Google+ Sign-In tries to beat Facebook Connect by avoiding "social spam"

Google+ Sign-In tries to beat Facebook Connect by avoiding
Single sign-in options have been around for a while, but more and more they are being tied to our social networks, meaning instead of just a unified sign-in process, you also have to take into account personal data and sharing. Facebook Connect has been pushing those bounds for a while, but now Google wants to really take on Facebook with Google+ Sign-In which promises to kill "social spam".

The idea is pretty simple: rather than having to create accounts for all of the new apps and websites that you come across, you can use your existing Google account to sign in. Google promises that G+ Sign-In will have all of the security you would expect from Google, including options for 2-step verification. And, most importantly, much like when installing an Android app, there will be a permissions screen that outlines what information is shared with the app and who will be able to see your activity within the app.

Google+ Sign-In will be available on both Android and iOS, but obviously Google is giving a little extra to Android users in the deal. The cool bonus for Android is that if you use G+ Sign-In on a website, you can have the mobile app version of the site automatically installed on your Android device (assuming the site has an app of course). 


But, the part that we're all interested in is how G+ Sign-In will work with social. Facebook Connect was famous for introducing "frictionless sharing", which ultimately became a flood of information that no one wants to wade through, and something that Facebook had to tone down. Google is taking a different approach. Google's idea is to still have the option for "interactive sharing" (things you choose to share), but the "frictionless" data (things passively sent by the app, like music listening habits) will not surface until it is relevant. So, instead of having the constant stream of passively shared data, that information will only come up contextually, like when your friends search for a certain band. The "interactive sharing" will also work the other way around where your friends can click something you've shared and be pushed directly into the original app to view the content. 

This type of sharing makes for a very powerful system for content creators, who can now have much more control over how and where users see the content. This type of deep integration into apps could easily give content creators more control, and more importantly make in-app ads or in-app purchases to access content more valuable. 

Combine that with the fact that many people already have a Google account of some form or another (Gmail, YouTube, etc) and this could be an attractive option. Google may not have as many users as Facebook, but this should still be a competitive option. Not to mention, this will help to generate quite a bit more activity and information for Google+. 

And, Google has pulled together a pretty impressive list of apps that will be launching Google+ Sign-In, including: Shazam, Fitbit, The Guardian, USA Today, OpenTable, Flixter, TuneIn, Fancy, and more. 


FEATURED VIDEO

9 Comments

1. PointMaza

Posts: 60; Member since: Dec 14, 2012

Google+ is pretty awesome facebook is a s**t

2. protozeloz

Posts: 5396; Member since: Sep 16, 2010

this is nice, for a change

3. Venuramax

Posts: 17; Member since: Nov 10, 2011

Google + is a crap

7. commentator_prime

Posts: 2; Member since: Feb 27, 2013

Google+* there is no space in between.

9. MichaelHeller

Posts: 2734; Member since: May 26, 2011

Would you mind at least explaining why you think Google+ is "crap"?

4. Socahan

Posts: 9; Member since: Oct 17, 2012

The road to hell is always paved with "good" intentions. REMEMBER THIS!!

5. NateAdam8

Posts: 411; Member since: Feb 17, 2012

If Google so "Good" then why don't they release Apps for Windows Phone 8 and Windows 8 or making Apps like YouTube and Google+ to hard for them?

6. commentator_prime

Posts: 2; Member since: Feb 27, 2013

Being "good" does not mean you should do it for free or for a small profit. Let Microsoft get a team together to figure this out. Why would Google make their IP stuffs work for the 4 Windows Phone users out there. Would you spend your time trying to make things easier for your competitors ?

8. MichaelHeller

Posts: 2734; Member since: May 26, 2011

Google is updating Chrome for Windows 8 UI, and since all Google services are web based, they see that as good enough. And, until Windows Phone 8 gets enough users to make a dent in the mobile market, Google doesn't want to spend the resources on the platform. Simple as that. It's like asking why Microsoft doesn't make apps for bada.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.