"Crystal clear" Samsung Galaxy F leaked again, this time in its full glory

The supposedly metal-clad upcoming Samsung Galaxy F has been all over the place this last month, and by now most of us have reason enough to believe that an official launch is imminent. Not to be confused with the Samsung Galaxy S5 LTE-A, the Galaxy F is believed to be both a higher-spec'd version and one in a more premium shell. This last part is corroborated by the latest, official-looking render of the Galaxy F in "crystal clear", courtesy of @evleaks.

This is not the first time we see what the alleged Galaxy F looks like, and we've even seen parts of the crystal clear version before, but now you can bask in its full glory. Once again, the phone appears to be sporting a metal or at least a metallic-looking rear shell, so we might see Samsung finally respond to consumer feedback at last. 

In terms of hardware, the Galaxy F is expected to keep the S5's novel heart-rate monitor, along with its 16-megapixel ISOCELL camera. New on the list is an upgraded Snapdragon 805 processor and probably some extra RAM. The Galaxy F is also expected to make use of a 5.3-inch, Quad HD resolution (1440 x 2560 pixels) display. If we were to venture a guess, the Galaxy F, if real, is a few months away from reality. 


source: evleaks

Related phones

Galaxy Alpha
  • Display 4.7" 720 x 1280 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 2.1 MP front
  • Processor Samsung Exynos 5 Octa, Octa-core, 1800 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB
  • Battery 1860 mAh(11h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

93 Comments

1. iMemo

Posts: 113; Member since: Feb 22, 2014

Okay... That looks cute!

32. itsdeepak4u2000

Posts: 3718; Member since: Nov 03, 2012

Speaker design on back could give it much better look.

88. steedsofwar unregistered

The front looks very attractive. The back looks ugly. Why 5.3"?

35. aayupanday

Posts: 582; Member since: Jun 28, 2012

Now that's how you imitate LG...

92. shuaibhere

Posts: 1986; Member since: Jul 07, 2012

More like LG imitating Samsung S series with G series....

38. Lampriya

Posts: 245; Member since: Oct 05, 2013

cute? Yeah only in samsung fans mind. everything about samsung is cute and innovative. I'm speechless

44. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

Isn't it the same for Apple fanboys? Like you as a perfect example.

46. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Funny because you do the exact same thing. Pot, meet kettle.

59. BobbyDigital

Posts: 2124; Member since: May 29, 2014

As do you Smurf. Let's be honest here, you're one of PA's biggest trolls. You troll almost every non Samsung related article and go on and on about how great Samsung is. You're just as bad as Mxy and the nokia/MS fanboys.

69. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Prove it. Give me five articles in the past week.

70. BobbyDigital

Posts: 2124; Member since: May 29, 2014

So now you're a liar on top of being a troll?? Wow. And I don't have to prove anything that's already common knowledge in these forums.

79. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Didn't think so. I win.

83. BobbyDigital

Posts: 2124; Member since: May 29, 2014

Seriously dude? Just because you haven't trolled yet this week, doesn't mean you don't troll. Ask anyone in these forums if you're a Samsung gambit who trolls anything not Samsung and I guarantee they'll say yes. But hey, if you can't be honest with yourself more power to you junior.

85. Run.n.Gun

Posts: 45; Member since: Nov 06, 2013

lol..PapSmur stands on the frontline when it comes to defending Samsung and that is indeed common knowledge

90. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Please feel free to direct yourself into reading comment #2.

89. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Comment #2.

52. Astoni

Posts: 649; Member since: Sep 28, 2013

Just log out.. you're even worse than zyx(can't remember the darn name) atleast he's a bit logical.. all you do i praise without any facts to back you up.

54. doejon

Posts: 411; Member since: Jul 31, 2012

at least they are trying to change something unlike apple

80. Htconem7

Posts: 7; Member since: Jun 02, 2014

I wonder if HTC and Samsung will release their respective "prime" products to counter the release of Iphone 6. Very interesting.

82. marcski07

Posts: 600; Member since: Apr 25, 2014

CEO: designers! let's redefine our design! let's make a galaxy F, as in F for Fashion! an elegant, seamless, beautiful, handset! designers: how about simply change our perforated design to brushed metal in the back and keep the perforated design in the front? that will surely perfect for FASHION, and our fans will surely gonna love the NEW design. CEO: hmm... that's good idea! that's really a MAJOR change! you guys are genius! galaxy F * c k T * r d s

2. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

No thanks. If history repeats itself (M8), aluminum = inferior reception.

6. maccess

Posts: 742; Member since: Jan 16, 2013

True.. My m7 reception isnt as good as my note 2.. But this looks quite tempting though..

31. amats69

Posts: 1527; Member since: Nov 12, 2012

Seriously? You have the HTC one m7? The phone u bash to death before? Dude pretending that you have that phone just for the sake of bashing,trolling or posting some lies is just BS..lol..right Papa smurf?

43. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Don't know if you're trying to say I have a M8 or not. M8's reception sucks. Period.

72. maccess

Posts: 742; Member since: Jan 16, 2013

I have an m7 as my daily driver even until now.. I like the phone just for the speaker and the smoothness of sense UI.. Everything else like the camera, the easily dent edge, easily hot back when you browsing or playing games and the not so great reception are the downside for me.. And please give me any link that i ever bash the m7 to death kid.. And one more, did i ever mention that i dont own an m7??

9. Supraman21

Posts: 467; Member since: Jun 09, 2010

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7984/discussion-on-material-choices-in-mobile There is no history of bad reception from the HTC One. Neither the M7 or M8

12. Zack20

Posts: 41; Member since: Dec 10, 2013

There is buddy. And I used to have M7. So saying that from experience.

16. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Use the device in person. I always get three or four signal bars everywhere in Chicago where my S5 always got five. The noticeable difference is the Wifi radios that give me 50% slower speeds. S5 gave me 108mbps and M8 gave me 50. God they blow so much.

41. Noble_One

Posts: 63; Member since: Aug 18, 2012

I believe this is true...I've never had the m7 or m8 but my evo 4g LTE definitely had reception issues when compared to the one x. The aluminum novelty wore off real quick for me personally...

68. chebner

Posts: 249; Member since: Oct 17, 2011

I don't think comparing an Evo 4g LTE to a One X is really valid when it comes to reception. Yes they are the essentially the same phone constructed with different materials but they also run on different networks. The EVO was exclusive to Sprint, other carriers had the ONE X. Your reception issue may have been related to the Sprint network and not your aluminum phone. I too had the EVO 4g LTE. While it wasn't the best phone I've ever had in terms of reception, it was miles ahead of the EVO 3D, which was plastic. The M8 is another step up from the EVO 4g LTE for reception. I've had one dropped call in 3 months and data connections are much more consistent and speedier. It helps that Sprint has vastly improved their network where I live.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.