New Samsung Galaxy S6 Active renders show the phone's camouflage versions

New Samsung Galaxy S6 Active renders show the phone's camouflage versions
While Samsung has yet to confirm the existence of the Galaxy S6 Active, the handset is likely going to be announced soon. Just yesterday, we showed you a couple of live photos that presented the S6 Active, and now we can also take a look at two renders that show the smartphone's front and rear sides.

According to @evleaks, what we have here is indeed the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active - a version that's specifically made for AT&T. Just like the Galaxy S5 Active from 2014, the S6 Active has three hardware buttons on the front, and doesn't feature a fingerprint scanner.

The S6 Active will probably share many of its specs with the regular Galaxy S6, including a 64-bit octa-core Exynos 7420 processor, a 5.1-inch Quad HD display, and 3 GB of RAM. However, the upcoming handset will be rugged and water-resistant, while also having a larger battery: 3600 mAh. A microSD card slot might also be included.

It looks like the Galaxy S6 Active will have at least three color versions: black (the one seen yesterday in live photos), camouflage blue, and camouflage white (you can see the last two below). Which one would you get, and how much would you be willing to pay for it?


source: @evleaks

Related phones

Galaxy S6 Active
  • Display 5.1" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 16 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa, Octa-core, 2100 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB
  • Battery 3500 mAh

FEATURED VIDEO

27 Comments

1. tedkord

Posts: 16976; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

Where are the pictures of the camouflage ones?

9. QWERTYslider unregistered

What US carriers will get versions? No removable battery & and SD = NO SALE. Since no fingerprint scanner, this better be free with contract or $200 cheaper than the S6.

14. tedkord

Posts: 16976; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

Jesus Christ, you're making me want to buy an S6 for everyone in my family just to help make sure they never put microsd or removable battery back in, just to spite you.

17. joeytaylor

Posts: 955; Member since: Feb 28, 2015

Too funny Tedkord....some people cannot be pleased

19. vergil9

Posts: 517; Member since: Apr 06, 2015

You think your opinion applies to everyone?

20. gaming64 unregistered

There it goes again with your B.S.

18. waddup121 unregistered

nice!

2. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

If it has a 3600mAh battery I'm buying.

3. hboy857

Posts: 367; Member since: Jun 03, 2013

This phone looks like 'meh'.

6. alaw.14

Posts: 407; Member since: Sep 10, 2013

Since when does rugged phones were designed to look good. They are supposed to look mean and aggressive to make it seem like they can take some heavy damage. To me it looks good for a rugged phone.

12. marorun

Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015

Its not rugged if its like the S5 active.. way to easy to break and not a real rugged phone.

15. tedkord

Posts: 16976; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

The regular S5 was able to survive being run over by an SUV. The Active was tougher.

22. bur60

Posts: 981; Member since: Jul 07, 2014

getting run over doesnt put much pressure on the phone. If you get a car run over your leg, you have chance to not break your leg, because most of the force is forward, only a little is going downward. If the car stopped on top of the phone, it would become as flat as a coin.

27. tedkord

Posts: 16976; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

Then I expect you'll have no trouble running over whatever phone you own and posting the video. I look forward to seeing it.

25. andynaija

Posts: 1230; Member since: Sep 08, 2012

*Since when were rugged phones designed to look good?* Here you go.

4. xxCearxx

Posts: 26; Member since: Apr 11, 2014

If the regular s6 with a 2550 mah. Battery is good in endurance, imagine this with. 3600!!!!

8. Ordinary

Posts: 2454; Member since: Apr 23, 2015

50% more endurance so thats around 12-13 hours damn

7. rotkiv3451

Posts: 85; Member since: Jan 07, 2015

YESSSS!!!!!! I'm so happy right now (as long as this ships internationally)!!!!!! That's all I wanted, great screen, great camera and great battery!!!! Thank you Samsung! Just remember to bring this phone to Brazil!

26. Jason2k13

Posts: 1435; Member since: Mar 28, 2013

Brazil? it might cost you over $1000

10. marorun

Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015

I Had load of client thats got broken S5 active screen that where broken after a small drop. Its not really solid like they say it is. Want a real rugged android device? you got to sacrifice a bit but a Sonim XP7700 is a real choice as its one of the few fully covered by a 3 year warranty thats include physical or liquid damage.

11. Neros

Posts: 1016; Member since: Dec 19, 2014

Looks good for a rugged phone. Definitely a good purchase for those who value a good battery and resistance.

13. jessyi

Posts: 325; Member since: Jan 08, 2015

Ugly.

16. Taters

Posts: 6474; Member since: Jan 28, 2013

It looked pretty bad in the other picture with no camouflage. This makes it look a lot better. Amazing what a pattern can do. Oh well, as long as I am aware my mind is playing tricks on me unlike the isheep that genuinely think that Apple isn't raping them hard.

21. gaming64 unregistered

Looks better than the steel door version

23. bugsbunny00

Posts: 2251; Member since: Jun 07, 2013

looks as same as all galaxy actives..meh

24. AlikMalix unregistered

Looks dirty more than camo'ed

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Latest Stories