Moto X+1 benchmark leaks, confirms a 2.5 GHz quad-core Snapdragon 801 processor
posted by Daniel P. / Aug 08, 2014, 4:37 AM
Moto X+1 is expected to be announced soon, together with the Moto 360 smartwatch, judging from the bunch of leaks pouring for both devices lately. This latest one depicts the Moto X+1 handset, codenamed as Motorola XT1097, being benchmarked on Geekbench, showing results consistent with a processor of the latest Snapdragon family.
Moto X+1 might sport a Snapdragon 800 chipset. The clock speed of 2.46 GHz that is shown now, however, indicates that Motorola's new flagship will be powered by the fastest Snapdragon 801, the MSM8974-AC that is in the Galaxy S5, for instance.The Geekbench database reads the processor as MSM8974, which lead previous leakers to the deduction that
|SoC Version||Model||Max Krait 400 CPU clock||Max Adreno 330 GPU clock||ISP||eMMC||Dual SIM, Dual Active||Memory interface|
(Z1, Note 3, G2, G Pro 2)
|v2||Snapdragon 800||2.26 GHz||450MHz||320MHz||v. 4.5||NO||800MHz|
(Z2, Z2 Tablet, Find 7)
|v3||Snapdragon 801||2.36 GHz||578MHz||465MHz||v. 5.0||YES||933MHz|
|v3||Snapdragon 801||2.45 GHz||578MHz||465MHz||v. 5.0||YES||933MHz|
The rest of the claimed specs are a 5.2" 1080p display, 2 GB of RAM, and 32 GB of storage plus a microSD slot. A 12 MP rear, and a generous 5 MP front camera round up the offering, while everything should be backed up by a decent 2900 mAh battery capacity. All in all, it sounds like a great update to the unique always-on Moto X, which will bring Motorola's portfolio in sync with the times in terms of specs, so we can't wait for the flagship to be unveiled next to another drool-worthy gear - the Android Wear poster kid, also known as the Moto 360 smartwatch.
Posts: 699; Member since: May 06, 2013
why not the 805 the 801 is too old and slow
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 4:40 AM 1
Posts: 1239; Member since: Aug 05, 2014
801.... Slow!!!! You must be using it as a workstation at NASA.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 4:50 AM 19
Posts: 67; Member since: Jul 31, 2014
805 is not much better than 801.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 5:16 AM 12
Posts: 582; Member since: Jun 28, 2012
If you're using a SD800 Device, better jump straight to SD810.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 8:00 AM 1
Posts: 6737; Member since: Mar 16, 2013
It would be nice, but the 810 is not out yet. We would all love a 64bit 810 CPU in our phones. The only one from Qualcomm that will be out soon that supports 64bit is the 410 and its a cortex-A53 and not a cortex-A57
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 10:41 AM 0
Posts: 515; Member since: Jul 15, 2014
801 ? what a joke
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 4:48 AM 0
Posts: 1774; Member since: Jul 30, 2013
My moto X has a custom S4 pro and beats the s**t out of S5 in terms of lag and smoothness, its all about optimization and the fact that moto doesnt use a custom skin like most of other OEM do. Lesson No. 55.342
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 6:51 AM 12
Posts: 555; Member since: May 29, 2014
Honestly anyone saying that the 801 processor is slow shouldn't be allowed to reproduce... While I love the idea of more power you have to stop for a minute and think "why"... There are no apps/games that truly use the power we have now let alone the 805. If they can wrap this up with that sweet bamboo back in a pretty affordable package I think this will be a hit. This is the area that I've been critical of moto in the past is with the midrange specs but this will fly I'm betting.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 5:22 AM 20
Posts: 327; Member since: May 23, 2014
Bezels way too thick
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 5:24 AM 3
Posts: 1276; Member since: Mar 22, 2014
Now it makes absolute sense to avoid the 801/805 all together if you're coming from a Snapdragon800 device. thank you Qualcomm for saving me a lot of money!
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 5:28 AM 2
Posts: 1774; Member since: Jul 30, 2013
Yes cause a phones cpu is all it matters, when Moto X came out it had custom S4 which was a year old cpu compared to the 600/800 of that years flagships and it had 10 times less lag than galaxy S4.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 8:18 AM 2
Posts: 320; Member since: May 13, 2014
800, 801 , 805 are more than enough but the true upgrade will be Android L and 64 bit processor. So I will wait untill smartphones with those specs arrive. Untill then my Note 3 has everything I need.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 5:53 AM 0
Seems to me there is a shortage of snapdragon 805 SoC-s,think about it,galaxy s5 prime is the only phone with S 805.Whyyy??? You ask why Snapdragon 805,i say futureproofing especially now when 64bit SoC are around the corner.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 6:01 AM 0
Posts: 322; Member since: Aug 12, 2013
I would like to contest that screen size. Why can' they just leave it at 4.7 or give it a modest jump to 4.8/4.9. 5.2 isn't needed really.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 7:21 AM 2
Posts: 182; Member since: Jun 18, 2013
LOL all these benchmarking trolls in here bragging about processor speed. Go ahead, navigate around and pull your status down and navigate your apps in your S5 and G3 and that lag is still there, even with those high end processors. I love my G3, but I can't deny that it lags even with its beefed up specs because the OS is not optimized properly and smoothed out.
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 7:29 AM 1
Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009
Considering how well the Moto X holds up with a processor that snobs considered underpowered last year, I think that it's safe to categorize anyone whining about the processor choice in the Moto Algebra as a "blithering idiot."
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 7:41 AM 5
Posts: 2072; Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Motorola has always been at the forefront in the Android space, even though they haven't been very successful. Their Motorola DROID smartphone kicked off Android's dominance with its awesome design and keyboard, and the Moto 360 will make Android Wear more appealing to consumers with its circular watch dial. Keep it up Motorola!
posted on Aug 08, 2014, 7:43 AM 4
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):