13 terrible Windows Mobile smartphones from yesterday
posted by John V.
/ Apr 10, 2013, 1:23 PM
Below, I’ve complied some of the Windows Mobile smartphones we’ve collectively reviewed through the years, and uncovered some of the lowest scored devices. Some of them, I’ve personally reviewed several years ago, such as the abysmal LG Incite, but the handful of others were done by other fellow PhoneArena colleagues. Above all, it’s surprising to see that there was a rich mix between form factors with Windows Mobile devices – such as QWERTY devices, which are becoming rare occurrences nowadays. Anyway folks, here are 13 terrible Windows Mobile smartphones from yesterday.
13 terrible Windows Mobile smartphones from yesterday
41 Comments
1. ProblemSolver15
Posts: 370; Member since: Jun 14, 2010
I had the Verizon variant of the HTC Mogul. XV6800 if I remember correctly. For its time it was okay in terms of hardware. Ultimately, I ended up using it as a block to change my tire as the thing was a huge brick. I went through about 5 of them. The software was atrocious.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 1:37 PM 4
6. John.V
Posts: 99; Member since: May 27, 2011
I loved the XV6800 & its many variants. I owned the previous 6700 model for Sprint, then the updated HTC Tilt.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 2:40 PM 0
34. shreyas.s666
Posts: 83; Member since: Aug 24, 2012
@ John.V why don't you people block/ban this kind of bots from phonearena?
posted on Apr 11, 2013, 1:12 AM 0
2. xmusicianguy
Posts: 96; Member since: Jul 13, 2011
How bout the Motorola Q9m or the Samsung Omnia 1 both CDMA. The Omnia atleast had WiFi and a good camera. The touch screen was horrible. The Motorola had neither. I have em both and never use them. Instead I use my Razr Maxx HD and Bionic.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 1:54 PM 0
4. cdgoin
Posts: 614; Member since: Jul 28, 2010
How about a review of the best Windows Mobile phones that were released BEFORE iPhone and Android even existed ? The HTC Universal was my fave for a long time followed by the Dash and the Dash 3G, then the HD2 (although the HD2 was post iPhone). The Diamond touch I also really liked. Come to think of it HTC made some awesome phones back then, and was innovative as well.. Hopefully they can get thier mojo back.. BTW anyone else notice the HTC one seems to be more a mix of the Windows Mobile version of HTC sense with Windows Phone almost more than the Android its based on.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 2:21 PM 8
12. ˇಠ_ಠˇ
Posts: 40; Member since: Aug 29, 2012
phonearena.com/news/10-of-the-greatest-Windows-Mobile-smartphones-ever_id28911
Your welcome.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 3:15 PM 1
38. Nathan_ingx
Posts: 4766; Member since: Mar 07, 2012
John, Why is the Toshiba TG01 in the worst list while it also made it to the list of the greatest??????
posted on Apr 11, 2013, 4:20 AM 1
5. lallolu
Posts: 729; Member since: Sep 18, 2012
This is a summary of why windows Mobile OS failed at that time; it was mainly bad hardware. Microsoft was trying to put a powerful OS on a non-powerful hardware. It was a similar thing that almost killed Nokia. They kept on using s**tty hardware which was not adequate for their phones. I think Microsoft learnt from this which was why they gave manufacturers basic hardware requirements at the advent of windows phone 7 because people will only complaint about the software not mentioning the hardware.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 2:23 PM 1
14. TechBizJP08
Posts: 495; Member since: Mar 25, 2013
Back in the day you will say, oh I love this phone, but now that you have the most powerful phone, you can diss the old ones. But those were the ones that created the innovation we are having now. It may failed but it gave us the Idea to run a PC like operating system in such a small cramp hardware such as phone. Bottom line, the one who created the future was the past..
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 3:30 PM 0
31. sprockkets
Posts: 1612; Member since: Jan 16, 2012
ah yes, nothing about the software, no USB driver issues, no horrible syncing issues where activesync would stop for no reason when people had hundreds of contacts to sync, no issues with EAS never syncing on its own, no issues with WM5 and their brain dead decision to move syncing to a network card, so as to have every winsock and firewall program stop it from working, no issues requiring full wipes to fix no ring when calls come in, charging not working
No, nothing wrong with the software at all.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 10:51 PM 0
11. SleepingOz unregistered
Ah windows mobile, I can't believe I've been using that for a while. lol
Horrible UI with microscopic icons everywhere.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 2:49 PM 2
15. TechBizJP08
Posts: 495; Member since: Mar 25, 2013
Before we have the powerful OS running a less and not so good hardware. The one who is catching up with the OS was the hardware. But now, its the other way around. Its the hardware playing the catch up. You can see the most powerful hardware, for the software still not there yet. Maybe the gap maybe closer in the near future..
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 3:34 PM 0
16. Jurdiales
Posts: 138; Member since: Oct 10, 2012
I always wanted a Moto Q, I never had a Windows Mobile phone, but I like it because it was a Motorola and I wanted to try it... how good was it on their days?
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 3:40 PM 0
21. papss unregistered
Lol I had the blackjack, I had it until it died. Really a all around good phone then.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 5:43 PM 0
22. RORYREVOLUTION
Posts: 3131; Member since: Jan 12, 2010
lol wow thanks John V. for taking us way back. I completely forgot about the old WM devices.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 5:46 PM 0
24. tiara6918
Posts: 2263; Member since: Apr 26, 2012
PA should have included the omnia2(which is somewhere hidden and forgotten in my house)the combination of windows mobile 6.5 and touchwiz2 was a complete failure. That phone was totally laggy. There are also a bunch of useless buttons on the phone.
posted on Apr 10, 2013, 6:21 PM 0
25. KennethP4V
Posts: 33; Member since: Mar 15, 2013
hahah i used to have the LG Incite, i thought it looked kool, but it was crappy in term of quality. The screen scratches easily and then the software was a piece of crap too. The caller id basically worked whenever it felt like it and doesnt when it doesn feel like it. Sometimes when ppl call i would be able to see who it is, sometimes it doesnt even show.
Review rating – 6.5