Specs revealed for MediaTek's 10-core MT6797 Helio X20 chip
posted by Alan F. / Apr 21, 2015, 12:29 AM
The MT6797 will reportedly offer a 40% boost in performance when compared to the prior Helio X10 chips put out by MediaTek. That includes the MT6795 which is found inside the recently unveiled HTC One M9 Plus.
The MT6797 will employ MediaTek's Tri-Cluster CPU Architecture. The 4+4 A53 cores will use the big.LITTLE architecture to provide a balance of power and efficient battery use. The chip will be produced using TSMC's 20nm process and does support LTE-A/Cat. 6. The latter provides data speed as fast as 300Mbps.
Mass production of the MT6797 is expected to begin in July, which means it could be the end of the year before manufacturers start using the chip inside new smartphones. The big question is whether MediaTek can break into the U.S. market and provide a real challenge to Qualcomm.
source: Weibo via GizmoChina
Posts: 2486; Member since: Jan 26, 2014
I don't really get why it's big.LITTLE.littler...
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 12:35 AM 6
Posts: 1280; Member since: Feb 27, 2014
Same here the terminology they're using is so confusing. Mediatek is just focusing on number of cores yet in functionality they're behind. Hopefully snapdragon stopped at 8 cores and focus on improving heat problems, battery saving features and more useful innovations.
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 1:10 AM 5
Posts: 5552; Member since: Feb 10, 2013
I can kind of understand big.LITTLE 4+4 or 2+4 The big cores for short high performance Small cores for stand by and low performance needs But I don't understand 2+4+4 or 2+8 I don't see why they'd want 8 A53 cores And I don't see why they'd cap some at 2Ghz and some at 1.5Ghz IMO they may as well not have included the 1.5Ghz A53s since the 2.0Ghz A53s can down clock to 1.5Ghz or lower They should have used that die space for 2 more A72s or more GPU
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 1:14 AM 3
Posts: 847; Member since: Oct 15, 2014
Main purpose of 10 core seems like marketing and getting high scores from certain benchmarks like Antutu and Geekbench multicore (again for marketing.) Right, it's kind of wasting die area, but I suppose not (almost) entirely useless like the company's true octacore chips' extra cores. If Snapdragon 615 and Kirin 930 could save some power with their big.LITTLE-ish configuration this one could do same.
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 1:41 PM 0
Posts: 232; Member since: Apr 13, 2015
10 cores ridiculous man why cant they (qualcomm,mediatek& exynos) stop bragging about cores and clockspeed and start concentrating on performance like intel and apple i hate apple for their bloody marketting,their cruel oswith no freedom to customers and ignorance to thier customers wishes but kudos to thier soc and camera
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 12:55 AM 4
Posts: 1150; Member since: Feb 25, 2012
The end product of a processor is how fast it runs an OS and performs simple task. I like Apple I even use a 6 plus but to say their processor is above the competition means you are lacking in research and information. Let's put it this way, even if the A8 in the iPhone 6 is faster than the exynos in the note 4. The note 4 is still a much faster device overal than the iPhone. Countless of videos are out there for you to judge. As for the new exynos in the s6 I wouldn't even go there.
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 1:34 AM 3
And it will be accompanied with a 2013 GPU which will make for a disappointing chip overall. Also, the big.LITTLE already causes clashes due to different instruction sets, this will increase the problem. And can't you downclock the 2 GHz A53 to 1.4 GHz? What's the need of that 3rd cluster. A 2 cortex A72 + 4 A53 would have been a better choice.
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 1:02 AM 9
Posts: 517; Member since: Apr 06, 2015
Mediatek loves Antutu, and Antutu loves CPU. Blinding the average user with big numbers.
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 2:06 AM 9
Posts: 353; Member since: Sep 25, 2012
Cortex A72 provides its BEST PERFORMANCE upgrade on 14/16nm process .. while Mediatek is using 20nm .. I think that's not going to give them the said performance upgrade compared to Cortex A57 .. I want these companies to NOT to play gimmicks and waste time .. Rather let's just concentrate on battery savings features, per core performance, extremely faster switching between multiple cores, extremely faster turning on/off of cores, built-in support for new tech (like Camera enhancements, SONAR fingerprint scanners, KNOX like built-in OS profile separation etc.), use new materials instead of silicon etc.
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 1:50 AM 2
Posts: 30; Member since: Jan 31, 2015
this thing on 20 nm probably would cause massive overheat !
posted on Apr 21, 2015, 2:16 AM 3
Posts: 103; Member since: Aug 09, 2014
The chip process itself in AnTuTu, now we just need to see if it proves itself in real-world years, and if the power efficiency gains are tangible. I think the biggest downfall of separate clusters is switching from one cluster to another too slow. I'd like to see like a single core for idle and other low power level stuff, then perhaps a quad core mid, and dual or quad high. What has always confused me is why do slow quad and fast dual? I don't quite understand that.
posted on Aug 24, 2015, 7:15 PM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):