New list of Samsung handsets that are upgradeable to Android KitKat excludes the Galaxy S3 GT-I9300
posted by Florin T. / May 07, 2014, 12:49 PM
Here are the devices that should get KitKat starting this month (May): Galaxy Note II LTE SM-N7105, Galaxy Note 3 Neo SM-N750, and Galaxy S III LTE (Sprint’s variant already received the update last week). The month of June is expected to bring KitKat to the following Samsung handsets: Galaxy S4 Mini (LTE and non-LTE), Galaxy Mega 5.8, Galaxy Mega 6.3, and Galaxy Grand 2.
Unfortunately, it looks like the KitKat update for the Galaxy S III GT-I9300 (the version without LTE) “has been cancelled due to unsolved problems.” Still, S3 GT-I9300 users should hope that Samsung will eventually find a way around these alleged problems. We’ll certainly keep an eye on this, and let you know when official details are available.
source: Sam Mobile
Posts: 902; Member since: May 08, 2013
That shows how much Samsung respects its consumers.
posted on May 07, 2014, 12:56 PM 11
Posts: 2478; Member since: May 06, 2009
It's a phone that was released 24 months ago. I've had three phones since my Galaxy S 3, it's time for them to stop support on it. They promised 24 months of updates. Its 24 months after launch. Done.
posted on May 07, 2014, 1:04 PM 4
Posts: 7365; Member since: Mar 16, 2013
One major thing people don't seem to have a clue in regards in storage. All phones have some type of flash storage (eMMC, ...). Then after a period of time the storage and speed will degrade. Even if you introduce things like trim in Android 4.3+. Ultimately its just better to upgrade the device, or don't store things on your phones, or store things on external storage (micro SD, cloud) ;-) I can't wait for project Ara to take off.
posted on May 07, 2014, 1:35 PM 0
Posts: 2072; Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Samsung support their flagships for at least 24 months. However, since the release of the S3, there have been four updates to the Android OS. Samsung have provided updates for 4.1 & then a direct update to 4.3. Android KitKat (4.4) was also released during this 24 month period. Hence, Samsung should also provide the KitKat update for the S3. Updating just the LTE variants of the phone shows Samsung doesn't have confidence in its UI to holdup on 1GB of RAM. Android KitKat has been optimized for devices with even 512MB of RAM. So there's no reason that the international S3 with 1GB of RAM can't handle KitKat. This is not great support from Samsung you know.
posted on May 07, 2014, 1:26 PM 1
Posts: 339; Member since: Mar 06, 2014
Are you here just to speak garbage ot did you actually read the article.? It clearly states that update for int s3 was cancelled due to some unsolved problem.! Now if they cant fix it .. then there's no point in releasing an update as it will degrade the performance of the device.
posted on May 07, 2014, 1:59 PM 2
Posts: 7365; Member since: Mar 16, 2013
I just heard from a friend that there are some GPU issues with the older Mali-400MP4 GPU. KitKat is more demanding on the GPU, since they updated the requirements to KitKat. It requires Opengl ES 2.0 now. I know that GPU is suppose to handle 2.0, but I heard there is something wrong with Samsung's Exynos version of the Mali-400MP4 GPU. Its not fully up to the 2.0 spec. That's what I was told today.
posted on May 07, 2014, 3:45 PM 0
Posts: 341; Member since: Sep 20, 2011
There is no such 'older Mali-400MP4', they're similar any minor revision (if any) share the same design basis. The IP design or core might undergo several changes at the silicon level (eg leakage fixes or minor thermal desigb improvements) but the GPU as seen by the software is identical. KiKat GPU usage is neither higher nor does it rely on any newer specific OpenGL ES extensions (Mali-400 already supports ES2.0). The problem here is rather centered around this particular Exynos SoC and its rather troublesome binaries/blobs or sources. Keep in mind that it was originally targeted at ICS when first released so it takes quite some time to implement new changes introduced by newer Android versions in this specific Exynos kernel. The latter has never been upgraded and Samsung just kept backporting patches from newer kernel versions (3.4) into theirs for each major Android firmware update (notice that all S3 kernel versions are 3.0.18 instead of 3.4.x). Samsung just kept backporting things into their half baked kernel, problems were already apparent by the 4.3 upgrade which had issues related to the power management IC for instance. It was inevitable that they'd run into issues down that road and all seems to indicate that this has just started to happen, at least with either their messed up sources or PDK.
posted on May 07, 2014, 8:06 PM 0
Posts: 4974; Member since: Mar 04, 2010
While we are at 24 months from the S3's release, 4.4 KitKat was released end of October last year, that's 7 months ago. This was the phone that put them on Apple's level as far as phone sales go. As I understand it the only one of the S3 variants not getting the update is the model with Samsung's own processor. I could understand when they didn't upgrade the Galaxy Nexus since Ti pulled out of the mobile industry and there were no drivers for it. But this is their own processor. KitKat was released when the S3 was 17 months into it's life cycle, they should at least honor their commitment, and not drag their feet and say now that they can't do it. Just yesterday the RAZR Maxx HD was announced to start a soak test for 4.4.2. If they can do it I can't imagine why Samsung with all their resources couldn't do it as well. Many are saying it's just business and that's true. But why stop there? Why not stop providing updates and force everyone to upgrade their phone every time a new major OS update comes out? It'd be a lot more profitable for the OEMS that's for sure.
posted on May 07, 2014, 8:08 PM 0
Posts: 889; Member since: Dec 05, 2012
OMG.. Ppl making big fuss about nothing (so many comments here for nothing) N/a means information is Not Available. ppl must wait for Samsung's official announcement that it wont be available. This pic is only showing that information is Not AVailable...
posted on May 08, 2014, 3:11 AM 0
Posts: 3; Member since: May 07, 2014
The Galaxy S3 GT-I9300 is very well capable of Kitkat. Touchwiz is to blame.
posted on May 07, 2014, 12:57 PM 1
Posts: 200; Member since: Apr 27, 2012
please explain this to me.....in the update to 4.3 the os itself uses some amount of ram and some is used by the skin....now comes kitkat which uses less ram than 4.3....so what kind of stupid things were they planning to put in the already crappy touch wiz that overall consumption of kitkat increases???
posted on May 07, 2014, 1:05 PM 0
Posts: 549; Member since: May 20, 2012
LTE version uses touchwiz also, so your point is invalid. Its the LTE radio
posted on May 07, 2014, 6:42 PM 2
Posts: 297; Member since: May 15, 2012
Unsolved Problems my ASS !!! Samsung just say it out lout that you will not give KitKat to the International versions ... The RAM thing is just Bull Crap , then how is samsung's new handsets with 512mb ram running KitKat ???
posted on May 07, 2014, 1:36 PM 1
Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012
What happened to the Galaxy Light? Since it's similar to the S4 mini, I'm assuming it's getting the update as well?
posted on May 07, 2014, 4:34 PM 1
Posts: 4275; Member since: Jun 26, 2011
Just because it's similar doesn't mean it's getting the update, especially since it's only available on a single carrier. Galaxy S2 (Snapdragon S3, 1 GB RAM, 480x800 display, available around the world) - updated to 4.1 Galaxy S Blaze (Snapdragon S3, 1 GB RAM, 480x800 display, only available on T-Mobile) - left at 4.0.
posted on May 08, 2014, 12:21 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):