x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Security expert Kaspersky says iOS and Android are the most vulnerable platforms

Security expert Kaspersky says iOS and Android are the most vulnerable platforms

Security expert Kaspersky says iOS and Android are the most vulnerable platforms
The CEO of Kaspersky, Eugene Kaspersky, said during a conference held in Australia that Windows Phone is a safer platform than iOS and Android. While he says that the most dangerous scenario is with the iPhone, it also is less probable because of the closed nature of iOS. "Criminals are obsessed with iOS and there are many, many vulnerabilities," noted the security expert. He notes that if the worst-case scenario happens and millions of iPhones are infected, there will be no third party antivirus fix available because such developers don't have the rights to create one.

Kaspersky says that while Android is as dangerous as iOS with "millions of brutal attacks," he says that Windows Phone is "so far very clean." He also explained that with 97% of mobile users doing some activity that revealed a password, like mobile banking, the sector has become the place for criminals to scour for vulnerabilities.

"The most dangerous scenario is with iPhones. It is less probable because it is very difficult to develop malware for iPhones, because the operating system is closed to outside programmers. But every system has a vulnerability. If it happens—in the worst-case scenario, if millions of the devices are infected—there is no antivirus, because antivirus companies do not have any rights to develop true end-point security for Apple."-Eugene Kaspersky

According to Kaspersky, there is an easy way to remove your mobile device as a target, regardless of the platform you use. "You know how to protect your computers and devices – disconnect them from the internet!" Interestingly, the security expert does not own a smartphone. Instead, he uses an old Sony Ericsson feature phone for mobile communications.

source: ITWire via WMPoweruser

  • Options

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 14:50 5

1. carlemillward (unregistered)

Is this not general knowledge...

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:32

10. Simona (unregistered)

I just checked there is no even ONE antivirus app for iphone ... I know why..

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 23:19

35. kudus (Posts: 52; Member since: 23 Oct 2014)

hey, you forgot abt the icloud account can be hacked ! haha

posted on 11 Jun 2015, 00:05

36. whoami_amiu (Posts: 12; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)

AVIRA and MCaFee is readily available in IOS appstore. Check on your PC browser itself on itunes store

posted on 11 Jun 2015, 14:04

41. An.Awesome.Guy (Posts: 410; Member since: 12 Jan 2015)

I have not seen any "anti virus/ AV" word there.
They aren't antiviruses but apps for locating your device and other features.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:40

11. marorun (Posts: 5029; Member since: 30 Mar 2015)

Nope its not.

Apple purist say the iphone is impossible to infect with virus and have no vulnerability :)

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 16:03 4

15. Simona (unregistered)

yeah right .. full of C***P

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 16:58

20. Marienx (Posts: 92; Member since: 27 Aug 2013)

The freaking truth is that these same antivirus companies pay hackers to explode your OS's with viruses, or create they viruses themselves so you buy their programs. If not, explain how the f**k you get offered all these antivirus programs right after you have been infected?

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 17:23

23. waddup121 (unregistered)

very cool

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 14:52 14

2. HappySocks (unregistered)

Food expert McDonalds says Burger Kings food is bad

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:41 7

12. marorun (Posts: 5029; Member since: 30 Mar 2015)

This would be valid if its would be google making this acusation toward Apple.

What you say make no sense!

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:51 2

13. sgodsell (Posts: 4855; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)

Which OS again started all the virus, malware and spyware scanner software again? Please enlighten all of us here.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 16:23 3

17. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 2226; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)

Which OS erupted in quick succession that it caused attackers not to care about OS's that not many people use?

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 16:58 3

19. AlikMalix (unregistered)

No, Happysocks does have a point. I mean in order to sell your product you must influence the need for it. Google is one thing, but Apple isn't exposed the same way: number of outdated android versions multiplied by market share in undeceloped counties where cyber laws aren't enforced as much as they're in 1st world countries (where Apple and android are nearly 50/50 in market share).

Basically his analogy should say: certain meat distributer says McDonald's and burger king food is bad and they should allow his meat in burgers instead.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 18:18 2

27. tedkord (Posts: 14114; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)

Why would anyone target phones in underdeveloped countries? What are they going to steal?

Your almost 50/50 stat is seriously off, too. Even in the US, Apple's home country where you can get an iPhone for $1 on contract, it's more like 54-44. In fact, for the 3 months ending in April (most recent Kandar numbers) it was 62-33 in the US, 54-35 UK, 68-18 France, 74-17 Germany, 69-16 Italy, 88-9 Spain, 74-24 China, 51-46 Japan, 54-37 Australia. That pretty much covers the first world.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 18:37 4

28. AlikMalix (unregistered)

Thanks I might have had my stats confused with Apple vs Samsung.

Good ppoint on the "attack on developing countries". But you've probably haven't visited India, Korea, Eastern Europe, South America - they're much more advanced than you think and many are living comfortable lives - it only takes small scams in bulk to gather quite a lot of info/resources or whatever it is a scammer/hacker is after.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 14:53 3

3. Anterv (Posts: 178; Member since: 09 Jul 2014)

Why is that guy being mentioned everywhere ? How Kaspersky is different from other antivirus companies ? It eats alots of resources, has not the best detection rate and the name is not sympatic.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:25 1

9. fernancgf (Posts: 15; Member since: 30 Dec 2014)


Karspersky has a history in security, have bigger historical databases that any other security service provider, the only old and big antivirus brands that I can remember are McAffee and Norton and they are far less popular...

Think in Karspersky as Google and the others antivirus as Cyanogenmod... They can be good but stock android is stock android, and Google is the one that creates the developer kits, and the one that brings a new version of android every year, and the one that have a Market Place, and the one that develops Google Wear, and the one that have all the Google Services and Project Ara and Google VR and the list continues... The others can have some good tricks and be better in some things but Google have a far, far, far, better and stable pack...

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:01

4. My1cent (Posts: 370; Member since: 30 Jan 2014)

Peek a Boo! I see you. Welcome to the cyber world, Mr. and Ms.prospect!

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:06

5. Credo (Posts: 749; Member since: 19 Apr 2012)

O really? What a professional statement! I tought there where other popular platforms ...

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:10

6. theguy2345 (Posts: 1216; Member since: 24 Jun 2014)

Awesome. I like secure things. But eventually, this will become a major problem for the other two.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 21:26

32. joey_sfb (Posts: 6600; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)

People will believe what they want to believe.

Windows platform long virus history speak for themselves. Android with 80% market share is still more secure than a average Windows desktop. Reason being there no virus for Android that can destroy the whole computing device, just malware and spams. Windows have all three, virus, malware and spam.

The next billons new internet user are spared of the anguish and pain of having destructive virus on their desktop. How I envy them??? I have to reinstall my windows desktop over and over again due bad partitions and virus.

My result card for Google 80% right while Microsoft a flat line zero.

posted on 11 Jun 2015, 14:43

42. WallStreetWolf (Posts: 289; Member since: 08 Apr 2013)

Windows has existed for decades. The majority of business and government dealings are done on Windows machines, so they are an obvious target.

Now we have a shift to mobile devices taking priority over the common laptop or desktop. The new frontier is upon us already. People will be hacking and infecting the largest marketshare leader, Android. That doesn't mean Android sucks, it just means they are going to take the place of Windows in terms of target priority as time goes on. It is par for the course. Android hasn't existed long enough for it to have a security report card against Windows PC OS.

The most common reason for computer threats manifesting on a PC can be almost certainly blamed on the user. Ignorance is biggest problem. You need to be cautious and responsible as a Windows user. I purchased my own personal computer 11 years ago and to this day, I still haven't had a virus on it. I still own it and the only time I have ever had to do serious repair was when the hard drive failed.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:18 2

7. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 2226; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)

This is what Linux fanboys don't get.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 15:56 1

14. sgodsell (Posts: 4855; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)

Its funny that Linux is running the majority of the web, mainframes, super computers, and IoT devices, as well as SBC (small board computers). IoT is the next wave of computing, but it will be the dominant force for driving IoT. It currently is.

Hey even Apple released their swift for OS/X, iOS, and Linux. Linux is Apples only way into IoT.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 16:08 1

16. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 2226; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)

I'm not sure who you're responding to, but if certain users wanna use Linux then good for them, as long as they use it appropriately, which most Linux users don't seem to be doing, nowadays.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 17:27 1

24. sgodsell (Posts: 4855; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)

Please do tell us how users should be using Linux. Enlighten us with your great knowledge of wisdom, or lack thereof. For instance Linux is your ONLY option for so many of the IoT devices or SBC's. Like I said above, Swift is Apples foray and the only option to break into IoT. The reason why it will always be like this is because both Apple and Microsoft cannot make their OS's support all the boards that are currently on the market. Microsoft foray into IoT only supports a few boards, and their OS requires boards with 1 GB of ram, and 8 GB of storage as a minimum. There is just too many boards (IoT), with different processors with limited ram, different sensors, or supported hardware. Linux is here to stay forever and will dominate IoT. Like or not. With IoT projected to generate $19 trillion dollars by the year 2022. If people don't get into or use Linux for IoT, then they will be DOA.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 17:53 2

25. theguy2345 (Posts: 1216; Member since: 24 Jun 2014)

I don't think you understand what he is trying to say.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 21:33 1

33. joey_sfb (Posts: 6600; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)

XperiaFanZone, please share with us specifically which Linux distribution are you referring to.

What kind of computing tasks are you doing on that linux system and the specific problem you have faced?

Problem with a lot of people here talk out of their ass without actual experience. I want to learn therefore i always try them out myself before i comment otherwise i will just tell the true, i have no experience with it so no opinion.

posted on 10 Jun 2015, 19:05

29. sip1995 (Posts: 1687; Member since: 07 Feb 2014)

You forgot to say about the Windows too.....at least it's what the majority of people use.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories