Web traffic research reveals the Microsoft Surface isn't selling very well

posted by Ray S. / Dec 11, 2012, 8:28 AM

Web traffic research reveals the Microsoft Surface isn't selling very well

Research firm Chitika has come up with a new report that shows just how insignificant the sales of the Microsoft Surface RT have been, at least judging by the web traffic generated by the device.

Chitika has measured that for the period between November 12 and November 18, the Microsoft Surface RT has accounted for just 0.13% of all web traffic generated by tablets in the US. Now, on one hand, that sure is one very discouraging figure, but on the other, the device hasn't really been available for too long. The combined share of Google's Nexus 7 and Nexus 10, which stands at 0.91%, is currently much bigger, but it's really not much more significant if we look at the bigger picture. In comparison, the iPad is said to be responsible for 88% of all tablet web traffic in the US.

Of course, having in mind the short period observed by Chitika makes us think that the research might not be entirely trustworthy, but it's a fact that there's still a long road ahead of Google, let alone Microsoft in the tablet race. Who knows, maybe people are waiting for the Surface Pro?

source: Chitika via AllThingsD

Related phones

View Full specs

PhoneArena Rating:

8.5

Read Full Review

Display 10.6" 1366 x 768 pixels

Camera 1 megapixel

Processor NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30, Quad-core, 1300 MHz

Storage 32 GB

FEATURED VIDEO

Options

39 Comments

1. Andman314

Posts: 61; Member since: Apr 27, 2011

Drop the price..... And it will sell.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:29 AM 15

9. MeoCao unregistered

Or it may already be selling well. I guess Surface owners prefer to play with the snappy kickstand to sufing the web. The "click" sound that the kickstand makes just feel too great LOL.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:44 AM 7

16. Andman314

Posts: 61; Member since: Apr 27, 2011

Lmfao!!!!!! That's very true. All Microsoft advertise in the commercial is the click sound.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 9:41 AM 2

39. Nadr1212

Posts: 741; Member since: Sep 22, 2012

I know I'd buy it if the price went down!

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 9:15 PM 0

29. InspectorGadget80 unregistered

And put WINDOWS 7 ON it to replace the crappy WINDOWS 8

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 12:41 PM 1

33. PhenomFaz

Posts: 1236; Member since: Sep 26, 2012

even the first nexus didnt sell like hot cakes...give ti time! Microsoft should trust and persevere with this awesome idea and in time this tablet will become a top notch brand

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 4:56 PM 2

35. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

I agree. The lower priced Android tablets are the ones selling. MS might have to take this apporach. Some Android tablet manufactures arent really making a profit, but they are getting their product in folks hands and making the money back elsewhere.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 6:58 PM 1

2. TROLL

Posts: 4851; Member since: Apr 13, 2012

ROTFLMFAO Really good news ™®©

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:31 AM 3

5. eisenbricher

Posts: 973; Member since: Aug 09, 2012

Seriously, why are you getting all tingly because of someone's failure? I'm not taking side of MS or anything but whole basis of your comments is Hate. Don't you care how silly you look to the people while posting such comments? Are you a kid?

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:35 AM 5

10. TROLL

Posts: 4851; Member since: Apr 13, 2012

I must hide it, lost in it's mind, and try not to offend those, whom are so much more smarter, and so very deep™®©

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:48 AM 3

21. squallz506

Posts: 1075; Member since: Oct 19, 2011

That brought a tear to my eye, troll.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 10:15 AM 4

36. papss unregistered

Strange that troll comes to a m$ topic just to post.. I think verge has a place for you on their worthless forum

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 7:35 PM 0

3. eisenbricher

Posts: 973; Member since: Aug 09, 2012

Surface Pro will sell better than this. Much better IF PRICED RIGHT. MS made a mistake pricing the RT version so steep.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:32 AM 13

4. TROLL

Posts: 4851; Member since: Apr 13, 2012

It will make no diffrent™®©

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:34 AM 3

6. eisenbricher

Posts: 973; Member since: Aug 09, 2012

Care to explain why?

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:36 AM 4

13. pongkie

Posts: 663; Member since: Aug 20, 2011

its 900+ bucks plus 5 hour battery life, the acer iconia w700 has 8hrs battery

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 9:14 AM 3

14. TROLL

Posts: 4851; Member since: Apr 13, 2012

LINUX VS UNIX lockdown vs freedom

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 9:14 AM 2

8. TylerGrunter

Posts: 1544; Member since: Feb 16, 2012

Surface Pro price is already known even if not official. And at $900 the cheaper option (64 GB) I doubt it has any real chance of success. Not to mention that the battery lasts less than 4 hours, which (IMO) it's a "no deal" for a tablet.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:43 AM 5

17. OHaZZaR

Posts: 131; Member since: Aug 19, 2011

That's very true. However, it is not meant to be a tablet exactly. Microsoft is selling it at a very competitive price for ultrabooks, especially since it's backed up by 4GB of RAM and Intel's 3rd Gen i5 processor. It is significantly more powerful than the most powerful tablet on the market. It is confusing however because of it's tablet form-factor. Microsoft's marketing isn't helping either. People will automatically see that the iPad or the Nexus 10 are significantly cheaper. They'll see that the Surface RT is cheaper also, so why don't they opt for that. Well if the Pro is priced at a premium, why would they want to settle for second best. They will quickly assume that microsoft prices it's products higher. For the average consumer, this is extremely confusing. Btw, 4 hours is great battery life, considering it's basically a laptop with a touchscreen and no keyboard.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 9:49 AM 4

19. TylerGrunter

Posts: 1544; Member since: Feb 16, 2012

Not to discuss most of what you said, but there are some holes there. Ultrabooks have quite limited sucess (21 millions in a year last time I checked) so if it competes on a market that has already low volumen, the doom is pretty much garanteed. The other issue that I see with the "tablet" is the form factor: a) Too heavy and bad battery for a tablet b) Not comfortable for an ultrabook (you can't use it in you lap while traveling as I'm doing with my laptop right now) So it may be just me, but I find it overpriced and with no real use case to sell in volume.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 10:04 AM 1

24. OHaZZaR

Posts: 131; Member since: Aug 19, 2011

Finally, someone that makes sense! Some users from phonearena and many users from cnet think it'll be a commercial hit because they think that it brings the best of the tablet and the best of the ultrabook and combine them. They fail to understand that this is more of an ultrabook with a touch-screen rather than a tablet with the power of an ultrabook. A tablet is a tablet because of it's portability, weight, and battery life. If you sacrifice in any one of these components, then you either have a bad tablet or the device ultimately fits in another category. The thing is with the surface, you can't really use it as an ultra book, especially with it's lack of a sturdy and inflexible keyboard (who thought their keyboard was a good idea?) and it has mediocre battery life for a tablet, so it brings the worst of both kinds. Since it's more ultrabook than tablet, this won't appeal to the mass-market. I expect it to be DOA

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 10:34 AM 1

28. TylerGrunter

Posts: 1544; Member since: Feb 16, 2012

Your comment made me smile. I actually was going to say "it brings the worst of both worlds instead of the best" in my previous comment.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 12:34 PM 1

20. phonegeek2

Posts: 12; Member since: Oct 22, 2012

You make a good point about the Surface tablet running windows RT vs the Pro running Windows 8. However, i thought the Pro would just be running 2 gigs of RAM. I am happy about this though, and do plan on buying a 128 gig Surface pro when they come out. I like the idea of the removable keyboard plus the ultrabook and portability of it.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 10:09 AM 2

22. squallz506

Posts: 1075; Member since: Oct 19, 2011

There will be better more affordable windows 8 tablet/transformer tabs made by other companies. Why do you prefer microsofts?

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 10:18 AM 1

25. OHaZZaR

Posts: 131; Member since: Aug 19, 2011

It would be a shame if it ran anything less than 4GB, especially since most laptops at that price have 4GB and even more at times. I do suggest that you wait to see some other options, especially when lenovo already introduced a better laptop, the lenovo thinkpad twist (check it out). Unless you really do prefer the keyboard to be removable. then you should opt for the Surface but I do believe that if I were a fan of windows 8, the Lenovo thinkpad twist is the laptop to get for now. Looks like Asus is going to release something better than both of those tablets so you probably should hold off and wait a couple of months or so.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 10:38 AM 0

7. lee480 unregistered

USA =/= World

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:38 AM 9

11. gazmatic

Posts: 807; Member since: Sep 06, 2012

it is too expensive.... Microsoft should not be competing with apple on price.... apple has drones and drones of fans ready, willing and able to camp out for days to shell out $600+ for a reiteration of an old device... Microsoft doesn't... this was very bad strategy... it should have been priced to compete with android... trust me... a surface for $300, only a die hard android fan would still buy a nexus 10... dumb dumb M$.... this is not how to sell devices...

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 8:55 AM 10

30. InspectorGadget80 unregistered

it's because Microsoft have a dumb marketing manager

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 12:45 PM 1

34. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

Sure you don't mean dumb CEO?

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 5:54 PM 1

12. ultimatebatman

Posts: 52; Member since: Dec 04, 2012

This is so misleading. iPad web traffic is calculated by viewing mobile sites, is it not? In that case, Android users can easily view desktop versions of their favorite sites, which contributes to these skewed numbers.

posted on Dec 11, 2012, 9:09 AM 4

view all comments