Eric Schmidt says Android isn't fragmented, just differentiated
posted by Michael H. / Jan 11, 2012, 2:08 PM
Our argument can be boiled down pretty easily: "fragmented" was a negative marketing word created by Apple to describe the Android ecosystem. It is a heavily biased word, which has unfortunately been picked up by the media at large. In our view, the Android ecosystem is at worst inconsistent, and at best unique. Eric Schmidt and CEO of Motorola, Sanjay Jha, want to change the language towards the positive side by saying that Android is "differentiated". Schmidt was even heard using this new company buzz word at CES recently.
Differentiated is certainly a better word to describe Android than "fragmented", but it does skew a bit too far positive for our tastes and doesn't take into account consumer confusion when looking at Android devices that don't have Google apps, or devices that have completely forked off of the main system like the Nook Color & Tablet and the Amazon Kindle Fire. Those kinds of inconsistencies are difficult for consumers and aren't understood well by many casual users.
source: TG Daily
Posts: 28; Member since: Nov 07, 2011
If one is too positive and one is too negative, then just call it "Differentiated fragmentation" That should even it out
posted on Jan 11, 2012, 2:44 PM 7
Posts: 103; Member since: Aug 09, 2011
cant help it,its the open sourced nature of android if android was like iOS (closed) which its thankfully not there wouldnt be any customization an thats the reason why android is so successful because everyone wants to personalize hat they have its something Apple and WP7 dont do yes it creates hiccups when it comes to the hardware and software but i can change themes i can flash roms void warrenty or not android is awesome!!!
posted on Jan 11, 2012, 3:16 PM 0
I think they are absolutely right that "fragmented" is something created by Apple. That says there is a right and wrong way to have an OS ecosystem. There is no right and wrong way just like there is no good or bad phone. There is only what works for users. Somethings work and are big successes, other things don't and no one buys it. Period. My problem, still, with Android is that a vast majority of their users can't always make educated guesses about the phone they are getting or the support they will get after the purchase or what apps they can and can't get. I don't think that's fair to them. If smartphones are now built for consumers, I think there has to be an easy way for consumers to know what they are getting into. I'm not sure if that's possible. If I want my phone to be supported for the next two years, I have to pray to God that Samsung is going to do it. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. I have to pray that my phone can get a sweet app my buddy is talking about...maybe it will, maybe it won't. I want consumers to know what they are getting into. With iOS or even Windows Phone, I know they will have support for at least two years. Android has an update range less than that from what a few surveys have said. I don't think that's right. Not Google's fault...but still. But that's me. It doesn't mean that I'm right or wrong. It's just an opinion. If Google is happy with how things are going then why change it? To appease the nerds? Don't bother because they aren't the main buying force. They need to do what's right for their customers...or rather...they need to do what keeps people buying their phones. In my opinion, it may be s**t. In others, it's perfect.
posted on Jan 11, 2012, 3:49 PM 3
Posts: 114; Member since: Nov 16, 2011
JeffdaBeat, I really appreciate when folks can come on here and make thought out, logical, and well spoken points. Kudos to you for that. While I understand the concerns that you do have about the Android ecosystem, I think it is worth noting a few things that address those exact concerns. As remix has mentioned in many post I've seen, the vast majority... something like 90% or higher... of Android devices are running 2.1 and up. And since 99% of all the applications on the market can all run on any version of Android 2.1 and higher there is no longer any real concern about which phone can download which app. Also, to further combat this exact concern Google developed ICS to do just that. Now that they are requiring all the manufacturers to include that "halo" (?) or whatever its called it will lead to faster and more unified software updates. Since you have to actually plug into iTunes for an iPhone to get an update it requires more cooperation from the user then the OTA updates provided through Android. I would be willing to be that the amount of people not on the latest version of software is probably pretty similar on both.
posted on Jan 11, 2012, 4:46 PM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):