Apple's 'camera kill switch' patent enrages rights groups
posted by Ken N. / Jun 21, 2011, 12:17 AM
But the Save the Internet coalition has penned an open letter to Steve Jobs, discouraging the implementation of such a device. And they bring up some solid, albeit dramatic, points. Referring to the heavy use of cell phones in recent revolutions around the world, they point out that "This technology would also give tyrants the power to stem the flow of protest videos and crack down on their citizens with impunity."
In general, however, "it would give tyrants and companies the power to silence one of the most critical forms of free expression." Like we said, it's a little dramatic. And, ideally, Apple would be able to control who had access to the coded infrared device, limiting its oppressive applications.
But there are everyday situations in which the kill switch could be a problem. What if someone is assaulted at a concert, and no one is able to photograph the assailant for evidence. Some of us use our iPhones to take videos of concerts, and then violate their copyright by posting them online. But the majority of us depend on them for far more, be they photos of our puppy or videos of a national revolution.
source: Save the Internet via TUAW
Posts: 69; Member since: May 17, 2010
wow... if it actually pass and if someone did get hurt in one of the concerts will apple be sue as an accomplice? accessory of murder?
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 12:38 AM 3
Posts: 492; Member since: Jan 20, 2010
I tried to send a video MMS to security # posted at the concert, but my iPhone wouldn't let me! I was forced to just watch that little guy in orange robes burst into flames and burn himself to death. Apple and the Concert promoters are responsible for the damage to my psyche! And now I will not get a chance at $100000 from America's Funniest Home Videos either...
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 9:21 AM 2
Posts: 320; Member since: Nov 21, 2009
The people that plan to video n post the concert will just jailbreak their phone and over ride this. Seems like a huge pr mess with apples customers just to give a false sense of security to the record companies.
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 2:21 AM 2
Posts: 275; Member since: Dec 15, 2010
Or I'll just not buy apple phones anymore, I think that was all I needed to switch to Android.
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 7:49 AM 3
Posts: 1496; Member since: Apr 06, 2011
Boohoo, get over it. Apple is a business and iTunes has a good deal with the recording industry.
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 6:23 AM 0
Posts: 1515; Member since: Jun 03, 2010
This is an exact move on Apple's part that consistently irks me. If someone wants to take a chance and have their phone/camera taken away for illegally photographing concerts/ shows, isn't that the decision of that person(s) and security? I understand a certain amount of control in Apple's ecosystem, but this just blatantly crosses the line. They are trying to tell you when you can and cannot take pictures and be the phone police? People complain about government intervention, yet the same people allow Apple to control how they use their phones. Very disturbing. How many more people are going to buy into dictation from Apple? It's your device and your money. You should be able to do as you please. I sure hope this article is a premature evaluation that does not reflect a true result from Apple. John B.
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 11:00 AM 0
Where's Anonymous and LulzSec when it comes to Apple? For two (one?) organization(s) that are all about freedom (of information, the internet, and people in general) and fighting oppression I don't think I've heard one peep about the Super Nanny like control Apple exerts over it's business partners and consumers.
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 5:20 PM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):