsBeHonest

Posts: 1548; Member since: Jun 04, 2013

Yeah. Specs are nice . But too many models. Now core prime?? Seriously?

4. laughmi

Posts: 283; Member since: Oct 28, 2014

2GB of RAM and just 480*800 is epic fail. No super amoled deserves less than 100$. Samsung has rusted the low and mid range phones by cutting on at least one crucial feature on the phone.

6. deanylev

Posts: 234; Member since: Mar 11, 2014

Ya I guess 1280x720 & 1.5GB might of made more sense. Even 1GB I guess, the Moto G did fine with it.

8. Nick_T

Posts: 184; Member since: May 27, 2011

Sorry, guys. We double-checked the data, and it turns out that the phone has just 1GB of RAM. Or at least that's what Geekbench data suggests.

13. sgodsell

Posts: 6911; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

Check the CPU as well again. Because Qualcomm lists the specs of their Snapdragon 410 CPU with a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. So why would it be running at 1.2ghz instead of 1.4ghz. Of the model number of this A53 410 cpu is 8916. Then it runs at 1.4ghz.

5. HugoBarraCyanogenmod

Posts: 1412; Member since: Jul 06, 2014

Samsung is going desperate mode no doubt, to increase device sold, is to make even more variance device and flood the market

10. Mfa901

Posts: 291; Member since: Jul 14, 2012

Same as my galaxy core except chip set and android 4. 4

14. bubbadoes

Posts: 1225; Member since: May 03, 2012

another day..another Samsung product. Galaxy Core Prime...wth. smh..and you wonder why you are losing money. you need a separate division just to give all these phones a model number and name

15. PK1983

Posts: 215; Member since: Aug 08, 2012

Why when you can get better phones for the same or less $$$ from Moto or Nokia?

17. gigaraga

Posts: 1454; Member since: Mar 29, 2013

Wow isn't it possible to create an article without using that childish line 'Another day, another Samsung'?

18. gagakiller

Posts: 176; Member since: Oct 08, 2014

galaxy core prime NEO is coming next WEEK !

19. alexvv

Posts: 165; Member since: Oct 16, 2013

samrtphones have moved to Quad-HD screens or even more, you can buy a HD smartphone for 150 euro and a Full-HD for less than 250 and samsung releases 200-300 euro phones with WVGA screens. Then they wonder why their phones don's sell anymore.

20. 0xFFFF

Posts: 3806; Member since: Apr 16, 2014

Samsung! Not because I'm excited. But because Samsung makes new models like a factorial.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.