Facebook faces Class Action suit over facial recognition on photos
by Alan Friedman / Apr 16, 2018, 10:54 PM
Facebook is creating and storing "face templates" based on facial characteristics found in photos. It has been doing this since 2010 so that it can automatically put a name to the face seen in a photograph. But according to the plaintiffs, this happens to violate the 2008 Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act, which prohibits companies like Facebook from collecting and storing the biometric data of consumers without their permission.
Facebook successfully requested that the case be moved from Illinois to San Francisco and its defense appears to be that the Illinois law is all about the use of biometric data such as fingerprints, retina and iris scans, voice prints, and scans of peoples' hands and faces. The company says that its "face templates" are not related to the state's Biometric Information Privacy Act. In addition, Facebook says that users can opt out of the feature.
The case goes back to 2015, and under the Illinois Act, Facebook can be fined $1,000 to $5,000 each time a person's image is used without permission. The company could end up writing a big check should it lose this case.
Facebook says that it is reviewing Monday's ruling that certifies the class action. A spokeswomen for the firm sent out an email that read, "We continue to believe the case has no merit and will defend ourselves vigorously."
Posts: 362; Member since: Sep 30, 2017
We need to force ban the Facebook completely like ZTE, Huawei etc.,
posted on Apr 16, 2018, 11:03 PM 4
Posts: 1499; Member since: Jul 12, 2016
I hope they don't see a penny, Facebook has operated within the law as far as I'm able to tell, it's not their fault no one reads the terms and conditions. I mean whats next? File lawsuits against all internet service providers and phone service providers. Verizon knows where you go, who you call, who you text, what websites you visit, etc. Do something to change the laws, don't punish corporations for playing ball by the corrupt rules put in place by congress.
posted on Apr 16, 2018, 11:45 PM 1
Posts: 71; Member since: Jan 24, 2011
YOU'RE WRONG I'm not a user of Facebook (for real). But from what I understand they use facial recognition on images that contain pictures of me. So, if only users can control their data, what are my rights? What about all the little children they do this to as well? Show me a 4 year old that can read the Facebook terms of service.
posted on Apr 17, 2018, 12:37 AM 2
Posts: 1269; Member since: Mar 16, 2017
If a friend of yours puts a picture of a group of people that includes you then it's your friends problem not Facebooks. You don't own the data your friend does and they have openly signed over the right for Facebook to use the data. And here comes the "it's for the children" defence. If any idiot is allowing a 4 year old to use Facebook, well they deserve everything they get. That is just fu*"ing stupidity in itself.
posted on Apr 17, 2018, 1:24 AM 2
Posts: 5469; Member since: Apr 05, 2013
It's not that Facebook has a picture that includes me that is the problem. It's that they use facial recognition that is the problem and no one but the person that is recognized can give consent. No other person can do that.
posted on Apr 17, 2018, 2:44 AM 2
Posts: 5469; Member since: Apr 05, 2013
Airports are still bound by law when it comes to how long this information is stored. Also, facial scanning at airports is when you travel and you are aware when airlines scan your face. So if you don't want to be scanned, you can choose not to travel. Facebook scanning my face, there is no choice.
posted on Apr 17, 2018, 3:14 AM 1
Posts: 360; Member since: Jan 30, 2014
TBH the privacy problem is not much of an issue compared to benefits FB offers.
posted on Apr 17, 2018, 5:23 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):