x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Feds change defense in order to conceal details about its ‘stingray’ device

Feds change defense in order to conceal details about its ‘stingray’ device

Posted: , by Charlene S.

Feds change defense in order to conceal details about its ‘stingray’ device
In 2008, self-describer hacker Daniel David Rigmaiden was arrested and charged with identity theft, unauthorized computer access, mail fraud and wire fraud for stealing more than $4 million through false tax filings.

For the last year, Rigmaiden has claimed that his arrest was a result of a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, which protects citizen from unreasonable search and seizure, because the government used a device called the stingray to track his cell phone without a valid warrant. The U.S. Department of Justice has stood by the defense that the use of the stingray is not considered a search because the user did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy while use Verizon Wireless cellphone service.

Feds change defense in order to conceal details about its ‘stingray’ device
Rigmaiden has requested additional information about the stingray in order to further examine what information was gathered about him and possible innocent bystanders within range of the device. What is known about the stingray thus far is, it mimics a cell tower to measure the signal strength of a target mobile device. The stingray is moved to other locations, and the resulting data is used to triangulate the position of the target. The scope of data it collects is unknown, particularly because investigators delete the tracking data, rather than submitting it to the court.

In the latest development of this case, the government is now admitting that the use of the stingray in this case could be considered a search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. They are willing to make concessions specifically for this case in order to “avoid unnecessary disclosures” about the device. The judge in the case, David G. Campbell, has expressed the potential need for more information about the stingray before being able to determine whether or not its use can be considered a search in this case.

The FBI stated in a recent memo, it deletes all data from the stingrays because it tends to gather data on other mobile devices in addition to the suspect's. The FBI has stated that their intent is to ensure “the privacy rights of those innocent third parties are maintained.

source: The Wall Street Journal

  • Options

posted on 08 Nov 2011, 21:53 1

1. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

Big brother is watching you....

posted on 08 Nov 2011, 21:57 4

2. androidphan (Posts: 32; Member since: 06 Nov 2011)

Either way the guy is a crook. Hang em high.... Stingray or not this guy should go to jail.

posted on 08 Nov 2011, 22:33 4

4. beatsandmelody (Posts: 109; Member since: 01 Nov 2011)

Maybe... In America, you are (supposed to be) innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Authorities breaking the law to prosecute law breakers... It's a pretty unsettling idea.

Who would police the police? The federal government? At this point in time, it seems they are in the pockets of major corporations.

posted on 08 Nov 2011, 22:08 3

3. denney (Posts: 98; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)

That device in no way resembles a beautiful 4-band electric bass. I am disappoint.

posted on 09 Nov 2011, 00:07 1

5. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)

Sure, the government gets all pissy and will scrutinize companies like Google for using location data to deliver more specific ads, but it's quite all right for them to use this super Big Brother device.

posted on 09 Nov 2011, 01:15 1

6. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

That thing is ugly. Steve Jobs would have made a much more elegant design.

posted on 09 Nov 2011, 08:41 1

7. iHateCrapple (Posts: 734; Member since: 12 Feb 2010)

You fruitcake, lol

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories