Intel announces "Quark" processors to power wearable devices

Intel announces "Quark" processors to power wearable devices
Intel fell behind in the mobile race which has been dominated by ARM processors so far, but the company has slowly been pushing its way back in. The company definitely doesn't want the same thing to happen with the upcoming wave of wearable devices; so, today the company unveiled its new line of "Quark" processors, which it plans to be in smartwatches and other wearables.

The Quark processors are going to be incredibly small, and power efficient. According to Intel, they will be one-fifth the size of the smallest Atom processor, and it will use one-tenth of the power. Intel CEO Brian Kraznich said of the applications for the new chip:

Intel will have samples of the new chip design ready for the fourth quarter this year, but we shouldn't expect to see Quark in wide use until next year. The first run of the chips will likely find their way into "embedded" technologies, also referred to as "the Internet of things" (a term which recently made it into the dictionary.)

source: WSJ



8. ZeroCide

Posts: 819; Member since: Jan 09, 2013

x86 FTW!!!

4. goojman

Posts: 59; Member since: Oct 29, 2012

I'd love to see where technology will be in 5 or even 10 yrs from now.. Such exciting times were in!!

2. Captain_Doug

Posts: 1037; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

This really would be great for smart watches. Hadn't thought about that.

1. Shatter

Posts: 2036; Member since: May 29, 2013

Every day intel and AMD get closer to killing arm.

3. phil2n

Posts: 519; Member since: Apr 30, 2012

in short they\'re still far

5. TheLolGuy

Posts: 483; Member since: Mar 05, 2013

Intel is inching closer, and AMD is getting hurt. AMD doesn't exactly offer the most energy efficient processors. They're working on it, but mobile Haswells are threatening Kabini/Temash in efficiency... For their sake and ours, I hope their APU strategy succeeds -- and that they can also make some strides in improving energy efficiency too...

6. Shatter

Posts: 2036; Member since: May 29, 2013

Their newer APUs are good replacements for low end graphics card. Their Best APU right now the 6800k is between a GT 630 and a GT 640 or the equal of an $70-80 graphics card in short. AMD will gain ground from people who want cheap gaming windows 8 tablets after they fix their power consumption. Still 8670D is no where close to a high end graphics card even more like 5 years ago. Doubt it can handle next gen games above low..

7. TheLolGuy

Posts: 483; Member since: Mar 05, 2013

Their rumored upcoming Kaveri will have a graphics core next iGPU, so it'll be the strongest yet for an APU -- the problem is that with unified memory, RAM has to be soldered on and is thus unreplaceable. It also means that to not hamstring the iGPU, it needs higher bandwidth ram which costs a lot more (both higher clocked DDR3 and GDDR5) with penalties in latency that could limit CPU performance. If they use expensive RAM it could offset any pricing advantage they have. For their Temash successors, that kind of bandwidth RAM isn't needed yet, and so I think it will offer the best quality graphics yet, for tablets/tops anyway...

9. livyatan

Posts: 867; Member since: Jun 19, 2013

"ARM IS GOING TO CANNIBALIZE X86, and we plan to be the leader in ARM" Andrew Feldman, vice president of AMD server business unit. You ignorant idiot!!

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless