Feds drop court battle with Apple after someone helps the agency unlock a meth dealer's iPhone 5s
posted by Alan F. / Apr 23, 2016, 2:33 AM
The second case involved an Apple iPhone 5s that belongs to admitted meth dealer Jun Feng, who swears that he doesn't remember the passcode on his device. Once again, the Feds sought a court order to demand that Apple unlock Feng's phone. And once again, a third party appeared to help the FBI unlock the phone in question. This time, it wasn't an expensive security outfit (one report claims that the FBI paid over $1 million to unlock Farook's phone), but an unnamed individual who approached the FBI with the passcode to the dealer's handset. It is unclear how this individual got the correct passcode. Did he know Feng? At this point,, until the FBI reveals more information, everything is conjecture including the rumor that it was Feng himself who provided the passcode to the government.
Late Thursday, the FBI tried the passcode and it worked. No longer needing Apple's assistance, on Friday the Feds dropped their demand that Apple unlock the phone, and another court battle was prematurely ended.
By withdrawing its case against Apple, the FBI is actually shooting itself in the foot. Without appearing in court, the FBI can't challenge a 50-page decision from a magistrate judge from a previous case. That decision states that the government does not have the legal authority to force companies like Apple to unlock its devices. The government was hoping to attack that ruling so that Apple and other tech firms couldn't cite it in any future court showdown.
Posts: 3951; Member since: Oct 03, 2015
Good because all the back and forth was getting.
posted on Apr 23, 2016, 2:59 AM 0
Posts: 1588; Member since: Aug 15, 2011
Well, soon it will change Senates are working on pass the bill, make tech company create backdoor similar to the blackberry.
posted on Apr 23, 2016, 11:47 AM 0
Posts: 854; Member since: Apr 22, 2013
I don't think they're shooting themselves in the foot, they're waiting until they know they can get the court of public opinion on their side. They want a slam dunk, not a protracted battle.
posted on Apr 23, 2016, 3:04 AM 2
Posts: 4063; Member since: Jul 23, 2013
Or they realize that every iPhone can be hacked quickly and conveniently. So why risk losing in court and setting a precedent that might even stop them from unlocking it themselves.
posted on Apr 23, 2016, 1:03 PM 0
Posts: 41; Member since: Feb 27, 2014
Soo these days anyone can just unlock an iphone, even randomly....that ain't right
posted on Apr 23, 2016, 3:40 AM 1
Posts: 1449; Member since: Mar 13, 2016
Not anyone. I'm pretty sure the average person won't spend huge sums of money to unlock someone else's iPhone. And for those who will cause of being a isheep. I'm strictly Android.
posted on Apr 23, 2016, 5:21 AM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):