Xiaomi Mi 5 beats Samsung Galaxy S7 and LG G5 in AnTuTu
posted by Victor H.
/ Feb 24, 2016, 2:35 AM
Asian startup Xiaomi is all the buzz in China, and it has just unveiled its much anticipated flagship phone for 2016: the Xiaomi Mi 5.
And it's a beast.
The Xiaomi Mi 5 is powered by the Snapdragon 820 system chip and while the latest Samsung Galaxy S7 and LG G5 feature the same chip, the Mi 5 is able to top the mainstream flagships in benchmarking app AnTuTu.
Xiaomi Mi 5
source: Xiaomi
Related phones
- Display 5.2" 1080 x 1920 pixels
- Camera 16 MP / 4 MP front
- Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Quad-core
- Memory
- Storage 128 GB
- Battery 3000 mAh
82 Comments
1. kobainez
Posts: 454; Member since: Apr 13, 2012
Haha poor exynos phanbois that said exynos scored 130k haha
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 2:39 AM 9
4. KillTheKardashians
Posts: 93; Member since: Feb 19, 2016
Your life must be so sad
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 2:42 AM 48
10. KillTheKardashians
Posts: 93; Member since: Feb 19, 2016
When you are older than 8 years old, Please kill yourself.
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 2:51 AM 25
14. Jason2k13
Posts: 1450; Member since: Mar 28, 2013
You do realise that the Mi5 runs on FHD right while the S7 runs on QHD? and you do realise the scores could change once the phones are available to consumers?
And yes your life must be sad to actually find it 'amusing' like you just won a lottery just because the exynos scored less, even when the scores are from pre-release phones?
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 2:54 AM 47
42. Nathan_ingx
Posts: 4769; Member since: Mar 07, 2012
Aye, it's beautiful and great.
But they could've done something like, Standard with 1080p, High with 2k and Exclusive with QHD display.
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 3:47 AM 2
52. Shocky unregistered
Not really, Samsung users can change resolution in games, for general use it doesn't matter.
On-screen 3d benchmarks are irrelevant these days.
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 5:34 AM 1
62. neela_akaash
Posts: 1239; Member since: Aug 05, 2014
Someone's Butt is hurting so much..... ouch.
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 8:54 AM 1
55. Piyath_ale
Posts: 79; Member since: Nov 02, 2015
That's the exact point here. No point of cramming every single option in to the phone if it cannot perform like a champ. Who needs Qhd. 1080p is way adequate. We must consider every aspect of the phone. Not just the display. If u want a display, go and buy a 4K TV instead. Putting so much pixels in to a tiny screen is not innovation but utter madness..
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 6:59 AM 2
80. epdm2be
Posts: 818; Member since: Apr 20, 2012
Even 4K TV's are useless without actual 4K content AND 4K broadcasts!
And no I don't consider a s**tty smartphone videoclip in 4K a proper 4K video. There are 1080P bluray demo discs with more quality and sharpness than what a crappy smartphone can deliver. Or do you really think that cinematographers from National geographic and Discovery Channel use smartphones to record those fantastic nature films?
Unfortunately it appears that consumers have more common sense than CEO's (and CTO's) from multi-billion dollar corporations.
posted on Mar 08, 2016, 3:45 PM 0
66. integrazimmy
Posts: 59; Member since: May 30, 2015
I tend to look at the final result in terms of how the phone actually behaves, bc I know that cpu benchmark scores aren't everything!! These LG and Sammy wars are just amusing!!! I would however, like to point out that Phone Arena is quite biased towards Sammy!!! If the Exynos chip would've beat the LG G5, the headlines would've probably read something like this "Samsung Galaxy S7 DEMOLISHES LG G5" or "Will LG's CPU Best Samsung's? Not this year". But since the LG G5 actually beat Samsung's, the title was quite subtle and merely informative!!! Lol!! Also Phone Arena posted that the Exynos scored around 120,000. Not even close, it barely did 116,000, so it was upped in score. Where the LG G5 was downgraded to " just above 130,000" when in reality it was closer to 135,000. Funny things if you read between th lines!!! I have an LG G4 and Imm looking forward to buying the LG G5!!!
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 9:58 AM 1
21. NoToFanboys
Posts: 3231; Member since: Oct 03, 2015
sooooo, if a person contradicts you you automatically call them fanbois? you must be a genius.
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 3:01 AM 5
45. Bm888
Posts: 517; Member since: Jul 06, 2015
I don't know but I have a hunch Samsung played it safe with their exynos at launch and waited to see benchmarks of sd with other oems. .wait the final release coz Sammy might tweak its exynos and blow people's mind.* Samsung game
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 3:54 AM 2
54. Piyath_ale
Posts: 79; Member since: Nov 02, 2015
Y bother about others? How about your life? Miserable?
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 6:55 AM 0
32. SayMobile
Posts: 156; Member since: Jan 29, 2014
the design is a total samsung rip off. looks almost like last years note 5 from d back.
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 3:26 AM 4
39. mafiaprinc3
Posts: 585; Member since: May 07, 2012
just remember the mi note and mi note pro had a similar design which came out a year before the note 5,so if you asked me samsung ripped off xiaomi
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 3:33 AM 6
60. keithtae
Posts: 564; Member since: Mar 25, 2015
That name, Mi 'Note' itself is a ripoff. These chinese companies just couldn't stop copying these bigger companies, which spent billions on R&D.
They are able to sell phones at a much cheaper price? Of course! They don't have to spend any bucks on R&D, all they gotta do is copy!
posted on Feb 24, 2016, 8:26 AM 1
35. TyrionLannister unregistered
Look guys, a lowlife noob who cares about Antutu scores.
