Oracle considering purchase of webOS as further ammunition against Android
Oracle doesn’t seem to have any strategic interest in creating their own mobile platform. Instead, the move would most likely be used to provide Oracle with more leverage in its ongoing legal battles with Google over Android.
The sources said HP expected to sell off the division for much less than the $1.2 billion they paid for it in 2010. Given the exorbitant prices that patents have been fetching of late, it would seem that a bidding war could not be ruled out.
HP acquired several important smartphone patents when it purchased Palm, and it’s likely that the IP could use asserted against a broad range of mobile devices. It’s hard to say how many additional targets Oracle might have in mind, or even if they will ultimately end up purchasing webOS, but one thing seems clear: we will be seeing more lawsuits in the mobile ecosystem in the future.
source: Reuters via intomobile
1. gallitoking posted on 08 Nov 2011, 13:02 4 6
I think i will become a lawyer... I see a bright future there... $$$$
5. remixfa posted on 08 Nov 2011, 13:14 1 0
i always wondered exactly how much these patent laywers get paid.. i wonder just how big their yacht is... and can it hold their Ferraris so they can take it all to a foreign port.
10. Droid_X_Doug posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:06 2 0
The going rate in the S.F. Bay Area starts at around $500/hour for experienced associates and goes to north of $750/hour for partners. The average cost to take a case to trial (through trial verdict but not any appeal work) is around $2.0 million depending on how aggressive you want to get prosecuting the patent infringement.
19. remixfa posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:29 1 0
are you serious??? i might just change my degree again.. lol
26. Droid_X_Doug posted on 08 Nov 2011, 15:28 1 0
The $ numbers are what I am paying for a A-level national firm to process current applications that I have pending with the U.S. PTO. The $2.0 million number was what was quoted to me as a ballpark budget number when the initial verdict in i4i v. Microsoft was announced. BTW, the $2.0 million number is just the legal fees. There are costs and expenses to add in as well.
36. corporateJP posted on 09 Nov 2011, 10:40 1 1
Considering you're already an a$$hole, you're pretty well qualified.
2. taco50 (banned) posted on 08 Nov 2011, 13:04 4 15
Hoping Oracle gets some big money from these thieves
4. remixfa posted on 08 Nov 2011, 13:13 7 1
considering how often apple gets busted for stealing code, you dont have a leg to stand on.
put 2 and 2 together.. if Oracle's position is to become a patent troll and milk OS's for some money with palm's long held patents, its only a matter of time before they go after iOS.
Watch what you wish for, you just might get it.
12. Droid_X_Doug posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:13 2 0
The scuttlebutt on Oracle's case v. Google over Android infringing the Sun Java patents is that Larry is wanting $1+ Billion.... Got to cover the acquisition costs (of Sun) somehow.
13. maxican16 posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:13 5 0
Your comments are a joke. Thanks for the laughs!
3. remixfa posted on 08 Nov 2011, 13:11 7 1
oracle has turned into a patent troll.. go figure.
9. The_Miz posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:06 3 8
Maybe because Android violates some of their parents?
21. remixfa posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:30 7 1
miz, if they were violating ORACLE patents, they wouldnt be trying to buy WEBOS to try to have patents to SUE with. They are buying other patents to try to find ammo, because they have none with their own patents.
33. Gemmol posted on 09 Nov 2011, 05:11 0 0
your wrong, they are winning the court case already this is just for major damage, did you not read the articles with oracle and android talks
34. remixfa posted on 09 Nov 2011, 07:13 0 0
they arent winning.. its either win or lose. Its a catch 22 case.
When android first started using the oracle code (java was free to use at the time), they were allowed to by its previous CEO with his blessing. When the company changed leadership, they closed the open java code and tried to sell it. Since google had already been using it for free, they started demanding royalties. Google has already offered out of court settlements, but oracle wants more. They smell the blood money and they want it.
This was just paraphrasing from memory, so if there is any inaccuracies, then forgive me.
11. Droid_X_Doug posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:10 1 0
Which is why there is a lot of interest nowadays in patents - for defensive purposes as well as offensive.
6. taco50 (banned) posted on 08 Nov 2011, 13:27 1 7
4. remixfa posted on 13 min ago
considering how often apple gets busted for stealing code, you dont have a leg to stand on.
Care to share some documented examples?
7. JonnyV posted on 08 Nov 2011, 13:47 6 1
NewsStand, swipeable Notification Bar, Cloud Sync, and Reminders app just to name a few.
15. taco50 (banned) posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:20 1 9
You obviously don't understand the difference between code and feature.
Apple has had cloud services for ten years.
Reminder app? That's like saying android copied Apple by having a phone app and web browser.
I'll give you notifications though
22. iankellogg posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:37 5 2
mobileMe was a joke and hardly considered the modern definition of cloud services. to be fair, google just recently got into the cloud business themselves.
30. remixfa posted on 08 Nov 2011, 19:54 3 0
taco, google was the first major company to jump head first into the cloud.. apple is a follower..
31. taco50 (banned) posted on 08 Nov 2011, 20:32 1 5
Apple had cloud services before Google. You're wrong as usual.
Originally launched on January 5, 2000, as iTools, a free collection of Internet-based services for users of Mac OS 9, Apple relaunched it as .Mac on July 17, 2002, when it became a paid subscription service primarily designed for users of Mac OS X.
35. remixfa posted on 09 Nov 2011, 07:16 0 0
thats not the cloud, thats tools on the internet. And if you REALLY want to go there, google has had tools on its google.com start up page pretty much since the beginning.
"in the cloud" generally refers to storage outside of normal sources like hard drives, cds, and other "local" media... not to a few apps on a web page which have existed LOOOONG before 2000.. lol
18. remixfa posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:27 11 1
HTC (and google by proxy)
multiple anti trust and anti monopoly cases
Apple and AT&T Mobility antitrust class action
Creative Technology patent dispute
Typhoon Touch Technologies touch screen patents
Kodak v. Apple
St. Clair Sues Apple For Copyright Infringement
S3 has hit Apple with yet a patent infringement lawsuit
Design infringement on the ipad
Apple Getting Sued For Trademark & CopyWrite Infringement over iCloud
VIA sues Apple over infringing on three microprocessorrelated patents
And thats just the first few pages of google search on the subject out of dozens of pages.. and i didnt even include some of the wackier ones like the iBird lawsuit.
Get your head out of your butt and quit pretending that apple is somehow superior.
8. JonnyV posted on 08 Nov 2011, 13:53 6 1
Smartphones have been in existance since 1992, when the Simon was introduced by IBM. Countless other touchscreen phones followed. Apple didn't create the Iphone until 2007. So I would say Apple stole a good deal of the technology from others. I have no stance on whether Apple is better than Android or vice versa and could care less about your incessant trolling. Just get your facts straight before you try to flaunt your almighty Apple products.
23. JonnyV posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:42 5 1
Resorting to personal attacks now? I am curious, do you have any other purpose on PA other than trolling? If you are attempting to upset me, sorry to say, you will fail.
32. s.mrabet posted on 09 Nov 2011, 03:35 0 0
Taco50, everytime I read one of your comment, it seems your head is getting deeper in Steve Job's ass.
14. AhmadAlsayegh posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:19 1 0
to all stupid corporates, you are misusing technology!
17. snowgator posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:26 3 0
I am really sickened by the thought of WeBOS being reduced to patent troll status. It is a jewel among crap right now. I hope anyone other than Oracle gets it. HP desearves to take a huge, painful loss for their stupid inability to make this work.
20. putes posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:29 2 1
webOS is cursed... kill it before it hurls the Earth into a super massive black hole.
24. ngo2dd posted on 08 Nov 2011, 14:50 2 0
Many of you people like The_Miz and Taco don't realize that the patent that Google is infringing are not Oracle patent, They were Suns before oracle bought them out. It is crazy how a company can buy and acquire patent and then sue another company with patent they did not create nor help create.
The judge in the case already told Oracle that the amount of money they want was too much. How is Google hurting Oracle with those infringement, when Oracle only acquire Sun around 1 or 2 year ago is the question people need to being asking. And if Google is infringing one Oracle patent then it mean Apple is too if Android is a copy of iOS like what Taco and The_Miz has been saying.
25. TKFox007 posted on 08 Nov 2011, 15:21 1 0
How is it that if you're in a legal battle over patents, that you can buy someone else's patent portfolio to use as ammunition in your case that's already going on?
Oracle: Look, they're infringing on this patent that I bought today, I didn't have it before, but now I do and they're infringing on it, make them stop.
How can they get away with that?
28. Droid_X_Doug posted on 08 Nov 2011, 15:34 2 0
"How can they get away with that?"
Capitalism? In the U.S., when you purchase an asset, unless there are hold-backs, the purchaser gets all rights attached to the asset, which includes any existing patent rights.
29. master0fursinz posted on 08 Nov 2011, 19:35 3 1
i hope google takes a run at web os purchase. this will make android far more sexy incorporating app tabs, gestures and the like.