AT&T faces a $1 billion payout for unjust mobile Internet fees
posted by Ken N. / Jun 07, 2011, 12:38 PM
So here's a breakdown of the unfair taxes. Let's say the plan as a whole cost $100 per month, and $30 of that was for mobile Internet access. AT&T was charging taxes on the $100, rather than only $70. And that is in violation of the Internet Tax Freedom Act, which prevents taxes from being imposed on Internet access between November 1, 2003, and November 1, 2014.
While AT&T probably could have put up more of a fight, the plaintiffs' lawyers have been impressed with AT&T's candor and willingness to settle: "AT&T was really forthcoming about it and did an unprecedented job of working with us," said the plaintiffs' lead counsel.
We have to commend AT&T for being so agreeable, but we wonder if their willingness to settle might be tied to their potential T-Mobile acquisition. With customer satisfaction waning, and public opinion stacked against the merger, AT&T might have figured that it would be better to take the nearly $1 billion loss, and keep their attorneys focused on the T-Mobile deal.
source: Dayton Business Journal via FierceWireless
Posts: 77; Member since: Jan 26, 2011
Interesting. How long before someone decides it would be a good idea to audit Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon?
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 1:24 PM 0
Posts: 4; Member since: Jan 06, 2011
Not sure about Sprint or T-Mobile, But i do know that Verizon hasn't taxed my unlimited data plan.
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 1:50 PM 1
Posts: 298; Member since: Apr 27, 2011
with great coverage and customer service you pay a higher price. I don't know I see VZW and AT&T like the HBO or Showtime package of Cable while Sprint and T-Mobile are the basic. However VZW also includes the Playboy channel as a bonus feature. Much like how VZW has less dropped calls vs. At&T
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 3:09 PM 1
Posts: 316; Member since: Aug 11, 2010
I had at&t and paid 23 dollars extra compared to when I switched to verizon. We had them from 2005 to july of 2010 They have taken over 1000 extra dollars from me over 5 years
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 4:29 PM 0
Posts: 18; Member since: Sep 24, 2010
Are you saying your monthly service charges were the same but your bill with AT&T was $23 a month higher because of taxes and/or surcharges? If that's your claim, I'm calling BS; I simply don't believe it.
posted on Jun 11, 2011, 7:36 PM 0
Posts: 492; Member since: Jan 20, 2010
@: TheFunnyMan Sprint is too smart recently: including unlimited data in a plan and not charging separate for it like ATT did means they can justify charging fees based on the full plan amount to pay the required taxes.
posted on Jun 08, 2011, 9:32 AM 0
Posts: 303; Member since: Nov 02, 2010
They probably knew that they couldn't win it since it was no way for them to deny it as it was written in stone and you can't fudge those numbers. I'm surprised that AT&T didn't try to get around it or may excuses.
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 1:55 PM 0
Posts: 57; Member since: May 23, 2011
The last paragraph says " AT&T might have figured that it would be better to take the nearly $1 billion loss" but I am wondering how this is considered taking a loss if they never should have been charging it in the first place? Wouldn't this just be giving back what they should have never taken in the first place?
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 1:58 PM 4
That money collected did not go into escrow. It was either paid to the government, which doesn't sound like it's the case, or it was logged as revenue and used that way. It may have been unearned, but it will still hurt coming back out the same as if it was.
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 2:23 PM 0
Strange this hasnt gotten a lot of press. I would have expected a furry of ATT customer in here complaining big time. Maybe case ATT is mostly liberals and apparently they dont mind paying up the booty in taxes....just a thought.
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 6:24 PM 0
Posts: 237; Member since: Jun 17, 2010
Verizon has already had to pay for unjust data charges, for those who were wondering...
posted on Jun 07, 2011, 6:53 PM 0
For those of you who are posting about AT&T and Verizon price difference and trying to attribute it to taxes, you're talking about stuff like a few dollars here and there. Not tens or so of dollars every bill. Someone (I forget who) said "Blah blah blah $23 difference between AT&T and verizon, blah blah $1000 over 5 years." That wasn't taxes. That's your companies discount. Verizon gets less small benefits from FAN discounts, so they charge less for base %. So they can take %19 off the full bill vs AT&T's that gives you %19 off the base plan and applicable data features as well as giving you a greater (than Verizon) discount off accessories and assorted other goodies.
posted on Jun 08, 2011, 3:05 PM 0
Okay...... 1. When are we going to get our money back? 2. There's 2.3 android updates for atrix 4G and inspire 4G? 3. Verizon wireless didn't just over tax you the customer but the government employees to just saying. 4. Not just Verizon or at&t having a cap Sprint will as well. 5. at&t cost less then Verizon!
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 1:48 AM 0
Think about it. The deal between at&t and t-mobile are looking good they have Google and other big names backing the deal Thats going to sink us due to customers all on Verizon and at&t . Are towers are jamed up now Nextel system are crashing were selling boost to gain some money the cap is smart free up the network and get little more money to better our network clearwire really messed up our network now put more money for LTE we will never see the Wimax money back. I put out my resume. Sprint won't last past next year. Good luck.
posted on Jun 21, 2011, 2:03 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):