Qualcomm net profits slide 47% in Q2, job cuts coming up
posted by Victor H. / Jul 23, 2015, 4:08 AM
Qualcomm seemed to be on the path to become the ubiquitous chip maker for smartphones, the Intel of the ARM smartphone world, but then something happened. It’s hard to nail down what disrupted the success of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips, but it seems that Apple’s launch of the first 64-bit chips started a transition that has not ended up all that well.
Net profits take a deep diveQualcomm has now reported a 47% drop in net profits in the second quarter of 2015 (third fiscal quarter for Qualcomm). The net income of the company now stands at $1.2 billion, a slide from the $2.2 billion it recorded in Q2 2014. Total revenue amounted to $5.8 billion in Q2 2015, down 14% from the $6.9 billion income recorded in the same period last year.
Shipments of the MSM series of chips (used mostly in smartphones) were actually flat at 225 million units, but it seems that the company now makes less money from that business.
Qualcomm has lost 20% of its market value in the last year, and now, it’s announcing some big job cuts: the company will lay off 15% of its workforce in a major restructuring aiming to cut expenses. The job cuts are planned to take place until the end of fiscal 2016 and should result in annual savings of $1.1 billion. Additionally, Qualcomm will cut share-based compensation by $300 million, for a grand total of $1.4 billion in savings.
Activist Qualcomm investors have been pushing for the company to split its consistently profitable licensing operations and its not so consistently successful chip making division, and that is another option that seems to be on the table, but no official news about this are announced so far.
As to the future of Qualcomm chips, we expect to see the custom 64-bit Qualcomm 'Kryo' core made using the non-planar FinFET architecture in consumer devices in the beginning of 2016, meaning that Qualcomm could have no true 'hero' device with a Snapdragon chip in the busy Holiday season (a few devices with Snapdragon chips are coming up, but the high-profile Galaxy Note is expected to ship with a Samsung Exynos chip). On the low end of the spectrum, we are seeing Chinese vendors adopt MediaTek chips en masse, and it's a segment where Qualcomm has to play catch up. It's worth remembering that Qualcomm was fined $975 million in China for violating anti-monopoly laws, and a similar investigation is underway in Europe.
Posts: 44; Member since: Jun 27, 2015
'If ' dragon 820 overheat 'then' Rip Qualcomm...
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 4:10 AM 8
Posts: 688; Member since: Jun 16, 2015
It is incredible what an influence Apple has on the industry. One swift and surprising move from Apple and a massive earthquake shakes the complete industry making former dominant players questioning their existence. Lets be honest, the situation in which Qualcomm is in right now is a direct result from Apple's A7 CPU.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 5:20 AM 2
Posts: 1612; Member since: Oct 14, 2012
It's nothing to do with Apple. Qualcomm just been lazy. It is time for them to step up their game and improve relationships with other market leaders in the same space. You are really not a Well-Manicured-Man.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 5:46 AM 9
Posts: 372; Member since: Jun 13, 2012
"Qualcomm seemed to be on the path to become the ubiquitous chip maker for smartphones, the Intel of the ARM smartphone world." Uh no Intel chips don't overheat and then have to be throttled. Intel will soon be Intel of the smartphone world.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 11:08 AM 0
Posts: 1354; Member since: Oct 05, 2011
Not really. We have seen this before where QC was caught off guard when Nvida came from out of the blue with dual core processing (Tegra SoC) and QC had its back to the wall and had to go back to the drawing board and response a year and a half later with it's first dual core SoC. QC IMHO is a company that management seems to be lazy and not really conducting RD that well. QC always seems to get leap frog in the SoC sector.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 9:23 AM 2
Posts: 1285; Member since: Dec 30, 2014
Qualcomm deserved it, I pity the staffs.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 4:14 AM 6
Posts: 252; Member since: Feb 12, 2015
There's no amount of PR or Marketing that can make forget on people's minds that a 810 would overheat on simple tasks like opening a camera on a Z3V. Or overheating like a frying pan on a M9... You better hope the throttle works on One Plus 2, or you gonna get a lot more people angry as well. Don't fail us with 820, take 805 or 801 as a reference.. You're digging your own grave and Sammy shown you that it doesn't need you.. One day we all wake up surprised that major OEM made a deal with Sammy and they start using Exynos on their flagships, and that's the day the dragon will be slain.. Because they thought competition couldn't beat them.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 4:48 AM 4
Posts: 1276; Member since: Mar 22, 2014
But the OnePlus PR team is trying too hard ..... gotta give mad props to them though lol
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 5:18 AM 0
Posts: 16; Member since: Mar 29, 2014
Dragon slayer 810/820 -> Rip Dragon Seriously I think They need to focus on selling the 801/805 and 808 with cheaper price now is better than go around w the 810/820, leave the high-end for SS if you cant and battle with mediatek now before you lose both the market.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 5:02 AM 1
Posts: 1276; Member since: Mar 22, 2014
Kinda reminds me when Intel released a half-arsed cpu, I think it was Pentium 4, many people got angry then AMD seized the opportunity but it didn't take too long before Intel took the crown again....We might see MEDIATEK taking over soon.... I hope Qualcomm learned their lesson, they paid the price of slacking too much...
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 5:10 AM 1
Posts: 1043; Member since: Sep 28, 2013
This is the semiconductor industry: you rest on your laurels and, in the blink of an eye, an eager competitor eats your business up. The bean counters reveled at the cash in the bank, billions, instead of investing in R&D, taking risks to create the technology of the future and to remain at the top of its game. QCOM has been dominated by bean counters and lawyers for too long. So, those investors want to split it up? QTL licenses the technology created by QCT in the past, most of it related to CDMA and WCDMA. Since LTE and 5G was and is being designed from the ground up to avoid a company to dominate the related IP, QTL will have a decreasing income and, without QCT to add new IP to its portfolio, it'll quickly become merely a patent troll and go the way of others like it, such as SCO. QCOM has ceased to be a technology company a decade ago, when it's become a willing beach of fund managers.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 8:21 AM 0
Posts: 1354; Member since: Oct 05, 2011
QCOM has been dominated by bean counters and lawyers for too long. So, those investors want to split it up? QTL licenses the technology created by QCT in the past, most of it related to CDMA and WCDMA. Since LTE and 5G was and is being designed from the ground up to avoid a company to dominate the related IP, QTL will have a decreasing income and, without QCT to add new IP to its portfolio, it'll quickly become merely a patent troll and go the way of others like it, such as SCO. QCOM has ceased to be a technology company a decade ago, when it's become a willing beach of fund managers. Could not agree more!!! Especially the last line - You hit the nail right on the Head
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 9:28 AM 0
Posts: 448; Member since: Sep 25, 2012
When Samsung used their own Exynos processors obviously this will heavily impact on Qualcomm. Losing tens of millions of sales to the s6 / s6 edge alone is already crippling. Lets estimate there to be 20m shipments of s6 / s6 edge. If Qualcomm was to sell their latest snapdragon cpu to Samsung for $50. That is already 1$ billion lost. I'm guessing here but as you can see from this example of the impact caused. Not to mention other vendors who decided not to use snapdragons due to their overheating issues.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 12:54 PM 1
Posts: 520; Member since: Jun 22, 2015
First they fail to quickly release a 64-bit processor like Apple did in late 2013 with the A7 and then they release a snapdragon 810 processor that causes smartphones to overheat (such as the xperia Z3+), causing Samsung to go with it's exynos chip instead (losing a major client) and now Qualcomm is facing the consequences. They better do a brilliant job with the 820 if not they are facing an uncertain future ahead.
posted on Jul 23, 2015, 4:30 PM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):