Verizon using small cells to bolster service in San Francisco

Verizon using small cells to bolster service in San Francisco
Verizon subscribers in San Francisco love consuming data. And that means that the carrier's cell towers in the city are as congested as a person suffering from a cold. That leads to sluggish performance (for the network we mean) and less than optimal connectivity for Big Red customers. So Verizon has installed small transmitters called "small cells" throughout the city, adding to the bandwidth available for its customers.

400 of these small cells are being affixed to light poles and power poles and each one will boost performance for Verizon users situated within 250 to 500 feet of them. That means you would have to be pretty close to the small cells to notice any difference on your phone. All 400 cells should be operational by the end of 2015, and those within range of them will find their data speeds could be up to three times faster.

Verizon employees do have a challenge when deploying these Ericsson-built small cells. They need to be perfectly spaced out or else the small cells interfere with each other. Besides having to make sure that the small cells don't cannibalize each other, the carrier also needs to make sure that their larger cell towers don't interfere.

While AT&T is also using small cell technology to improve its signal, Verizon is installing them in a much smaller area than AT&T, which creates a very dense network. The nation's largest carrier is using a heterogeneous network, known as HetNet, which allows Verizon to use multiple radio technologies over the same spectrum. Yes, this runs the risk of interference and cross-talk, but both Verizon and Ericsson are working hard to prevent this from happening.

Two different deployments of small cells on a light pole in San Francisco

Two different deployments of small cells on a light pole in San Francisco


source: GigaOm via PCMag

FEATURED VIDEO

8 Comments

1. bubbadoes

Posts: 1225; Member since: May 03, 2012

That's why they are the best!! Expensive or not, you pay for what you get!

2. Doakie

Posts: 2443; Member since: May 06, 2009

Meh... They suck still because they still use CDMA. CDMA is garbage. I hate the whole provisioning process and I hate not being able to use unlocked phones on their network. Screw Verizon. Also screw them for not doing roll over data.

3. torr310

Posts: 1602; Member since: Oct 27, 2011

Didi you read that the network is congested? I am suffering from the slow networking from VZW as well. I really love the old days that my speeds were around 30Mbs.

4. yellowdgg

Posts: 4; Member since: May 09, 2014

30Mbs? HAHHAHA I am getting 50 up to 70Mbs on tmobile.

6. HASHTAG unregistered

The majority of people are fine with even less than 30 Mbs..

7. bigdawg23

Posts: 467; Member since: May 25, 2011

Glad that works for you. T-Mobile has little to no coverage in many places I travel to in the Midwest.

5. ThekingPPR

Posts: 2; Member since: Nov 01, 2014

They may be the best network but the still can't send out the blackberry 10.3.1. Update as yet for this customer which is a worse part of their service

12. corporateJP

Posts: 2458; Member since: Nov 28, 2009

Verizon...ha...

Latest Stories