House once again passes controversial CISPA cybersecurity bill

House once again passes controversial CISPA cybersecurity bill
The US House of Representatives has once again passed the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), after last year the bill was shot down in senate. CISPA is a bill arising from cybersecurity threats and provides a legal channel for companies to share information between each other and the government about hacks and threats.

Backed by some of the largest tech companies like Microsoft and Facebook last year, this time around - after the massive public outcry - those big names have backed their support. Companies like Mozilla and Reddit, along with advocacy organizations ACLU and EFF warn about CISPA being used as a pre-text for corporations to share private information about their users with the government. This would put the privacy of users at risk.

The bill passed with a bilateral push from both republicans and democrats with a final vote of 288 yeas and 127 nays. Within the democratic party there were more opposing the bill than supporting it as 92 approved it and 98 opposed it.

Democratic representative Jared Polis of Colorado, one of the most outspoken CISPA critics, argued that the bill is too vague and opens the door to searching through user data: "There are absolutely no protections with regards to what is done with this information," he said.

The bill proponents on the other hand did not shy away from even using the recent Boston Marathon bombing tragedy to make their case: "In the case of Boston they were real bombs, in this case they're digital bombs. And these digital bombs are on their way," Texas Republican Mike McCaul said.

Still, the CISPA bill needs to pass approval at Senate before becoming a law. We’ve also heard about the possibility of Obama issuing a veto. The saga about Internet freedoms and better cyberprotection continues.

source: GovTrack,



1. Aeires unregistered

Unfortunately the genie is out of the bottle, don't expect to ever get back to the days when the government had more important things to take care of than collecting data on it's citizens.

4. ZeroCide

Posts: 816; Member since: Jan 09, 2013

Tru that.

2. gwuhua1984

Posts: 1237; Member since: Mar 06, 2012

I don't understand how is the House passing a bunch of bills that aren't supported by the people. It seems more like they're voting for their own interest than the people they represent.

3. threed61

Posts: 259; Member since: May 27, 2011

Given that the industrial worlds economy and infrastructure are all computerized and online, what are the reasonable alternatives to protect both from those individuals and groups who care only about destruction?

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.