As Windows shrinks, Android and iOS grow to overtake it
posted by Victor H. / Dec 14, 2012, 5:10 AM
And that’s not a huge surprise as smartphones and tablets are getting in everyone’s pockets. The share of Windows PCs has dropped to 29% of all Internet-connected devices, while smartphones and tablets grab a dominating 66%.
More than that, Microsoft is facing an “uphill battle,” even if it wants to regain its share.
The trend emerged earlier and bore fruits in Q4 2010 when smartphones and tablets started outselling PCs for the first time.
With 1.3 million daily activations and with an installed base of over 480 million, Android alone is expected to outgrow Windows’ installed base over the next couple of years.
To reverse that trend Microsoft will really need some breakaway hit with a tablet like the Surface, but could that really happen? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Android putting Windows into garbage bin? Boy that's a little rude LOL
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:15 AM 7
Posts: 550; Member since: Feb 23, 2012
Mobile is the present & future.it will be better if MS puts Windows 8 instead of Windows phone 8 on mobile devices.They will gain their lost market share & remain dominant forever.
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:35 AM 2
You mean Linux? Linux is hugely important as w/o it there is no Android. Linux and other open source software could not rule but it forced MS to loosen its deadly grip: consumers see more value for money and MS had to innovate more. The reason open source cannot win PC war is the lack of a viable ecosystem, but with Android it's very different.
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 6:15 AM 2
Posts: 453; Member since: Jun 29, 2012
Well lets just wait and see. as i said comparing mobile os-es and the powerhouse that is windows makes no sense. btw phone arena why isnt there a single bloody article that compares the number of windows machines in the world with the number of mac os or chrome os machines. those are all proper desktop o.s.es, not android or ios. than we would all see what the trend is...
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:20 PM 0
Posts: 94; Member since: Nov 21, 2012
No, mostly because Microsoft entities such as CEO Steve Balmer keep trash talking the competition (Android&Apple), claiming that their products are better, more advanced, and easier to use-- not really, it actually makes them look weak, desperate even. Microsoft to me has sucked as of late, only thing I use from Them is Windows for my laptop. The live tiles widgets looks stupid and isn't even original because they're getting sued for the patent by some random company. In addition, no flash support, they won't allow manufacturers to put more than dual-core processors in the phones, my guess, too expensive. Also, the manufacturers have to pay Microsoft a fee so they can sell phones, tablets, etc for their platform. Before I forget, anyone heard of the lack of internal space in the surface tablets? Just about half of the memory is already filled with the apps and files from Microsoft, which almost defeats the purpose of paying for 32 GB of internal storage when 16-17 GB is already being used. You can use a flash drive, but seriously, come on... That defeats the purpose of paying for more memory in the first place right off the bat. It's the principle folks, not everyone is stupid, and while we can afford to buy these fancy toys, it's always best to know exactly what you're paying for and if you get the best of your honest buck. Am I alone on this one?
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:27 AM 7
Posts: 973; Member since: Aug 09, 2012
Nah, I don't think Ballmer's trash talk would affect sales. People who are concerned with this ongoing OS crusade are a miniscule part of their consumer base. There are other mistakes that are costing MS which I think are: - Late entry to mobile segment - Current lack of ecosystem - Rushed launch of WP7.5, which left many basic functionality - Steep priced surface tabs I am also very optimistic about WP8 and the future of MS. Let's give it time and see how good it does. Time is all an Ecosystem takes to mature.
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:42 AM 5
Posts: 94; Member since: Nov 21, 2012
Who's to say by the time the ecosystem does mature if it'd be too late? The other platforms are more developed and have taken time to.mature. Android started small, so I guess it could work. Even so, I'm sticking with Android, it's fun, easy to use, and most of the good stuff is rather cheap, but very high end. I prefer the Samsung brand.
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:49 AM 4
Posts: 902; Member since: Sep 29, 2011
not alone but most are not as considerate of the memory. Most are concerned with it running the things they accomplish daily. Techies aside, regular people not us just want something to work that does not take long to use and provides access to everything. That is why smartphones have gained success. Most regular people are not clamoring for 64GB on their mobile devices because many do not utilize more than 16GB at best.
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 7:30 AM 0
Posts: 971; Member since: Dec 13, 2011
open source wins.....thank you for the freedom!!! finally!
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:28 AM 4
Posts: 242; Member since: Jun 06, 2012
Note : Android is not open-source, but it's way more open than WP and iOS
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:38 AM 1
Posts: 663; Member since: Aug 20, 2011
MS should have priced the surface competitively. I like the concept of the surface but it should also lead in the price as well.
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:31 AM 2
What is Atari Amiga and that before the windows??
posted on Dec 14, 2012, 5:48 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):