The T-Mobile/Sprint merger could be in trouble


The proposed merger between T-Mobile and Sprint has had a long and tumultuous road to travel and just one day before the CEOs of the two companies are set to answer questions from Congress, there's yet another roadblock getting put up. This time, it's a group of democratic senators who have signed a letter opposing the merger between the two companies.

The letter was sent by Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and eight colleagues, including Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Cory Booker (D-NJ), and Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.) and argues that the merger would create dangerous market concentration in the wireless space, likely causing subscription costs to go up for consumers, and this could be especially bad for low-income customers who make up the bulk of the prepaid contracts. The senators also argue that the merger would be bad for workers as an estimate from the Communications Workers of America claimed the deal would result in the loss of about 30,000 jobs.

The senators also noted that neither T-Mobile or Sprint have a track record for building out infrastructure in rural areas and the new merged company would have little reason to change that, meaning rural customers would still be bereft of choice for wireless service. And, possibly the most interesting argument made was in reference to the failed AT&T acquisition of T-Mobile from 2011, where exactly because that deal was stopped, T-Mobile was able to create an LTE network that arguably has better coverage than AT&T today.

Of course, these letters were sent to DOJ antitrust chief Makan Delrahim and FCC chairman Ajit Pai, neither of whom have a track record of being anti-consolidation or pro-consumer. Delrahim has been on record not being too worried about the monopolistic power held by companies like Apple, Facebook, or Google; and Pai notably ignored the large public outcry and protests in order to repeal Net Neutrality. So, it's a bit hard to imagine either one paying much attention to these letters.

FEATURED VIDEO

5 Comments

1. Rampage_Taco

Posts: 1079; Member since: Jan 17, 2017

Not to nitpick but Sanders is an Independent, not a Democrat

3. tuminatr

Posts: 1141; Member since: Feb 23, 2009

Yes, but he votes and caucuses with democrats. A good example is he ran as a democrat not and independent for president and Hillary beat him and got the nomination.

4. Rampage_Taco

Posts: 1079; Member since: Jan 17, 2017

he changed affiliation in '15 so he could use the Dems platform, then returned to Independent after the '16 general election

5. fakenewzz

Posts: 133; Member since: Nov 15, 2018

They are just grand standing and making it look like they give a sheet. Reality is the merger will go through. Big money y’all!

6. DarthJarJar

Posts: 62; Member since: Feb 01, 2018

I wonder what happens when the people who decided not to build out a network now work for Tmobile. You’re literally turning one sinking ship into two. Sprint doesn’t have a network... do you think T-Mobile’s can handle twice the amount of people? If it goes through I’m going back to Verizon. I get a discount through them and I’d rather pay money for something that works.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.