Google Play Store officially allows paid apps to go on sale for free

Google Play Store officially allows paid apps to go on sale for free
Throughout the history of the Google Play Store, we've seen plenty of deals on apps, but for the most part the lowest price you would ever see during a sale would be around 10 cents. That low barrier has finally been broken as Google made it official that app sales can allow a paid app to be listed for free for a limited time, and done in a way that won't break the Top Paid Apps lists.

There were some rumors that this functionality was on the way but no one was quite sure. However, Google did make it official in a very low-key manner. Google didn't make an announcement of the change, but did post a support page for developers with details on how to go about making a paid app free temporarily. There are some rules and tweaks that developers will need to note though. 

As we said, this option is for limited time sales. Google had allowed developers to make a paid app free before but only as a permanent price change. This new option allows a paid app to be made free for anywhere between one and eight days, and sales of this nature must have at least 30 days between one ending and another beginning. And, it appears the reason it took Google so long to sort this out is because it wanted to make sure this sort of sale wouldn't affect the Play Store Top App lists. With that in mind, any downloads of an app that is temporarily free (and subsequent reinstalls of that app after the sale ends by someone who got it free) will not count as an app sale and therefore can't be gamed to cause the app to jump up the Top Paid Apps list. 

So far, we haven't heard of any apps taking advantage of this new option, so if you see any, let us know in the comments. 



1. Cod3rror

Posts: 142; Member since: Apr 06, 2013

If there is no incentive (getting to the top) for devs to make an app free, then why would they do it?

2. wargreymon

Posts: 764; Member since: Nov 05, 2013

In app purchases, ads revenue, extend user base.


Posts: 444; Member since: Mar 15, 2013

Well that what apple is doing for quite sometimes

4. Reybanz88

Posts: 102; Member since: Jul 28, 2016

Your point being? Let's not speak on who did what first. Apple will always lose that race.

5. sgtdisturbed47

Posts: 974; Member since: Feb 02, 2012

Should we compare Apple to some no-name irrelevant brand that nobody uses anymore? Because that's not how people tend to make comparisons. For what's widely available now and in the past 5 years, yes, Apple has been the first to allow sales on apps.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless