For a second time, Appeals Court refuses to issue stay on injunction against Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1
posted by Alan F. / Jul 19, 2012, 2:35 PM
Samsung's request to expedite the appeals hearing was also shot down by the appeals court. The court did say that Samsung could move things along faster by filing its opening brief as soon as possible. At the same time, the court said that Apple will not get any extensions for filing its response.
believed that Samsung had a chance to win at trial, it would have stayed the injunction which means it believes that Apple will win its case against the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1. As Samsung has said, this is not a major issue for the company.
More important is the injunction on the Samsung GALAXY Nexus, which has received a stay of the injunction ordered by the District Court. Considering that Sammy did get the stay on this case, the appeals court thinks that Samsung has a better shot at prevailing in this case. Of course, it doesn't hurt that Samsung has already removed local search from the phone. And as we already pointed out, it has preemptively removed local search from the AT&T and Sprint versions of the Samsung Galaxy S III. The so-called Siri '604 patent relating to universal search is at the heart of the patent issue between the two manufacturers. The unlocked GSM version of the Samsung GALAXY Nexus with Android 4.1.1 Jelly Bean installed, has returned to the Google Play Store where it can be purchased.
Samsung GALAXY Nexus OS: Android 4.3, 4.2.2, 4.2.1, 4.2, 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0.1, 4.0 View Full specs
- Display 4.7" 720 x 1280 pixels
- Camera 5 MP / 1.3 MP front
- Processor TI OMAP4460, Dual-core, 1200 MHz
- Storage 32 GB
- Battery 1750 mAh(8.33h 3G talk time)
Sounds like the legal department needs to have a talk with the PR department. As for the Siri patent, every phone manufacturer should be in an uproar over this, not just Samsung. That patent is far too vague and broad reaching for any company to possess. Dumbing down smartphones isn't good for anyone.
posted on Jul 19, 2012, 2:57 PM 5
apple saw that galaxy tab and galaxy nexus is a serious competition to iPhone and iPad, that's why they sued Samsung because it is the one of the biggest phone and tablet makers out there,they saw that its not worth suing sinking companies or small ones and the patent thing was the excuse because every one copies everyone that how it happens.
posted on Jul 19, 2012, 3:34 PM 4
Posts: 431; Member since: Apr 15, 2010
What's funny is there's an article on Yahoo! stating that a court in Britain is forcing Apple to run ads that Samsung did NOT copy them. ;-P
posted on Jul 19, 2012, 4:23 PM 4
Posts: 285; Member since: Nov 27, 2011
you mean this ?http://www.phonearena.com/news
posted on Jul 19, 2012, 6:18 PM 1
Posts: 366; Member since: Dec 08, 2010
Wow US must been smart when we became independent from British rule. Just goes to show US courts supports apple and uk courts are bought by google. Or am I just noticing that.
posted on Jul 19, 2012, 7:33 PM 1
Posts: 971; Member since: Dec 13, 2011
no, Apple paid to court in US and common sense wins in UK ;)
posted on Jul 20, 2012, 2:51 AM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):