Google targeting "the next billion" with free services
posted by Ray S. / Nov 08, 2012, 9:03 AM
Free Zone, accessible through the g.co/freezone domain should work with almost any internet-enabled phones (mainly featurephones). It's not optimized for smartphones, but should work on those as well. There are some simple rules to using Free Zone: everything is for free, except for clicking a link that goes out of Google+, viewing an email attachment or clicking a link that's found on a webpage that has been a search result. That last one means that when you've done a Google search, you're free to click on any result you like, and you won't be charged for that. But if you have clicked on, say, result 3, and then you click on a link that's found on the webpage of result 3, then data charges will apply. Thankfully, each time there's danger of being charged for data traffic, there will be a pop-up warning.
Obviously, this service requires Google to partner with a lot of carriers around the world, its roll-out won't be very quick. And, as we said, it's designed for emerging markets, so it's likely that it won't come to the U.S. or Europe. Free Zone has just launched in the Philippines with the carrier Globe. If the service turns out to be a success, Google will probably expand it to other locations as well.
source: Google via Reuters
Posts: 23; Member since: Nov 06, 2012
Wishing you all the very best, good luck, we are all behind you!
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 9:06 AM 11
Posts: 1236; Member since: Sep 26, 2012
Only Google can do it....make a billion and still provide free stuff :) Unlike certain fruit companies that are just too greedy...ok i know i'm trollin but I'm allowed too once in a while :) Best of Luck Google!
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 9:21 AM 18
Apple isn't in the business of giving things out for free. Before you thumb me down, neither are most companies. Google has a unique business model that allows them to offer products for free in exchange for user information. This, of course, is used to sell ads. Nothing is ever for free. With Google, you pay with your information. Not a bad thing, just the way it works.
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 4:15 PM 4
How can google offer something free that was never paid for?
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 10:26 AM 1
Jesus. Are you kidding me? Read the article atleast! Google services accessed via the url g.co/freezone won't be counted under your data consumption. Hence, "free".
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 10:41 AM 14
Posts: 645; Member since: Oct 23, 2011
Apple's worst supporters are usually the quick draw types who can't comprehend anything, just shoot off at the mouth. This sounds like an interesting idea, how will it pan out, only time will tell.
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 11:34 AM 9
Posts: 4769; Member since: Mar 07, 2012
"Sometimes it looks like he just comments after reading the title."...shouldn't it be "Sometimes it looks like he just reads after commenting."? Correct me if i'm wrong, but that sounds more appropriate for Mxyzptlk
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 5:20 PM 2
Nothing is ever free. There's a cost somewhere in there and it will pass down onto someone. Carriers also have to agree to it according to the article making the rollout a little slow. i guess this means i did read the article.
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 11:29 PM 0
Posts: 592; Member since: Jul 05, 2012
It's more than unlikely that it will come to the US -- it's probably illegal. It sounds like a net neutrality violation. A nice thing to do for those in developing countries, but in the US, it would give Google an unfair advantage against its competitors. If it is somehow net neutral, this would still be more ammunition against Google in their anti-trust investigation.
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 2:25 PM 0
Posts: 494; Member since: Sep 21, 2012
And here I'm thinking that tens of million of Americans could benefit from this, but that the reason it may not happen is the carriers' wish to only offer paid services.
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 3:50 PM 0
Posts: 592; Member since: Jul 05, 2012
The reason it's illegal has nothing to do with what carriers want. Landline ISPs really, really want net neutrality to be dropped by the FCC. Reason is, services like Netflix hurt Verizon, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, etc. If a customer can get Internet service and Netflix and not need to buy a cable package, that hurts the cable company. If net neutrality were dropped, these companies could conceivably throttle or even block competing services. Similarly, it would be possible for a company to ask for preferential service (i.e. Yahoo could pay Verizon to have Google slowed down, thus giving Yahoo an edge). Carriers could also benefit from a non-net neutral Internet. In this example, the carriers will get money from Google, and customers would be dissuaded from using Bing or Facebook. Google's "Free Zone" helps customers, but the barrier in place against such a service is there only to benefit consumers. And again, even if we lose net neutrality, Google is under investigation for anti-competitive practices. While I believe that Google has used its market power for good, this is still giving Google something of an unfair advantage.
posted on Nov 08, 2012, 4:08 PM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):