Samsungs's experts say under oath that Apple's patents are not as valuable as Apple thinks they are
posted by Alan F. / Apr 19, 2014, 4:35 PM
On Friday, Samsung called NYU professor Tulin Erdem to the stand, and his testimony was that Apple was relying on a flawed analysis by John Hauser that inflated the amount of the damages that Apple is seeking from its rival. The professor says that the study includes features that most consumers aren't even aware of. These features do not drive demand, according to Erdem. Hauser's study, which Apple presented earlier in the trial, claimed that these consumers are willing to pay $32 to $102 for the features covered by Apple's patents. "You are elevating artificially the importance, the value of these things," the professor said. "They are not even in the radar screen of consumers. These are very granular...and they wouldn't drive demand."
Erdem testified that she used eye-tracking studies to determine which phones people would buy. She discovered that people won't select a particular smartphone based on minor things. "It was the major things that drive demand," she said. On cross-examination, Apple tried to discredit Erdem's testimony by saying that her study failed to include such features as the processor, on-screen QWERTY and GPS. But another Samsung expert earlier on Friday, criticized Hauser's study for Apple, for failing to include the same exact things.
The Samsung expert who shot down Hauser's study was David Reibstein, professor of marketing at Wharton, who said that the study also did not take the brand of phone into consideration. Reibstein said that there are several factors that drive a consumer to buy a particular phone and none of them relate to the patents that Apple claims were infringed on by Samsung.
Closing arguments are expected on April 28th. After instructions from Judge Lucy Koh, the trial will be turned over to the jury.
source: Recode, CNET via AppleInsider
Posts: 367; Member since: Feb 02, 2012
"Samsungs's experts say under oath that Apple's patents are not valuable as Apple thinks they are" Under oath I say, that Shamesung word is worthless, as are morale. Just a punch of copycats. Lets hope, a trial punish them hard.
posted on Apr 19, 2014, 4:41 PM 9
Posts: 49; Member since: Jan 05, 2013
Apple is no less of a copycat, my friend.
posted on Apr 19, 2014, 4:48 PM 48
Posts: 5645; Member since: Feb 10, 2013
Apple tried to patent the android pattern unlock (at sure who used it first, but defiantly someone before Apple)
posted on Apr 19, 2014, 5:57 PM 9
Posts: 590; Member since: Oct 24, 2011
Everyone copies. Sad part is,that Samsung hasn't copied iPhone in a looong time. They stopped after Samsung Galaxy S OG
posted on Apr 19, 2014, 4:50 PM 25
I don't care how much money a company uses to make a phone. If I like it, I'm going to buy it. Lol. I'm sure the general public doesn't give a rats buttocks either. Point being in post 7: Samsung just brightens up Apples eternal spotlight. If they were confident in making a great phone, they wouldn't need to market in a way which needs to shoot down #1. Their insecurities can't be more clear than that lol.
posted on Apr 19, 2014, 5:29 PM 5
Posts: 6474; Member since: Jan 28, 2013
You should care. I don't like being ripped off so knowing how much each company spends on their customers shows me how much each manufacturer rips me off. Samsung rips me off the least which is nice to know. Apple on the other hand with their 20 billion in the bank and STILL raising prices and STILL insisting on reducing the ram from 16gb to 8gb in order to drop the price should tell you all that you need to know. Yes, if you were a smart shopper, you should care. Lol
posted on Apr 20, 2014, 10:55 AM 2
Posts: 17181; Member since: Jun 17, 2009
The ever moving goal posts. Show you a gold flagship, and that won't count because it doesn't have the power button on top. Apple was not the first to do a good phone. Not by a long shot. They copied the idea. That's the end of the story.
posted on Apr 20, 2014, 8:08 AM 2
Can't wait to see your comments when a large screened iphone is introduced. I wish I could have seen your comments when iphone got pull down notifications, command center, 4g lte, wallpapers, and answer a call with a message.
posted on Apr 20, 2014, 1:27 PM 1
Posts: 1986; Member since: Jul 07, 2012
Ah....are you guys illiterate or what???? Dunno the difference between copying and competition???? samsung has been making golden galaxies before ip5s.... and fingerprint sensor is not from apple...both buy from others..... and if this is a copy then....increase in screen is a copy....and what will you say about ios7???
posted on Apr 19, 2014, 8:25 PM 5
101. Sreddy unregistered
whats copying and competition then? Fingerprint is not from apple, i agree, both buys from others, true that, but why the delay with samsung? they are so fast to change, couldn’t they just do it before iphone does :/ the courts doesn’t just foolishly decides that yes samsung has to pay to apple for infringing patents
posted on Apr 20, 2014, 6:15 AM 0
Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010
If thats the case...why did Apple wait til after Motorola did the fingerprint scanner on the Atrix then? Why did Apple wait til other Android phones, tablets do LTE first then? Why wait to do a bigger iPhone and smaller iPad? What about all the features from other OS's that was added in iOS 6 and 7...? ....see how flawed that logic is?
posted on Apr 20, 2014, 6:51 AM 2
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):