Qualcomm, Apple exchange verbal punches at end of infringement trial

Qualcomm, Apple exchange verbal punches at end of infringement trial
Apple and Qualcomm are facing off in another trial where Apple has been accused by the chip maker of infringing on its patents. In this particular case, Qualcomm alleges that Apple used three of its patents without obtaining a license or permission. One patent is for technology dealing with internet connectivity, and another covers graphic processing and the consumption of energy from a phone's battery. The technology protected by the third patent controls how traffic is routed between the modem chip and the apps processor. This makes it easier for an app to download data.

UPDATE: According to Reuters, Judge Gonzalo Curiel of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California has ruled in favor of Apple. The judge said that Qualcomm was obligated to pay Apple close to $1 billion in royalty fee rebates. Apple's contract manufacturers that assemble the iPhone, like Foxconn, would pay Qualcomm billions of dollars a year in order to use Qualcomm technology in Apple's smartphones. Apple would reimburse its contract manufacturers. Apple and Qualcomm had a deal under which Apple would receive a rebate on some of the royalties Qualcomm received as long as Apple didn't complain about Qualcomm in court, or with regulators.

According to CNET, both sides got to present their closing arguments yesterday. Qualcomm accused Apple of hiding something by not showing its former engineer and co-inventor of the internet connectivity patent, the actual wording of said patent. The engineer, Arjuna Siva, had already testified that he was not an inventor while working for Apple. The latter's closing argument focused on Qualcomm's motivation for filing the suit. Apple's counsel, Juanita Brooks, said that the only reason Qualcomm took Apple to court was because it no longer was the exclusive supplier of modem chips for the iPhone. While Qualcomm was the sole supplier of the component from 2011 to 2015, in 2016 the company had to share the business with Intel. That practice continued in 2017, and last year Apple used Intel modem chips exclusively.

Qualcomm is asking the court to award it damages of $1.40 for each iPhone sold from July 2017, when the suit was filed. Meanwhile, don't forget to circle March 26th on your calendar; that's the day the International Trade Commission (ITC) is expected to decide whether to place an import and sales ban on certain iPhone models in the U.S. Last September, ITC Judge Thomas Pender ruled that Apple had infringed on one Qualcomm patent, but refused to order the iPhone ban that Qualcomm asked for, saying that such a ban would be against the public interest. The full commission is reviewing the matter and is expected to make its final ruling a week from next Tuesday.

FEATURED VIDEO

14 Comments

1. Venom

Posts: 3823; Member since: Dec 14, 2017

Two infamous patent sharks suing each other all because of greed.

3. Vancetastic

Posts: 1755; Member since: May 17, 2017

That’s what makes the world spin. Yay.

4. domfonusr

Posts: 1094; Member since: Jan 17, 2014

… and that's also what makes the attorney's wealthy. Yay!

5. Vancetastic

Posts: 1755; Member since: May 17, 2017

Ain’t it great?

6. domfonusr

Posts: 1094; Member since: Jan 17, 2014

Indeed... YAY!

2. blingblingthing

Posts: 980; Member since: Oct 23, 2012

Apple infringed on 3 patents? I thought Apple was the industry's innovator?

7. domfonusr

Posts: 1094; Member since: Jan 17, 2014

Wow... Apple one, Qualcomm zero. Looks like Qualcomm is going dowwwwwnnn!

8. obedchuni

Posts: 338; Member since: Jun 16, 2014

In your genius mind

9. someguy2261

Posts: 259; Member since: Feb 12, 2016

They ruled apple infringed on Qualcomm's patent and they won't ban them. Why even have patents them , they always claim the Chinese infringing on patents.

10. someguy2261

Posts: 259; Member since: Feb 12, 2016

They should ban the iPhone.

11. CTHR100

Posts: 26; Member since: May 12, 2017

According to cnet apple owes Qualcomm. So I'm confused. And because I don't post a lot I can't share the link.

12. monkeyb

Posts: 414; Member since: Jan 17, 2018

So if im understanding correctly. Apple won a billion and lost another case worth $31million. Its a win for both technically but QC lost the war.

13. domfonusr

Posts: 1094; Member since: Jan 17, 2014

It sure seems that Apple is being favored above Qualcomm... both are bullies, and I was curious as to which side would be the bigger, more established, bully - and it is becoming clearer that Apple is the bigger bully if this kind of trend holds for any length of time.

14. mootu

Posts: 1541; Member since: Mar 16, 2017

"So if im understanding correctly. Apple won a billion and lost another case worth $31million. Its a win for both technically but QC lost the war." Not really, the big cases are still underway and are yet to be ruled on.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.