Feature phones aren't dead yet: Samsung REX series is announced
posted by Nick T. / Feb 14, 2013, 5:41 AM
Nope, feature phones haven't gone extinct yet, although their market share is surely dwindling. Samsung just announced a whole new lineup of feature phones tailored for the needs of emerging markets. The Samsung REX series, as it is called, consists of four handsets priced from Rs. 4,280 up to Rs. 6,490 ($80 to $120).
The Samsung REX 90 is the leader of the gang with its 3.5-inch touchscreen with resolution of 320 by 480 pixels. It also offers a 3.2MP camera, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and a 1,000mAh battery that should provide 15 hours of talk time. Next up we have the Samsung REX 80, which has a smaller, 3-inch touchscreen display with resolution of 240 by 320 pixels. There's a 3MP camera on its back and features like Wi-Fi and Bluetooth are supported. Its battery also has a capacity of 1,000mAh.
The Samsung REX 70 comes pretty close to the REX 80 in terms of features, but sports a camera of only 2MP and has no Wi-Fi support. And the Samsung REX 60 is the least capable phone among the four with its 2.8-inch resistive touchscreen and 1.3MP camera.
All Samsung REX phones come with the company's TouchWiz UI, home screen widgets, access to social networks, EDGE cellular connectivity, microSD card slots for storage expansion, and basic internet access via Opera Mini. Moreover, 10 free games come pre-loaded on them, courtesy of Gameloft. All models will come in both single- and dual-SIM variants.
The Samsung REX feature phones are bound to hit the shelves in India soon. At this time, we have no information whether any of them will be available in other markets.
Posts: 453; Member since: Jun 29, 2012
Talk about milking the galaxy design cow :-\
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 5:55 AM 13
Posts: 31; Member since: Feb 07, 2013
only for when needed for accident , but the specs suck
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 5:57 AM 2
Even if you are looking for smarty-phone prowess, why bother blasting a feature phone for not being a smart phone? Plenty of folks cannot afford the smartphone, or its associated data plans, and would prefer something that just works the basics well enough to... you know... work. If it has a decent 2 Mpix camera (adding a LED flash might be a nice touch) and a music player, in addition to just being a great phone for voice calls and maybe texting, that might do it for many folks. You know, they tried to dumb the Cingular/AT&T Nokia N75 down to be more like a feature phone, so why not make a phone with a decent small touch screen, nearly the specs of the N75 in terms of camera, video, music, and connectivity, and maybe add Samsung's TouchWiz, and... WHAM! Killer feature phone! Can't compete with any modern smartphone, but it isn't even trying to, so who cares? If it works, and it's cheap, then it works for cheap! I could go with a REX 70 and get a lot of use out of it... as long as the photos come out as good as the N75's 2-Mpix shots do, though I'm not sure its all that likely without the flash and nicer optics... but who knows?
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 8:27 PM 0
Well, okay... so I would need it to have dual-band US 3G on 850 and 1900 MHz to get the service that my N75 gets, and that's not likely to come down the pipe if this is going to emerging markets only. Yeah, okay, so it might not work after all. But if they made one for US the market, then it would be interesting to me.
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 8:44 PM 0
Posts: 1442; Member since: Nov 19, 2012
You can get an Android entry level smartphones for the same price of the REX90 and an older android phone (like phones from 2011 approaching their end of life) for the same price of the REX80 and still have better hardware.
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 6:13 AM 4
Posts: 131; Member since: Oct 23, 2012
Can I install skype and viber on that?
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 6:50 AM 0
Posts: 254; Member since: Sep 06, 2011
I really don't understand why would people who don't want smartphones want a pseudo-smartphone. You can get a similarly priced Android for that price. Those that don't want smartphones usually want high durability/ruggedness, long battery life, t9 keyboards and simplicity of use. These pseudo-smartphones offer none of those, yet are not good enough to compete with actual smartphones.
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 9:01 AM 0
Posts: 318; Member since: Apr 02, 2011
A large touchscreen, dual sim, most models with 3G, Touchwiz and APPS! Surely more than a match for Nokia Asha series. :)
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 8:03 PM 0
Samsung REX = Nokia Asha SLAYERS! Samsung will dominate the last of the feature phone space in the same way that Nokia dominated it, when feature phones were at their height, for the last two decades. Feature phones are not dead yet, but they are dying, and Samsung may yet squeeze everything that is left out of that sector before either Android or Windows Phone become so inexpensive that Java-based and BREW MP feature phones can no longer compete with decent affordable low-end smartphones.
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 8:19 PM 0
Posts: 494; Member since: Sep 21, 2012
The ignored portion of the market lately has been touch-only feature phones. For a while there, LG and Samsung flooded the market (remember the Highlight, Dares and NVTouch handsets?). The touch technology was balky and there was a high failure rate within 2 years. Still, I get a steady stream of people looking for the same style phone because they don't want a smartphone and feel like a flip phone is too primitive.
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 12:22 PM 0
Posts: 3165; Member since: Jun 19, 2010
You know, I bet a lot of people would be satisfied with feature phones if they were just not so bad. Smartphones are great and a large part of the reason for the migration to them is how great they are, but the monthly costs are also quite crazy with them. And some features like Wi-fi for whatever reason are not available on 99% of Feature phones. Or they have terrible cameras. A lot of smartphone users only use their phones for the smae things they did with their feature phones, Im sure they would be fine with just having a GOOD feature phone.
posted on Feb 14, 2013, 1:49 PM 1
Posts: 1256; Member since: Nov 12, 2012
lol... ASHA by nokia is WAYYYY better!!!
posted on Feb 15, 2013, 12:00 AM 0
Posts: 318; Member since: Apr 02, 2011
Nokia Asha and Nokia Lumia are damaged goods as far as image is concerned ever since the marketing fiascos that were recently exposed, not to mention the other marketing blunders long time ago. Welcome to 2013, 14 years of Nokia domination ended by their own board of directors, shareholders and most especially their CEO who for two long years struggled with the Windows Phone Lumiacy.
posted on Feb 15, 2013, 6:52 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):