It's a deal: AT&T to acquire DirecTV

It's a deal: AT&T to acquire DirecTV
The boards of AT&T and DirecTV held special meetings on Sunday where they approved a plan for the latter to be bought out by the former for $95-per-share.

Rumors of the deal surfaced early last week and it was leaked then that a deal could be announced within days, and so it has, with both boards approving the deal simultaneously and unanimously. AT&T will acquire DirecTV in a mix of stock and cash.

AT&T trumps this deal as a creation of a “unique new competitor with unprecedented capabilities in mobility, video and broadband services.” It is expected that AT&T will use this new asset to augment U-Verse offers, which will, in turn, free up bandwidth demands in those markets.

DirecTV is already sold at many AT&T retail locations, and with a portfolio that includes NFL Sunday Ticket, and other sports oriented content offers, AT&T will be able to better bundle these services with its wireless line-up, including expanded delivery of content to mobile devices.

AT&T has issued a number of commitments as part of the transaction. AT&T plans to deploy broadband services to more rural areas by using fixed-wireless and fiber installations. A stand-alone broadband package with guaranteed pricing for three years. There will be a nationwide DirecTV pricing package, consistent for three years.

AT&T also commits to net-neutrality, regardless of any rulings that come from the FCC that may vacate such requirements. Finally, AT&T re-committed to participate in next-year’s spectrum auction, although it does point out the caveat “as long as there is sufficient spectrum available in the auction to provide AT&T a viable path to at least a 2x10MHz nationwide spectrum footprint.” The company notes that the deal with DirecTV will not stop it from spending at least $9 billion in the auctions in 2015.

Of course, regulators in Washington, DC, a few states, and some governments in Latin America need to sign off on the deal. Assuming everything moves forward, that process will take about a year.

source: AT&T



1. fzacek

Posts: 2486; Member since: Jan 26, 2014

AT&T made a big mistake. Television is dyeing away and internetainment is taking over...

3. HASHTAG unregistered

Uh if you say so.

5. Augustine

Posts: 1043; Member since: Sep 28, 2013

I hear you. I myself cut cable about a couple of years ago and don't miss TV. However, by joining the ATT's Internet infra-structure with DTV's media deals, the move away from conventional TV to on-demand content might actually be easier to both merging companies.

6. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010

Ummm, while that may be true - Uverse is not your standard Cable TV service - I think this is a big deal for AT&T because of the football package it can now sell with UVERSE....lmao

7. darkkjedii

Posts: 31538; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Boy that was a dumb post.

8. fzacek

Posts: 2486; Member since: Jan 26, 2014

Why exactly? Television is eventually going to become obsolete due to internet services like Netflix and YouTube being cheaper and more convenient...

10. darkkjedii

Posts: 31538; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Bug someone else please.

11. fzacek

Posts: 2486; Member since: Jan 26, 2014

You're so stubborn...

17. darkkjedii

Posts: 31538; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Not stubborn, just not interested in a pointless debate with you.

14. marcski07

Posts: 600; Member since: Apr 25, 2014

the geekiness on this one is too damn high.

15. Omarc07

Posts: 574; Member since: Nov 12, 2012

I dont think tv is going away anytime soon I know me and other people who are not paying for Netflix and wont ever pay for it.Besides if u had uverse u dont need Netflix I had dish,direct tv and at&t uverse n uverse was the best!! Its awesome!

23. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010

I watch almost all of my TV on the internet now....tons of free shows and movies are available...

27. JunitoNH

Posts: 1946; Member since: Feb 15, 2012

Huh? Spell checker not working today?

29. fzacek

Posts: 2486; Member since: Jan 26, 2014

Internetainment is a word. look it up on Urban Dictionary...

30. fzacek

Posts: 2486; Member since: Jan 26, 2014


38. bigdawg23

Posts: 467; Member since: May 25, 2011

If anyone thinks that Cable Companies and Phone Companies will continue shrink in Television subscribers and not jack up internet rates is crazy Also look at more channels are starting to demand subscribers for television to access their new content(ABC). I can see the day come that says if you have television internet it will be X price and if you don't it will be X times 3. Television providers will not allow to lose all the subscribers to internet. They will also demand much higher fees from Amazon and Netflix.

2. 0xFFFF

Posts: 3806; Member since: Apr 16, 2014

“a unique new monopoly with unprecedented monpoly power in mobility, video and broadband services.” It seems with each new merger of corporate giants, America takes another step further into fascism. "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

18. james1

Posts: 97; Member since: Mar 16, 2013

The cable industry is already a monopoly anyway. Providers agree to set a certain price that's the same everywhere, and you rarely find two providers serving in the same area. Take for example Comcast and time warner cable, where there is one, there isn't the other.

36. Augustine

Posts: 1043; Member since: Sep 28, 2013

It is a monopoly sponsored by city councils around the country which granted them exclusivity for a many years, creating a barrier to competitors.

4. WillieFDiaz

Posts: 127; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

I think that the FCC should tell AT&T if they want DirecTV, they must first divest all their fiber and U-Verse to competitors in those markets. With the new spectrum acquired they will NOT be able to use it for mobile services at any point in the future, and all spectrum must either be used for television services or low-cost rural internet with actual real-world data usage limits (none of this 2, 5, 10GB usage, think more like 250-300GB usage limits or more). If AT&T wants to use the tried and untrue, "We will be able to expand into rural markets with DirecTV" line like they tried to use with T-Mobile merger that failed, then they should be forced to actually do so, and under highly regulated conditions. They are the ones that want to expand so badly, then let them, but not at the expense of the customer. They own copper landline in rural areas they could extremely cost efficiently and effectively convert majority of this to fiber, or use DirecTV spectrum to relay calls from base stations in rural areas to the central offices that carry fiber, thus providing some form of next generation services.

12. robert26101

Posts: 107; Member since: Mar 21, 2014

Um no AT&T should be able to use the spectrum they require for mobile services.

9. clevername

Posts: 1436; Member since: Jul 11, 2008

I hope the FCC doesn't approve. This merger is bad, especially when you remember the comcast-time Warner deal. It'll basically be those two and Verizon. Some local companies as well but those get bought up all the time. Soon enough there will be only 3 national ISPs. Let the secret price gouging begin. Who's ready to pay 70/mo for 15mb down?

24. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010

The FCC has a chairman that used to be a lobbyists for companies like COMCAST - so, you know whose side the FCC is on - luckily it is a committee and not everyone on it is on the big telecoms' payroll...yet...

35. InspectorGadget80 unregistered

You're right bout that. Remember when they try to buy tmobile? Consumers make their plea and at&t drop their bid for buying them.

13. Topcat488

Posts: 1417; Member since: Sep 29, 2012

AT&T buying DirecTV is as bad as Facebook buying What'sApp, IMO... What is this world coming to, when the customer is left out in the cold by these companies. Customer Service and spying aren't a big asset in these companies!

16. darkkjedii

Posts: 31538; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Your opinion doesn't matter, you didn't spend the 50 billion dollars. AT&T knows what's it's doing. They've been around a long long time.

25. networkdood

Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010

Nope, hate to break it to you - this is a website that was designed to garner opinions....ask phonearena - if you are on your period, then just do not post.

31. 0xFFFF

Posts: 3806; Member since: Apr 16, 2014

Remember, cut the iCampers some slack. It must be getting uncomfortable in the tent that they are camping in. Imagine darkjedii, his wife, Sauce in a little tent now for a few days, with many long months ahead of them. It is a true test of their iFaith.

34. Augustine

Posts: 1043; Member since: Sep 28, 2013

AT&T has been around for just a decade, after the old AT&T that Alexander Bell founded went belly up and was acquired by SBC.

19. corporateJP

Posts: 2458; Member since: Nov 28, 2009

No more bundle billing and discounts for Verizon customers. LOL

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.