Apple rests its case in second patent trial; Samsung starts calling its witnesses
posted by Alan F. / Apr 11, 2014, 9:56 PM
Lockheimer testified that at the beginning, the Android team consisted of 20 to 30 people, a number that more than doubled by the time the T-Mobile G1 was launched. Today, the executive has 600 employees working under him. But the Android executive wasn't on the stand to discuss that. Under oath, he said that some of the features that Apple is suing Samsung over, were already on the Android OS, used on some devices like the Samsung GALAXY Nexus. Certain features, outside of the "slide-to-unlock" tool, were already invented by Google, according to Lockheimer, before Apple patented them. This is why Samsung says that Apple's suit is an "attack on Android." Apple believes that Samsung copied Apple's designs, illegally used its patents, and then priced its phones and tablets below iPhone and iPad prices.
Future witnesses expected to be called by Samsung include executives Dianne Hackborn and Cary Clark. Both are going to tell the jury all about the design, and development of the Android OS. If you're wondering why Apple doesn't sue Google directly, it is because Google does not make the hardware. Still, if Apple wins this trial, it is believed that Google will make some changes to Android
The trial resumes on Monday and testimony from 17 witnesses is expected to be heard, mostly by reading through depositions and putting them on the record. There is a chance that Judge Lucy Koh will ask Samsung to cut down that number. The Cupertino based tech titan is seeking $2.19 billion from Samsung, and a sales ban on the infringing products. Samsung is seeking $7 million from its cross-complaint.
source: CNET, AppleInsider
Posts: 154; Member since: Mar 24, 2014
apple is suing samsung again and again..!
posted on Apr 11, 2014, 10:28 PM 4
Posts: 3269; Member since: Nov 15, 2013
majority of apple's patent are inventions of others... USPto is a blind body, which favors apple in granting patents.... may be apple is a big tax payer and government dont want to loose their revenue so they blindly grant patent to apple OR 2nd reason can be that government & uspto hiddenly take money from apple... see how obama safe guard apple, it shows even obama might have taken money under the table or may be his election campaign was sponsored by apple and he owe alot to apple
posted on Apr 12, 2014, 12:40 AM 5
Posts: 4062; Member since: Jul 23, 2013
It isn't about tax payers or whatever. The US intends to have economic domination in the richer western nations through its patent system (since it can't just invade them). That is why they have made all these trade agreements under the table with so many western and developed nations to agree to accept US patents without question. The US companies are given patents more easily than foreign companies and as you can see, even the executive branch bows down to patents from their companies. It is just to have a hand in every cookie jar because that insures no matter what, the US makes money even if someone outside the US makes money.
posted on Apr 12, 2014, 5:43 AM 1
Posts: 1612; Member since: Jan 16, 2012
"If you're wondering why Apple doesn't sue Google directly, it is because Google does not make the hardware." Didn't stop Oracle. "Still, if Apple wins this trial, it is believed that Google will make some changes to Android." Google already talks regularly with Apple to not step on their toes. But they aren't exactly forthcoming with it. "Another sign of fatigue is the frequency with which executives and lawyers from Apple and Google speak to one another about patent disputes. Earlier this year, Google proposed a cease-fire, according to people familiar with the conversations. And when Google withdrew its Motorola suit last week, it was widely seen as a peace gesture. But Apple has been hard to pin down, said one person from Google who was not authorized to speak publicly. “Sometimes they’re asking for money. Then they say we have to promise to not copy aspects of the iPhone. And whenever we get close to an agreement, it all changes again. “Our feeling is they don’t really want this to end. As long as everyone is distracted by these trials, the iPhone continues to sell.” Apple declined to comment on the negotiations." Read about it here: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10
posted on Apr 11, 2014, 10:32 PM 2
Posts: 455; Member since: Feb 21, 2013
This is very Apple. Someone has patents for technologies that they don't have. They wait for it to be invented somewhere in the garadge, when the technology comes to light, they threaten the inventor that they have no right to use that technology: sell it to us instead. I think if a patent is given, there should be a time limit after which if there is no invention of the same, the patent becomes null and void open for anyone else to claim it.
posted on Apr 12, 2014, 2:10 AM 3
Posts: 4146; Member since: Nov 02, 2012
I sure wish Apple would target Google in court and let the chips fall where they may. If they lose, apple that is, the court should spank an soak them for wasting time, resources and making the judicial system look like a total sham entertaining apples whims.
posted on Apr 12, 2014, 12:47 AM 1
Posts: 455; Member since: Feb 21, 2013
"...that Apple is suing Samsung over, were already on the Android OS, used on some devices like the Samsung GALAXY Nexus. Certain features, outside of the "slide-to-unlock" tool, were already invented by Google, according to Lockheimer, before Apple patented them..." Apple patents other peoples's ideas, wait for them to be invented the sue the inventor.
posted on Apr 12, 2014, 2:03 AM 2
Posts: 14; Member since: Apr 08, 2014
I believe that some contributors to this site may have a misunderstanding. Patents issued by the patent office do not declare that the issued patent is original. the patent issue is to ensure that the claims are written in such a way that a trial has the best chance of resolving ownership. The burden on originality, before patent issue, is not all that great. In fact it can never be thorough as many companies chose to hide ways that they do things (proprietary protection) as opposed to revealing what they do. when a trial occurs, the burden is on the company which did not reveal what they did but that can be a small price for keeping a feature quiet. regarding the swiping issue the patentability of swiping should not be cell phone dependent. theoretically different use is not patentable and if swiping is used elsewhere for information selection, then swiping is owned by that party or no one if there is no claim. however, i have noticed that the courts have not appreciated that component of the law; Ge was prevented from making an analog control system for their steam turbines because Westinghouse won the court battle. In fact, analog control systems have been around for a long long time before Westinghouse built steam turbines and hence Westinghouse should never have been allowed to prevent GE from using analog control systems for steam turbine control. hey.... that is the legal system. not perfect, but at least something is in place to at least attempt to resolve differences. Patents tend to have short term effect and tend to encourage unique solutions that often displace the patent defending a given solution. I imagine that is happening now. Visual displays and interaction with them is archaic. patent fighting will spur a technology that eliminates the displays as we know them and the corresponding input approaches.
posted on Apr 12, 2014, 3:39 PM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):