How important is Optical Image Stabilization to you when looking at a smartphone camera?

How important is Optical Image Stabilization to you when looking at a smartphone camera?
As the smartphone, as a commodity, becomes more and more standardized, we're quickly getting to a place where even "white box" vendors have the basics right, and above the minimum acceptable threshold. Even wildly unpopular companies can nowadays get you a smartphone with the same hardware as the big brands out there, but at the faction of the cost. This trend has been progressing steadily, and why would it not -- after all, the average Joe is looking for a few basic functions out of his smartphone and that's it.

And as these otherwise tiny companies are beginning to offer more and more competitive products, it's becoming increasingly hard for us and consumers both to really separate a really complete package from one that just gets the basics rights. What's more, even big brands are betting on different areas, while leaving others as low priority. This, as some of you may have been noticing, has given a rise to content we do that aims to objectively measure parts of the equation that are not necessarily a priority for a particular brand. Cameras with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) are one such example, but we do like to know our audience which gets us to this poll.

So what say you, is OIS a feature you're actively looking for a camera? And if so, how important is it to you? Or, do you happen to not care at all? You tell us!

How important is Optical Image Stabilization to you when looking at a smartphone camera?

I regard OIS highly, so it's very important to me
It's definitely a nice extra, but not a game-changer for me
I'd rather have manufacturers spend their effort and resources elsewhere



1. walnuttt

Posts: 153; Member since: Apr 11, 2014

Very important as it makes photo quality superb, less shaky and blurred.

9. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

It is a 'must-have' feature on my next smartphone purchase. No OIS, I keep my Maxx and don't use my upgrades.

10. PunyPoop

Posts: 752; Member since: Jan 18, 2013

Not needed, my Xperia Z2 has steady shot, and takes beautiful pics at night.

13. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

Try doing an apples-to-apples compare between the Z2 and an L1520 in low light, then post back.

20. PunyPoop

Posts: 752; Member since: Jan 18, 2013

Give me L1520, then I might consider comparing it.

21. MrTzr unregistered

Steady shot doesn't help unfortunately when taking pictures.

25. buccob

Posts: 2968; Member since: Jun 19, 2012

It does... it is basically a fancy name for digital image stabilization

27. MrTzr unregistered

Thanks, I didn't know that. I thought that the DIS (SS) was only available on the Z2 when taking video's. I hope that it works as fine as on the video's, as SS seems to do a good job to keep the video steady.

26. boosook

Posts: 1442; Member since: Nov 19, 2012

As an Xperia user, I say that it's not the same thing at all. Steady shot is a digital stabilizer, i.e. it just boosts ISO so you can have shorter exposure times but at the expense of quality, while an optical stabilizer can avoid camera shake and keep ISO low at the same time. The results are impressive, you just have to try it and you won't come back. Optical stabilizers have been one of the greatest innovations in camera technology during the last 10 years, if not the greatest. It's definitely just abot time for this technology to be massively deployed in smartphones too. Just as noone would buy a digicauple of m without OIS right now, it will be the same with smartphones in a couple of years, when even samsug and apple will come to it.

35. Svelte

Posts: 2; Member since: Jan 27, 2014

phase detection autofocus is also good for fast focus in video mode especially for tracking and moving object.

2. jaytai0106

Posts: 1888; Member since: Mar 30, 2011

It would def be a nice feature. But for someone who doesn't like much photo or taking photo in more optimal condition like me. It's not a deal breaker. I'm not on the go too much when I have to take picture. Maybe in the future it will be an important for me, who knows :D

3. buccob

Posts: 2968; Member since: Jun 19, 2012

This is a very nice thing to have, if the manufacturer care to put it in the device... It helps with Video and low light photography but I rarely shoot video clips (specially if I am the one moving) and I already take satisfying low light pics without it... so not a must for me, yet.

4. itsdeepak4u2000

Posts: 3718; Member since: Nov 03, 2012

Why is 3rd option given? Not needed IMO. OIS is a huge plus plus.

5. hassoups

Posts: 473; Member since: Jun 06, 2013

Look at the nexus 5 with OIS. Probably the worst camera on a flagship. OIS, imo, is overrated everywhere but Nokia's cameras period.

6. MarkArigayo

Posts: 240; Member since: Dec 18, 2013

OIS was the main reason why I decided to try a G2, and it really works as expected.

11. marlboro

Posts: 94; Member since: Mar 27, 2014

same here! but for now I will bring my z1 all day this spring break!!!

7. pwnarena

Posts: 1129; Member since: Feb 15, 2013

not that important as shown by apple and sony.

14. shuaibhere

Posts: 1986; Member since: Jul 07, 2012

Add samsung to the list...note 3 great for daylight photos...

15. shuaibhere

Posts: 1986; Member since: Jul 07, 2012

Add samsung to the list...note 3 is great for daylight photos...

8. mokhtar

Posts: 405; Member since: Jan 06, 2014

not important for me ... i have steady shot and it works so great , and with the new steady shot in the z2 would be great .. cant wait to test it

12. sip1995

Posts: 1771; Member since: Feb 07, 2014

I remember when Nokia introduced OIS on the lumia 920....that was awesome.

16. Jason78

Posts: 281; Member since: Apr 10, 2013

1-2 years ago I would have said it was nice to have. Today it is a requirement.

17. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

Phones already take awesome pictures and videos without OIS, but OIS sure makes them even better!

18. kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

Its not 100% necessary, but it definately helps, My moto g takes amazing pictures when it is in good light, now if its in low light? forget it

19. NokiaFTW

Posts: 2072; Member since: Oct 24, 2012

OIS is one of the main reasons why I picked up a Lumia 1520.

22. p51d007

Posts: 704; Member since: Nov 24, 2013

I'm kind of old's not that important to me, because I've been taking photos with an SLR, now a dSLR for 30 years. I know how to hold a camera STILL, or, if it's something moving, I don't use the default camera program, but have one that mimics iso, shutter speed & f/stop. It's nice to have, but not that important for my usage. I'd rather they spend the time on making the sensor size LARGER and improve the lens elements, and give us the option to shoot in RAW mode to avoid the post processing headaches associated with a heavily compressed jpeg image.

23. drgoll

Posts: 1; Member since: Apr 14, 2014

Extremely important, I have essential tremor and couldn't take a good picture without it

24. AppleHateBoy unregistered

Must have IF it works well and everything else(like software, optimizations, sensor size, MP etc.) has reached a particular level.

28. wargreymon

Posts: 764; Member since: Nov 05, 2013

After using G2 with OIS and then G Flex which is same but without I realized how awesome OIS is. So many less blurry pics its laughable at using burst mode etc and then trying to find a non-blurry pic one phones without OIS.

29. alrightihatepickingusernames

Posts: 474; Member since: Dec 29, 2013

I don't use the camera on my phone that much so I wouldn't miss it. DIS would be enough for what I do but if an OEM puts OIS on a phone that I want I certainly won't complain.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.