Galaxy S4 to Galaxy S7: a camera comparison spanning 4 generations of Samsung smartphones


It's no secret that Samsung's flagships have some of the best cameras around. For years now, Sammy has vied to push the boundaries of smartphone photography further and further and has definitely earned itself the reputation for stellar photo quality.

One could mark the start of the company's more serious push for camera improvements with the Galaxy S5's release. The phone featured a fresh technology in its sensor, called ISOCELL — basically, individual pixels are separated by tiny walls, which reduce cross-talk, which means sharper details and less color bleed. The Galaxy S6 improved upon this by adding an optical image stabilization (OIS) module in the mix, for less shaky cam and easier night shots. The S7 improved the phase detection autofocus system even further, now called Dual Pixels.

But, of course, we can talk about specs and generations of tech all day, but what does any of this mean in terms of actual photos? Let's cut the talk about pixels and look at some actual images!

Here's just a quick table of how the Galaxy S cameras have evolved specs-wise for the past 4 generations:

Galaxy S4Galaxy S5Galaxy S6Galaxy S7
Resolution13 MP16 MP16 MP12 MP
Pixel size1.14 μm1.14 μm1.14 μm1.4 μm
ApertureF2.2F2.2F1.9F1.7
OIS--YesYes
Sensor size1/3.06"1/2.6"1/2.6"1/2.5"

Galaxy S4Galaxy S5


So, what were the major changes here? The Galaxy S5 now has a higher-res sensor, as seen in the table above, and its size grew a little accommodate them, but not proportionally. As a result, its individual pixels became just slightly smaller, which should impact the camera's speed in collecting light but not by a noticeable margin, considering the 0.02 μm difference. Well, at least that's what we assume when looking at the specs on paper.

In reality, we were surprised to find that it's much harder for us to take a non-blurry shot with the Galaxy S5 than it is with the Galaxy S4. Both of these phones don't have an OIS module, mind you, and we were taking extra care to hold them as still as possible. Of course, there's probably much more at work here that impacts camera performance than the ever-so-slightly smaller pixels on the S5.


When you look at the shots we took, it's hard to define a clear winner. By today's standards, both cameras are mediocre performers and both produce very similar results. The one thing that surprised us is the bokeh effect (background blur) that's much more prominent with the Galaxy S5. And that's nice, sure, but image quality between the S4 and S5 is easily comparable. Sometimes the S4 adds some more noise, but at other times, the S5 just smudges up details.


Once we take the devices indoors, performance drops for both, as details are lost, and it's hard to take a non-blurry photo, due to both devices needing slower shutter speeds to capture enough light. The S5 has more vibrant and lively colors for sure, which is an obvious step above the Galaxy S4, but it's still not enough to compete with today's standards.


Galaxy S5Galaxy S6


2015's Galaxy S6 further evolved the camera with a mechanical optical image stabilizer and a wider lens aperture of F1.9. On paper, this should mean less "shaky hands" effect in photos, making it especially easier to take photos in darker environments, and a shallower depth of field (more prominent "bokeh", a more visible distance between the object in focus and background, etc.).


And in reality? Well, we have to say the difference in detail between the Galaxy S5 and Galaxy S6 is quite noticeable. The latter is easily superior in every battle we pit both phones in. The S6 handles dynamic scenes better, always comes up with better, sharper detail, and has its focus on point much more often than the Galaxy S5.


Indoors, the wider aperture lets more light in and the optical image stabilizer makes it much easier to take a non-blurry image. We found ourselves re-doing shots on much rarer occasions with the S6, which is definitely an important point when it comes to actual usability and positive experience with the camera. Indoor images have a lively quality and fine details that just can't be found on the Galaxy S5.


Galaxy S6Galaxy S7


And now we arrive at the final step of Sammy's camera evolution thus far. The Galaxy S7 dialed the camera resolution down, from 16 MP to 12 MP, but don't panic — image quality is not all about the megapixels. The lower count of individual pixels meant that they could be a bit bigger, stretching from 1.12 μm to a rather impressive (for a smartphone) 1.4 μm. To repeat ourselves — bigger pixels means faster, more efficient light collection, ergo we get faster shutter speeds and less noise, which allows for finer details to shine through.


Moving on to the photos, you can see the performance of both cameras is easily comparable. Sometimes, one might say, the Galaxy S7's camera produces colors that are a bit more natural and mature, but that's not consistent. Both snappers perform equally well outdoors and you'd be happy with any of the two cameras. Indoor performance is once again improved, with more natural colors and finer, sharper details present in each shot. When the light is less-than-ideal, we'd say the Galaxy S7 really manages to outshine the S6, if only by just a bit.


If there is a huge difference to be pointed out, it's in the ease of use of the camera. The Galaxy S7's “Dual Pixels” autofocus technology is blazing fast and can really spoil the user. Its shallow depth of field, due to the F1.7 aperture, also unlocks some more creative potential with bokeh and focus play, and makes the shooting experience that much more fun.


Conclusion and full gallery


While each generation has something better than the one before it, we feel it's safe to say that the most important jump in Sammy's cameras over the past 4 generations was the one made between the Galaxy S5 and Galaxy S6. The OIS module, the wider aperture, and the new software all make a pretty huge difference in image quality and in overall user experience. So, while users that upgraded from the S4 to the S5 probably didn't feel much of a performance bump in the camera department, anyone switching from an S5 to a next generation Samsung smartphone will have a pretty great time with their new camera.

Now, the S7's camera is better than the one on the S6, but only by a margin. We'd say that the Galaxy S6 is pretty consistent at capturing amazing scenery and its camera easily ranks among the best even today, a year and a half after its release. Of course, the S7 has a few advantages, like better low light performance, but it's hardly a dramatic improvement.

Now, we are anxious to see what the Galaxy S8 brings about. Could it make the same jump in quality that we witnessed between the S5 and S6?



FEATURED VIDEO

43 Comments

58. Hamsterbytes

Posts: 1; Member since: Nov 06, 2017

I went from s4 to s7 edge. Without playing around with any settings, the s4 took great pics and videos, especially at dusk and nite. The s7 sucks. All dusk, nite pics and videos are way too grainy and don't telephoto anything because it will be indecipherable . So I got online to see what other's had to say. It was the same. You had to fine tune the f'kg phone to take nite pics and vids. If I wanted to have to adjust the camera I would just buy a dedicated camera. The s4 did not need a degree in phone camera adjusting to get great nite pics and vids. So read online reviews of s4 to s7 camera and you will see I am not talking B.S. the s7 camera sucked.

45. Shamoy

Posts: 112; Member since: Dec 28, 2013

In daylight, my Sony Xperia XZ beats all of these.

41. Daniel7

Posts: 28; Member since: Nov 05, 2016

Where is a statement from TyrionTheWise?

40. steodoreben

Posts: 379; Member since: Sep 26, 2013

I love S5's natural color and S7's fast Dual Pixel AF.

30. Joms_US

Posts: 201; Member since: Oct 02, 2016

Just for fun, you could have put iCrap 7 here and watch its devastating defeat.

27. andriodfanboy1

Posts: 171; Member since: Jul 22, 2014

Im using s5 since a year and trust its a pain in - - - - to get accurate focused shot mostly it can't even focus and sometimes if it manages to get focus. I also used s4 when it came for a year and trust me s4 focus was much better in any condition and picture quality is almost identical

23. 27satz

Posts: 158; Member since: Apr 28, 2014

Am i the only one to see the S4 performs better than S5!

12. lalalaman

Posts: 638; Member since: Aug 19, 2013

s4 was good

11. lalalaman

Posts: 638; Member since: Aug 19, 2013

s4 was soooooooooooo good

16. trojan_horse

Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016

^^ Yay! I still have my S4, duh... It's camera was top dog back in 2013.

9. nebula

Posts: 1009; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

Wood trunk photo S4 and S7 images are nearly identical in appearance and quality. Now I know S7 has same old S4 camera.

15. Macready

Posts: 1832; Member since: Dec 08, 2014

"Now I know S7 has same old S4 camera" Nonsense. The S7 has a larger sensor, much larger aperture, much faster focusing, better dynamic range (see highlights plus shadow detail in the shots of the iPhone against the tree) and much better low light qualities (mostly a result of the first 2 factors).

18. trojan_horse

Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016

^^ Right... And needless to say, the S7 has OIS which the S4 lacked... The saying of the S7 having "the same old S4 camera" is beyond laughable.

21. nebula

Posts: 1009; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

You must be Mr Takemeliterrally right ?

20. nebula

Posts: 1009; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

I am stilk looking for that"much" factor in the wood trunk image. For sure s7 was fitted with old s4 camera .

22. Macready

Posts: 1832; Member since: Dec 08, 2014

Anyone with a long history of using different cameras should know that when all circumstances are right, there can be relatively little difference between a mediocre camera and an awesome camera. Even pictures from a point and shoot and DSLR can look relatively similar when the light and subject permits so. It's the allround capabilities and when things get challenging that differences become clear.

26. nebula

Posts: 1009; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

The thing is S4 shot is even better .

29. marorun

Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015

I agree s7 is way superior but i do find both those picture pretty similar..

7. shield

Posts: 900; Member since: Sep 12, 2015

S4 is better than S5, S5 is better than S6. S7 is Best.

17. Tyrion_Lannister unregistered

S5 is better than S6! Hell no.

19. trojan_horse

Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016

And shield also said the S4 is better the S5... WTF.

39. Tyrion_Lannister unregistered

S4 and s5 were quite comparable.

5. twens

Posts: 1191; Member since: Feb 25, 2012

For me the s7 edge's camera is on a different level. I've not yet used any phone that takes satisfying pictures than the s7E. Coming from a 6s plus

36. SupermanayrB

Posts: 1188; Member since: Mar 20, 2012

The Note 7 camera was above that level. I had it until all the BS & am now in S7E. Give this phone the Note 7 UI, features & camera & it would be THE best phone out, period.

4. peegieislim

Posts: 68; Member since: Dec 14, 2016

S7 images are only good when they are compared to computer generated unreal graphics.

6. s.mrabet

Posts: 147; Member since: Oct 26, 2011

Lol, who you think you're fooling?

3. hwb01

Posts: 355; Member since: Apr 17, 2014

That snowman picture is some crazy difference, didn't know the S6's camera improved that much over the S5

25. ebilcake

Posts: 1234; Member since: Jul 16, 2016

Galaxy S6 camera is still very good, I had no complaints with the camera at all, OnePlus 3 camera is a downgrade in that department.

33. vincelongman

Posts: 5836; Member since: Feb 10, 2013

IMO S5->S6 is the biggest jump of Samsung's S Series Especially in low light, it went from their weakness to their strength

2. fancollo

Posts: 130; Member since: Dec 30, 2015

i think the S7 has a technological advantage being fast etc, but the actual picture... i do not really think it's among the best. oversharpening and oversaturated, loss of details compared to other cameras do not make it good.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless