Judge rules FCC must produce data about suspicious comments received during net neutrality debate

Judge rules FCC must produce data about suspicious comments received during net neutrality debate
A U.S. District judge ruled last week that the FCC must turn over records to a journalist who would use the data to identify those who uploaded bulk comments to the FCC in reference to net neutrality. A number of these uploads were allegedly submitted in other people's names without their permission. Net neutrality is the Obama-era rules that force ISPs and wireless providers to treat all content streams the same. It prevents them from getting paid to stream content over "fast lanes" and also blocks them from throttling or blocking content that they disagree with.

Last year, the Trump-era FCC voted to repeal net neutrality and the latter was erased from the books last June. FCC chairman Ajit Pai was supposed to use comments from U.S. citizens to help him form a decision about whether the FCC should keep or repeal net neutrality. One would have assumed that the majority of comments were against net neutrality based on Pai's subsequent actions.

But as it turned out, a report last year put together by Emprata LLC said that 90% of the 21 million comments (a record number, by the way) received by the FCC were form letters already typed out, and millions of other comments were suspicious for other reasons. Many were sent using fake names, or used the names of other people without their permission. The company says that overall, the majority of Americans were not in favor of repeal, which the FCC did anyway. 13 million comments were sent in support of net neutrality, while 8.6 million comments were in favor of repeal.

In September 2017, a freelance journalist named Jason Prechtel, requested some documents from the FCC under the Freedom of Information Act; these documents would have identified those who sent the agency comments in bulk. Many of those comments were said to have been sent in other people's names without their knowledge. After the FCC refused to turn over the data sought by Prechtel, the journalist sued the FCC resulting in the ruling against the regulatory agency.


The FCC has not commented on the ruling, which was announced last week, and has not decided yet whether it will appeal. For his part, Prechtel expects to receive the data, analyze it, and post the results online.

source: ArsTechnica (image credit: Datacenter)

FEATURED VIDEO

4 Comments

1. mike2959

Posts: 692; Member since: Oct 08, 2011

Judges have for a very long time interrepted law. Same in this case. If there isn’t a clearly defined law, well that’s up to congress. Judges are out of control. Follow the damn book and stop making your own crap on, of course based on political party affiliation.

2. middlehead

Posts: 428; Member since: May 12, 2014

Someone is trying to investigate obvious fraud, and this judge is ordering the FCC is finally cooperate. The political stupidity going on here is from the FCC. The only thing the judge has done wrong is to not go far enough.

3. Soundjudgment

Posts: 370; Member since: Oct 10, 2016

Good! It's about time someone investigated those piles of submitted Form-Letters that were all mysteriously produced from the exact same boiler-room template. They will soon find out it was all total BS from the FCC and A Pai in the face.

4. AfterShock

Posts: 4146; Member since: Nov 02, 2012

To help Isp Recoup costs of heavy bandwidth users? They like Banks make yoy profits, and just where does this cost that gets paid by Isp go to exactly? Sounds like something renamed from the books of.. "The cost of doing business" passed on to customers as the cost of doing business with them in any form they name it. So if infrastructure improvement costs are carried by customers, do these cost subside once national coverage is reached or it just becomes normal as this is accepted now. Not likely and look forward to more pain and suffering costs by carrier to give you access to their costly services. Rant over.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.