HTC Desire 626 Review

8comments

Introduction


One of the biggest surprises in the area of the mobile scene this year is the war that’s been waging in the entry-level segment – you know, phones that are priced below $200. Taking into account that carriers have totally ditched the subsidy model that we’ve all been accustomed to following, it’s going to be even more crucial for phones to really show that they have a ton of value for the money. Even though it’s been a tough year for HTC, the Taiwan-based company is always continuing to diversify its robust portfolio. This time, here comes the HTC Desire 626. Knowing what’s out there already, can this sub-$200 offering stand out in a sea already filled with some killer options?

The package contains:

  • HTC Desire 626
  • microUSB cable
  • Wall charger
  • Stereo headphones
  • Get start guide
  • Important information

Design

It’s the same old, very predictable design. Still, it’s pretty charming.

By now, HTC’s Desire line has followed a particular and predictable design language that hasn’t seen any dramatic changes in the last couple of years. So, to no one’s surprise, the HTC Desire 626 follows in familiar fashion with its two-toned, all-plastic construction. Our particular unit, the marine white variant, combines a white body with a blue colored accent, but it comes in other color combinations that we find charming. It’s certainly not an original design, that’s for sure, as it boasts many of the traits we’ve come to expect from the Desire line.

In standard Desire fashion, its buttons and ports are found in their usual locations – so that means the power and volume controls on its right edge, 3.5mm headphone jack on top, SIM and microSD card slots on its left, and microUSB port on the bottom. Initially, it seems like it stays faithful to HTC’s practice of offering dual front-firing speakers, but it’s only the bottom grill that’s used for audio output, as the top one is reserved for the earpiece only.


HTC Desire 626
Dimensions

5.78 x 2.79 x 0.32 inches

146.9 x 70.9 x 8.19 mm

Weight

4.94 oz (140 g)

Motorola Moto G (2015)
Dimensions

5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches

142 x 72.4 x 12.2 mm

Weight

5.47 oz (155 g)

Microsoft Lumia 640
Dimensions

5.56 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches

141.3 x 72.2 x 8.8 mm

Weight

5.11 oz (145 g)

Asus ZenFone 2
Dimensions

6 x 3.04 x 0.43 inches

152.5 x 77.2 x 10.9 mm

Weight

6.00 oz (170 g)

HTC Desire 626
Dimensions

5.78 x 2.79 x 0.32 inches

146.9 x 70.9 x 8.19 mm

Weight

4.94 oz (140 g)

Motorola Moto G (2015)
Dimensions

5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches

142 x 72.4 x 12.2 mm

Weight

5.47 oz (155 g)

Microsoft Lumia 640
Dimensions

5.56 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches

141.3 x 72.2 x 8.8 mm

Weight

5.11 oz (145 g)

Asus ZenFone 2
Dimensions

6 x 3.04 x 0.43 inches

152.5 x 77.2 x 10.9 mm

Weight

6.00 oz (170 g)

Compare these and other phones using our Size Comparison tool.

Display

The subdued tone of the display makes it tough for it to stand out.

Accompanied with a 5-inch 720 x 1280 Super LCD screen, it certainly fits the bill for a phone in its price category. Neither exceptionally detailed with its 294 ppi pixel density, nor polarizing with its qualities, the display at the very least is effective for everyday use. Surprisingly enough, the panel favors a warmer tone with its ~6300K color temperature, which is close to the ideal reference value if 6500K. Topping it off too, is the fact that it’s able to accurately reproduce most of the color gradients in the sRGB color spectrum chart – save for the colors of green, which have a sprinkling of yellow to them. There are undoubtedly some good qualities about the screen, but there’s just this subdued tone that prevents it from being livelier to the eye.





Interface and Functionality

It’s Sense 7.0 that we all know by now, so there’s nothing really new here.

The HTC Desire 626 is greeted to the same Sense experience we all know and love. Even now, it remains to be one of the more likable experiences, especially for a budget conscious phone, seeing that it blends Sense 7’s modern and appealing design language with a simplified and straightforward approach. Therefore, we get staple Sense features such as HTC BlinkFeed for social networking aggregation, and the HTC Sense widget that offers meaningful apps recommendations based on our usage and location.

Now, the only thing really missing here are the various Motion Launch gestures we get in HTC’s higher-end offerings. Regardless of that, the Sense 7.0 experience on top of Android 5.1 Lollipop is highly versatile and customizable to appeal to such a broad range of folks. However, on the other side of the spectrum, it really doesn’t bring anything new to the table that we haven’t experienced on other recent HTC devices.

Processor and Memory

The choice of the going with the Snapdragon 210 chip results in a choppier, less responsive performance.

Out of everything, it’s rather perplexing to know that HTC has opted to put in a quad-core 1.1GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 SoC inside of the Desire 626, as opposed to the Snapdragon 400 chip used by other similarly spec’d phones. The result, though, is a performance that undoubtedly lacks the finesse to really match what the Moto G 2015 puts out. Sure, basic operations are all handled in a good manner, but just expect load times to be longer – plus, it’s definitely not suited for gaming due to its choppiness. The 1.5 GB of RAM the Desire 626 is equipped with tend to be sufficient for most tasks.

Out of the box, its 16 GB of advertised storage translates to a real-world tally of 9.74GB. Certainly, that amount is still miniscule, but it’s nice to know that there’s a microSD slot to supplement it.

AnTuTuHigher is better
HTC Desire 62617396
Motorola Moto G(2015)22406
Microsoft Lumia 64011945
Asus ZenFone 241442
Vellamo MetalHigher is better
HTC Desire 626688
Motorola Moto G(2015)1224
Asus ZenFone 21368
Vellamo BrowserHigher is better
HTC Desire 6261450
Motorola Moto G(2015)2186
Asus ZenFone 23407
SunspiderLower is better
HTC Desire 6262337.3
Motorola Moto G(2015)1361.8
Microsoft Lumia 6401231.1
Asus ZenFone 2789.5
GFXBench T-Rex HD on-screenHigher is better
HTC Desire 6268.9
Motorola Moto G(2015)9.6
Microsoft Lumia 6407
Asus ZenFone 227.6
GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 on-screenHigher is better
HTC Desire 6263.9
Motorola Moto G(2015)3.9
Asus ZenFone 212.7
Basemark OS IIHigher is better
HTC Desire 626372
Motorola Moto G(2015)581
Asus ZenFone 21243
Geekbench 3 single-coreHigher is better
HTC Desire 626293
Motorola Moto G(2015)528
Asus ZenFone 2908
Geekbench 3 multi-coreHigher is better
HTC Desire 626989
Motorola Moto G(2015)1554
Asus ZenFone 21938

Internet and Connectivity


For those who have a lot of patience and don’t necessarily get annoyed by small, trivial things like minor delayed responses, they’ll find the web surfing experience tolerable with the Desire 626. Having more than enough real estate to work with, complex pages load fairly quickly, but it’s noticeable that navigational controls and page rendering aren’t accompanied with the same high-level responses we get from top-tiered phones.

Our exact review unit of the Desire 626, AT&T’s variant, is equipped with the necessary GSM radios to make it a world traveler, but Verizon’s version offers CDMA support in addition to GSM to give it greater compatibility. Besides that, it’s acquainted with the usual set of connectivity features – so expect to find aGPS with Glonass, Bluetooth 4.1, and 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi. Sorry people, there’s no NFC here.





Camera

A passable 8 MP shooter that will not inspire you in any way.

Looking into the Desire 626’s camera hardware, it’s presented with an 8-megapixel main rear camera and 5-megapixel front camera combo. The camera interface is the same as that on other Sense 7.0 running phones. However, its shooting modes have been whittled down to only 3 main modes – automatic, HDR, and panoramic. The front camera forgoes having any sort of beautifying options.


Understandably, the camera’s performance is mostly underwhelming. Well, we shouldn’t expect too much considering that we’re dealing with an entry-level offering here, but nonetheless, a slightly more composed shooter would have been much appreciated. Fine details are almost non-existent, as it captures photos that appear somewhat smudgy, which becomes more apparent when there’s less lighting in the shot. Even though digital noise is kept to a minimum in extreme low-light situations, its quality is just too fuzzy and the lack of fine details deprive it from being a strong candidate. However, we do like how its HDR mode performs under high-contrast scenes by focusing on the shadows to giving them increased exposure.


Taking a picLower is betterTaking an HDR pic(sec)Lower is betterCamSpeed scoreHigher is betterCamSpeed score with flashHigher is better
HTC Desire 6264.7
No data
397
334
Motorola Moto G(2015)3.4
5
658
641
Microsoft Lumia 6404.5
No data
293
277
Asus ZenFone 26.2
No data
354
230

The problem is not that it maxes out at 720p resolution, but the fact that it produces unbelievably soft and subdued details, which isn’t aided by the heavy noise and crackly voices that its microphone picks up.



Multimedia

While it’s usable for watching videos, its speaker performance is subdued and lacks depth.

Jumping over to the Sense music player, it features the same visuals and operations we’re familiar with – so that includes a nifty looking visualizer option while playing a song. The 72.5 dB of power being produced by its internal speaker is just ample enough for close confined spaces, but its thin toned production prevents it from having a commanding presence.

Video playback isn’t an issue at all with the HTC Desire 626, as 1080p clips play smoothly without any evidence of choppiness.



Headphones output power(Volts)Higher is better
HTC Desire 6260.58
Motorola Moto G(2015)0.377
Microsoft Lumia 6400.615
Asus ZenFone 20.428
Loudspeaker loudness(dB)Higher is better
HTC Desire 62672.5
Motorola Moto G(2015)78.5
Microsoft Lumia 64068.7
Asus ZenFone 272.7




Call Quality

It has its challenges, but the quality is more than acceptable to use when background noise is minimized.

Generally speaking, the Desire 626 is more than handy for phone calls. For starters, the earpiece produces extremely potent voices that make it very easy for us to hear them in even the noisiest of conditions. However, the microphone tends to make voices sound raspy on the other end of the line – while the subdued output of the speakerphone makes it challenging to use.

Battery

For a 2000 mAh battery, it has good longevity.

Don’t be quick to judge this one and its 2000 mAh battery cell, because it achieves better results than some other phones with beefier sized batteries. Judging from our custom battery benchmark test, the HTC Desire 626 obtains a respectable mark of 6 hours and 32 minutes. That’s pretty good in our book, but it’s made better knowing that it’s more than long lasting to get us through at least a solid one-day of normal, real world usage.

Battery life(hours)Higher is better
HTC Desire 6266h 32 min(Average)
Motorola Moto G(2015)8h 3 min(Average)
Asus ZenFone 27h 34 min(Average)
Full Charge(hours)Lower is better
HTC Desire 6262h 16 min
Motorola Moto G(2015)4h 11 min
Asus ZenFone 20h 58 min
Microsoft Lumia 6403h 16 min

Conclusion


Right now, the 2015 edition of the Moto G is the benchmark that many folks will use to compare phones that are within the same scope. Indeed, the HTC Desire 626’s outright price point of $185 makes it an attractive offering, especially if you find its tailored design to be better, but it’s still a somewhat underperforming package that doesn’t threaten the Moto G in terms of functionality. Well, that’s pretty concerning because you’re going to fork over just a smidgen more for it – plus, it lacks the better specs of the Moto G. We won’t deny that HTC has something tangible here for consumers who don’t want to spend a fortune on their next phone and are looking for a good-looking handset, but we just expect better results everywhere to keep it in the same pedestal as some of the other prized options out there.

Software version of the review unit:
Android Version: 5.1
HTC Sense Version: 7.0
Build Number: 1.10.502.1
Kernel Version: 3.10.49-perf-g61b738f


Video Thumbnail




Pros

  • Inexpensive $185 outright cost
  • Charming design
  • Strong volume with the earpiece
  • Expandable storage

Cons

  • Camera image white balance is often off
  • Atrocious 720p video recording quality
  • Choppy performance with heavier operations
  • Subdued speakerphone output

PhoneArena Rating:

7.0

Recommended Stories

Loading Comments...
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless