Motorola ATRIX HD benchmark tests
posted by John V. / Jul 12, 2012, 4:31 PM
Out of the box, there’s no arguing the speedy and instantaneous nature of the device’s performance. Exhibiting a near effortless performance with various operations, we love the fluidity and responsiveness we’re seeing with the smartphone. Even better, it maintains its high rate of performance with other processor intensive tasks – such as navigating through the homescreen with a live wallpaper. In fact, in our short time of checking out the ATRIX HD, it didn’t yield any instances of slowdown or lag. Therefore, we’re taking a liking to its real-world performance, which some people value more than anything else.
However, as soon as we started running the usual round of benchmarking tests with the handset, we find that the results aren’t that compelling. Well, it still manages to put up some respectable scores, but nothing that’s regarded groundbreaking. So with that, here are the results from our testing.
Posts: 685; Member since: Nov 23, 2010
Did not expect those numbers... seems weak.
posted on Jul 12, 2012, 4:52 PM 0
Posts: 2137; Member since: Oct 18, 2011
weak? How exactly?
posted on Jul 12, 2012, 5:28 PM 1
Posts: 311; Member since: May 03, 2012
Like the article said, Its not ground breaking but it is where it should be... Once again you will not find a better phone than this for the price range people...stop being geeks and get real, this phone will perform really good in your day to day usage...
posted on Jul 13, 2012, 4:50 PM 1
Posts: 1732; Member since: Feb 10, 2009
For everyone complaining about this phone it says in the artical it's a mid range phone. Just like the droid incredable the atrix name is not a high end phone any more. Ok maybe it's a high end phone for a year ago but that's how the smartphone thing works
posted on Jul 13, 2012, 4:42 AM 0
Posts: 411; Member since: Jun 30, 2012
Would have been great to post what exact type of processor the phone has...Article writing 101 guys come on....
posted on Jul 12, 2012, 5:05 PM 7
Posts: 96; Member since: Mar 07, 2012
It has a 1.5 GHz Dual Core Qualcomm Snapdragon processorhttp://www.motorola.com/us/con
sumers/MOTOROLA-ATRIX%E2%84%A2-HD/MB886-ATRIX-HD,en_US,pd.html?selectedTab=t all the way at the bottom under technology ab-2&cgid=mobile-phones
posted on Jul 12, 2012, 6:10 PM 1
Posts: 820; Member since: Oct 19, 2011
link's broken... use a shortener, it doesn't like that comma in there. But it is somewhat sad that the phone did not preform very well. Hope they make a better version of it on VZW, just like they did with the Atrix -> Razr. And I'm also not a fan of those on-screen Android buttons.
posted on Jul 12, 2012, 7:56 PM 0
Posts: 203; Member since: Dec 01, 2011
i totally agree, screw the quad core processors and benchmarks, no need for that...give me a damn battery that last two days..i am so sick of charging these lte battery sucking phones that need charging twice a day just for one hour of searching emails...charge 3 hourse for one hour of real use...how pathetic!!!
posted on Jul 12, 2012, 6:08 PM 4
very disappointing. I'm still buying the iOn could care less if it's last years processor
posted on Jul 12, 2012, 7:02 PM 0
Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011
yeaaaah, that's dumb.
posted on Jul 13, 2012, 12:08 AM 0
Posts: 1; Member since: Dec 17, 2012
I ran the bench multiple times and the highest i got was 4970, and the lowest i got was 4840. The guy who did this was clearly an idiot. CLEAR THE APPS BEFORE YOU RUN THE BENCH.
posted on Dec 17, 2012, 1:23 PM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):