In a bid to get regulators to approve the T-Mobile merger, Sprint puts down its own LTE network

In a bid to get regulators to approve the T-Mobile merger, Sprint puts down its own LTE network
T-Mobile and Sprint are awaiting regulatory approval for their $26.5 billion merger from the FCC and FTC. The FCC might have painted itself into a corner the other day by passing rules that force state and local governments to decide quickly whether or not to allow carriers to deploy 5G technology within their borders. The FCC says that this must be done to keep U.S. leadership of 5G technology. This is the same argument that T-Mobile and Sprint have made as to why their merger should be allowed to close.

However, when dealing with U.S. regulatory agencies, it is always a good idea to keep your hand on first base while trying to steal second. In other words, Sprint decided that it needed to employ another strategy to prove how badly its merger with T-Mobile needs to be approved. So the nation's fourth largest carrier included in a recent filing, a series of maps designed to show just how lacking its network really is.

The confidential illustration shows three maps comparing Sprint's footprint against its three stateside rivals, T-Mobile (magenta), Verizon (red) and AT&T (blue). But the best part was the wording above the maps. "Sprint's LTE Network footprint covers a much smaller geography and significantly fewer POPs than other national carriers." Keep in mind, those are Sprint's words. The title, also written by the Sprint propaganda team, reads "Sprint's Network Faces Severe Challenges."

There seems to be a disconnect between the maps on the infographic and the map on Sprint's own website, which shows much wider coverage. This may not be an apple-to-orange comparison, especially since Sprint's website says that the map "provides high-level estimates" of its wireless coverage, and it includes areas of non LTE coverage. It is interesting though, that when it needs to show consumers the breadth of its coverage, it produces a map with coast-to-coast yellow (see image at the top of this article). But when it sends a filing to regulators, the maps all of a sudden show how much Sprint needs to merge with T-Mobile to stay alive (see image directly below).

source: WaltBTIG



1. Dr.Phil

Posts: 2451; Member since: Feb 14, 2011

It depends on how you look at it. The best way to really gauge Sprints network is to look at Boost Mobile’s map since they pretty much exclusively rely on the Sprint network. If you look at that Sprint coverage map, you have to zoom in to see that majority of that coverage is roaming coverage. In fact, Sprint has on their website (I just checked) a roaming map which accurately depicts what is Sprint Network and what they receive through partnerships. So, while Sprint customers indeed have access to a larger coverage map, Sprint themselves have a very poor coverage using just their own towers.

2. torr310

Posts: 1676; Member since: Oct 27, 2011

To me, Sprint is a company becoming less relevant and fading away... they are not attractive to consumers. To merge with T-Mobile is probably a good thing to Sprint.

3. Jphones

Posts: 258; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

can you approve me now

4. talon95

Posts: 1000; Member since: Jul 31, 2012

They provide coverage in many places, that doesn't mean it's on their towers. They are saying building out their network or paying roaming fees is going to eventually sink them if they can't merge. Makes sense.

5. DarthJarJar

Posts: 63; Member since: Feb 01, 2018

My advice is to buy Sprint and lay off all of upper management (District managers and up). The employees that have worked for Sprint over the years have become a cancer.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.