T-Mobile VP thinks AT&T merger will happen
posted by Michael H. / Sep 19, 2011, 4:46 PM
AT&T can build out its LTE network.The only support we've been hearing for this deal is from AT&T itself, which of course should probably support its own decisions, and T-Mobile for the same reasons. Now, the senior vice president of government affairs at T-Mobile, Tom Sugrue, has decided to voice his support (or parroting of AT&T). In a statement to the press, the random VP said exactly what AT&T has been repeating (because repetition creates truth in today's media), which basically amounts to: more innovation, enhanced competition, more jobs, blah blah, confident that "the facts will prevail" and everything will continue on as planned. At least no one is continuing to claim that the merger is the only way
That's certainly some clever wording: "enhanced competition", not more competition, or even better competition, but "enhanced", which is an adjective that means absolutely nothing when paired with the word competition. It could just as easily mean that the competition between AT&T and Verizon would be more intense, but even that isn't exactly good for customers.
Blah this i think this is going to go through......... Plus competition will dispaear once the father company of tmobile says, what the heck the deal didnt go through and i really dont want tmobile in USA so it will start to work on closing the network.
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 5:57 PM 0
Posts: 768; Member since: Nov 10, 2009
I am loyal T-Mobile customer since 2000 until now I cannot renew my contract because of the merger deal. When my contract end I will go straight to ATT or Verizon.
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 6:08 PM 1
Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008
that makes NO SENSE AT ALL. why in the world would you LEAVE TMO to GO to ATT?!?! Especially if your worried about the merger? you would only screw yourself Stay on Tmo, get one of the new super cheap plans and renew your contract. Ride the merger to ATT and keep your super cheap plan. If you dont want to be on ATT, then go to another carrier... but do not.. i repeat DO NOT be an idiot and leave Tmo to go to ATT before the merger... lololol
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 8:54 PM 3
18. ... unregistered
Don't b fooled by this fake self help Dr Phil. Every carrier has a flagship 79.99 single line plan. It all depends.on what u want vzw is.minimum minutes unlimited text plus additional.for data and a cap. At&t is minimum minutes text data cap as well. Sprint is any mobile anytime unlimited everything and t mobile is unlimited everything with 2gb of high speed data. They are not super cheap they just give u more for.the same price or a little less. Don't be fooled by the value plans either u pay full.price for.the device plus still sign a 2 year service agreement. If u get 500 minutes unlimited text n 5gb of data u pay 65 if 500 minutes is not enough then u pay 75 a month for unlimited everything with 5gb datadata
posted on Sep 20, 2011, 12:33 AM 0
i wonder what kind of drugs Tmobiles VP is on?? If they do merge(which is looking less likely everyday), Ill drop them like a hot rock. Tmobile has excellent customer. That would go away. AT&T has already tried to lie their way to this to the FCC and others. I just don't think it will happen now.
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 6:22 PM 1
Posts: 1994; Member since: Jun 15, 2011
It will be interesting to see tmobiles last fleeting efforts. I don't want to see tmobile merge with at&t and sprint tanking due to not being able to compete with verizon and at&t. They are already are loosing tons of customers. Can you imagine. Verizon and at&t. We would have tiered data plans at 100mb a month. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 7:34 PM 0
You would think that T-Mobile customer's would want this deal to happen. I can't remember where. But I have read that if the deal did not go thru then T-Mobile was still looking to sell, just to another carrier. So with that being a possibility also, wouldn't you at least want to be a part an established organization.
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 8:22 PM 2
Posts: 101; Member since: Jul 14, 2011
Why does at&t still have two "T"s when no one ues telegraphs anymore
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 10:54 PM 0
Posts: 3; Member since: Dec 19, 2010
I am the perfect example of a greedy at&t customer. I want it to happen so I can use more spectrum. TMO has bad service. I have plenty of friends who can never get signal or their messages come late. TMO has been on a decline. It will either die alone or we can kill it off with dignity. I want to use that spectrum. Sure, rumored prices of higher bills may happen or not happen. I don't mind paying premium for a great service here in Chicago. You pay cheap you get cheap. TMO is cheap and its bad. AT&T can cost a pretty penny but its reliability is amazing. Plus just by actual phones, at&t phones look way nicer than TMO's.
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 11:22 PM 1
Posts: 575; Member since: Apr 30, 2011
I never have a single problem with T-Mobile's service in Chicago and it has been this way for about ten years. I have friends that's using AT&T and service is spotty. AT&T has been raising mostly because of the poplar device, the iPhone. T-Mobile is definitely have smaller coverage comparing to the other three networks. The technology is definitely improving, only customers would not join T-Mobile mostly because of iPhone. For coverage and pricing, Verizon is definitely better than AT&T and it even offers the iPhone now. I wouldn't mind to have AT&T to buy over T-Mobile, but I strongly think it will be a monopoly. You simply cannot take a CDMA phone and ask to unlock it in order to use it in another country. There are way more people that everyone can imagine with such service. I do agree the move will definitely benefit everyone just because there will be more coverages and spectrums. If we tends to go this way, then we should have sprint and merge with Verizon. Maybe even after that, we can have AT&T and Verizon combine together and call it the America's truth network. Oh yeah by then, we will have no choice but to pay for whatever its asking for. We want the market to be more competitive.
posted on Sep 19, 2011, 11:57 PM 1
Posts: 1230; Member since: Aug 03, 2011
Really this deal should be blocked. You guys in the Us will get even higher carrier prices because of this. AT&T gets monopoly = higher price, just ask me. Here in sweden the state has monopoly on wine and spirits, and the price is very high here in sweden for wine and spirits. Not that i drink anything though, because i do not drink, i'm just giving this as a example. I think that this monopoly is a good thing though, since it make it more expensive to buy alcohol, and therefore less people are drinking here in sweden (if i'd rule, i'd ban alcohol all together ; )) this is just a example what monopoly gives, and i think this deal should not be allowed to go through.
posted on Sep 20, 2011, 5:26 AM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):