x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Not every problem with Android should be called "fragmentation"

Not every problem with Android should be called "fragmentation"

Posted: , by Michael H.

Tags:

Not every problem with Android should be called
Every single time we post an article about the next Android OS update, there is the inevitable calls about "fragmentation", and how Google should fix its "fragmentation" problem, which people claim is exacerbated simply by Google updating its platform. The trouble is that every problem with the Android platform is automatically attributed to "fragmentation", but this is a dangerous practice. Calling every issue "fragmentation" automatically shifts the blame to Google, because it insinuates that the issue is based in the Android system itself, when this is certainly not the case. The biggest problems with the Android platform are not the fault of the system itself, but rather the developers in the ecosystem and the manufacturers of the devices.

We've said as much before, specifically saying that the Android platform isn't fragmented, but it is inconsistent at worst and unique at best. The trouble is that people see any update as a furthering of some sort of "fragmentation" problem. But, here's the truth: every software platform in the world has multiple software versions and various hardware setups in the wild, and that includes Apple's iOS. We can't define "fragmentation" because it's definition has already been written by the most biased source possible: Apple. Apple would like us all to believe that somehow the device and software variation on Android is somehow a problem, when every platform has those same issues. 

More and more, the devices in our pockets are nothing more than extremely intricate computers, and no matter what, there will be variations in hardware and software on any computer system. Those variations can cause problems with specific hardware configurations, but overall everything works across versions. That's why your Windows XP machine at work can run the same software as your Windows 7 machine at home, or your OS X Mountain Lion can run the same apps as your cousin's OS X Leopard machine. Android, iOS and other mobile platforms are no different, except in Apple's definition, which makes Android somehow the odd one out. 

As we've said before, "fragmentation" is nothing more than a negative marketing buzzword coined by Apple to attack the up-and-coming Android platform that was threatening to (and eventually did) take Apple's mobile market share. There are two things that people often point to when claiming that Android is "fragmented": 1) multiple software versions and 2) various hardware setups. As we said, that doesn't make a platform "fragmented", because if it did, then every platform in the world is "fragmented". 

Apple's "fragmentation"

If those are the criteria for fragmentation, then Apple's iOS is just as guilty as any other platform. There isn't one singular iOS device. In fact, there are now 3 different iPads, 4 different versions of iPod Touch, 5 different iPhones, and 3 versions of Apple TV, which run a modified version of iOS. For clarity, we'll just be counting the mobile devices, which means 12 total variants of iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch. 

This means the iOS ecosystem is filled with multiple screen resolutions, screen sizes and internal hardware. And, the ecosystem is also filled with multiple software versions. If Android 1.5 and 1.6 still account for about 1% of the Android devices in the wild, it seems reasonable to assume that there are still original gen iPhones and iPod Touches out there, which aren't compatible with iOS 4 or higher. It's also safe to assume that there are iPhone 3G and 2nd gen iPod Touches in the wild, and those have limited compatibility with iOS 4 and are not compatible with iOS 5. This is something unique to iOS: you can get an update, but not all the features associated with that update. At least with Android, if you get the update, you get all the features as well. So, that means there are 4 of the 12 mobile iOS devices that are incompatible with the newest version of the operating system, which means only 66% of mobile Apple devices are even compatible with the newest OS. Sure, the same can be said about Android, but that's exactly the point: there will always be outdated devices in an ecosystem.

Of course, it's also important to remember that having a device compatible with the newest update and having that update readily available doesn't mean that everyone has updated to the newest version of the software. Apple doesn't release statistics about how many users are running what version of iOS like Google does with Android, so it makes it harder to pin down the numbers. Chitika measures iOS update rates via browser traffic, but only for the first month or so after an update release, so even this doesn't help. Regardless, the point is that updating is voluntary, and as a general rule people tend to be a bit lazy about updating. This statement is obviously not directed towards the incredibly passionate and engaged users that we get reading and commenting on our site, but the general public, many of whom don't update software with that much regularity. Additionally, there are those who have jailbroken their devices and can't update until reliable untethered jailbreaks can be made for each new OS version and hardware variation. 

So, this means the iOS ecosystem is not the unified whole that people make it out to be. There are multiple hardware setups and various software versions, just like Android. However, Apple also does something that is rarely mentioned, which makes it so that the "fragmentation" of iOS is designed to benefit developers, not users. This doesn't mean that iOS is necessarily easier or has better tools for development. We mean that Apple splits the iPhone and the iPad into two categories, where Google doesn't. 

Android does some things better for you, not developers

Apple, just like Google, has given developers the tools to make their apps work across the board on all devices, except that's not how it works in practice. Sure, all the apps made for the iPhone will work on an iPad, but it doesn't go the other way. This has lead to a phenomenon where there are often two versions of every app in the iTunes store: one for the iPad and one for the iPhone, because while iPhone apps will work on the iPad, they are lower resolution, and don't look good. Developers can make one single listing in the iTunes store for an app which will work on both iPhone and iPad, but often there will be two separate listings because the iTunes store does a good job of splitting browsing and search results into iPhone and iPad sections.

The result of this, and the reason we say that Apple's way benefits developers as compared to Google's is because with developers often having two listings in iTunes, they charge you twice for the same app if you want it on both your iPhone and iPad. This isn't always the case, for example Infinity Blade is one price and one listing for both the iPhone and iPad, but many apps or games will cost you twice, like Dead Space, which is $7 for the iPhone version and another $10 if you want it for your iPad as well. On Android, there is one listing, and thus one price. If you want Dead Space, it costs $7, and that is good for your phone and tablet. That's a big benefit for users, although maybe not so much for developers. 

Google has always pushed towards having one listing in the Google Play Store. There was a brief period where developers would have two listings on Android: one for Gingerbread and lower, and one for Honeycomb. To avoid this, Google began allowing developers to have multiple installer files on each listing, which would automatically be delivered based on the user's version. And from here on, it isn't just the same OS that will be on Android tablets and phones, but the same apps will work on all devices as well. 

App compatibility is not fragmentation

And, that leads us to the number one issue cited as a problem: developer support. Developers claim the platform is too troublesome because of device specific variations, but the reality is that it's just that developers don't think they make enough money to justify that work. This could be because of the single listing and therefore single purchase of apps, but it's really just a vicious cycle where developers don't put enough support into the ecosystem, and so the ecosystem doesn't support developers. 

This leads to the biggest cause of what some call fragmentation, but we would rather call inconsistency: developers don't make apps available to all devices. Google has done everything it can short of mandating compatibility, but developers keep apps tied to certain devices and certain OS versions. If you build an app using the API level for Gingerbread, it will work on all devices newer than Gingerbread, unless specifically excluded by the developer. The tools are there, so if there is anyone to be angry at about any fragmentation issues on Android, it is developers, because it isn't so much fragmentation as app incompatibility as dictated by the developers. Calling it "fragmentation" shifts the blame to Google, when it should really be with the developers.

Updates are not fragmentation

Just one last thing that deserved its own space before we wrap this up, since it was our opening salvo. Slow updates are not the same as fragmentation. Yes, there is a delay in Android updates because of the manufacturer and carrier layers of the update process, but let's not delude ourselves into thinking that this is the definition of fragmentation or even a part of it. As we made clear before, the availability of an update does not ensure an updated device. If it did, 100% of iPhone 3Gs, 4, 4S, iPad, iPad 2, and new iPad devices would be running iOS 5, and that simply isn't the case.

Manufacturers and carriers slow down the Android update process considerably, but there would still be multiple Android versions in the wild even with an update model similar to Apple or Microsoft. And, that model also means no uniqueness from device to device. Like it or not, if it weren't for the custom UI layer on Android, the HTC One X, the Samsung Galaxy Nexus, and Sony Xperia S would all be the same device, just with minor variations in shape and CPU. Just remember, if you don't like that about Android, there's always Windows Phone and iOS. A feature of a platform is not an insult to you, it is a choice for everyone. 

Up next

All of that said, there is something of an issue with Android that may fall under the heading of fragmentation, which is the forks made by companies like Amazon with the Kindle Fire and Barnes & Noble with the Nook Color/Tablet. The trouble with tagging that as "Android fragmentation" is that many users may not even know those platforms are Android at all. But, that's a whole different topic that we'll cover in another column either tomorrow or Monday, so please don't yell at us in the comment thread here about that issue. We'll cover it. Promise. 

134 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 22 Mar 2012, 16:41 8

1. paulyyd (Posts: 320; Member since: 08 Jan 2011)


Yawn.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 16:44 23

2. good2great (Posts: 1033; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


oh lord... this is about to be a 500+ commented post...lol

grabs popcorn and reading glasses...

"TELL EM WHY YOU'RE MAD MICHAEL!!!" HAHA

posted on 23 Mar 2012, 05:58 5

82. ayephoner (Posts: 833; Member since: 09 Jun 2009)


good write up micheal.

but, a rose by any other name.....

posted on 23 Mar 2012, 08:17 6

86. ZEUS.the.thunder.god (unregistered)


nice read as usual from Micheal but one question. why is not everybody from PA on the same page ?
there is an article by Victor H. which says
"And if we are to trust DigiTimes, Android 5.0 should make fragmentation even worse as the publication expects the new version to arrive as early as May or June. Internally, this is allegedly slowing down phone manufacturers with ICS updates as they try to prepare for 5.0."

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Phone-makers-done-tweaking-ready-to-update-to-ICS-very-soon_id28371

posted on 24 Mar 2012, 00:18 8

111. blazee (Posts: 239; Member since: 02 Jan 2012)


yea it seems like not every writer on this site is on the same page, sometimes not even the same book. Its like the knowledge amongst the writers here is "fragmented" lol

posted on 24 Mar 2012, 00:29 5

112. blazee (Posts: 239; Member since: 02 Jan 2012)


btw im not trolling, just making a joke. i love reading the articles on this site :)

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 16:52 7

3. drtech (banned) (Posts: 135; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)


I agree that there's some fragmentation on every platform. It is however much much worse on android. For example ios 5 came out in October and was imediately available for all supported iPhones. Ice cream sandwich has been out for months and is only available to a handful of devices. Im typing this on the Galaxy Tab 7.7. Brand new device and yet it's running 3.2.

Also on my ios devices apps are compatible immediately. I downloaded hulu plus to the galaxy tab and it says my device is not supported. Android definetly is a LOT more fragmented tan other platforms.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:27 28

14. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


I updated the article to respond to this. I didn't make it clear enough the first time around. I don't like the idea of calling app incompatibility "fragmentation" because that insinuates that the fault with the incompatibility lies with Google or the Android platform, which isn't the case. Hulu Plus isn't available on your Galaxy Tab or my Galaxy Nexus because of restrictions placed by the developer, not by faults in the Android system. There is nothing stopping that app from running except the will of the developer.

That is a problem, but it isn't "fragmentation". It's developers building apps with limitations.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:29 3

15. drtech (banned) (Posts: 135; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)


Why do I not have that issue on iOS? The reason can vary, but the user experience is better on iOS.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:46 23

20. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Aha, but that's not the argument. I would never claim that Android has a more seamless user experience than iOS, and I hope I haven't unintentionally insinuated that here.

The Android system alone doesn't cause these problems, so it is simply unfair to claim them as "fragmentation" problems. They are problems, but not ones that we need to target Google to fix.

Every problem with the Android platform (of which there are quite a few) can't all be thrown under the blanket of "fragmentation". There are problems with slow updates, but that isn't a fragmentation issue, it's a delay caused by manufacturers and carriers. There are problems with app compatibility, but that isn't fragmentation either, it's a problem with developers.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:57 1

28. theBankRobber (Posts: 642; Member since: 22 Sep 2011)


Your response has confused him, sorry to say but it happens ALOT when fan boys on both sides argue.

posted on 23 Mar 2012, 01:29 7

80. speckledapple (Posts: 877; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)


I think this is about the clearest explanation there can be about the issues. Our systems are based on factors that are often out of control. With Apple, the benefit for them is that they control every aspect of their ecosystem. Thus, it is easier for them to update or release something and have it supported across many devices.

However, manufacturers with their embelishments cause slow updates to their devices because they want to be different. Carriers cause slow updates because it must be optimized for their network. Google, as they are, are does not control everything and that hurts their situation. Either way, Android is a great OS but it needs all the players in it to just stop messing with it.

posted on 23 Mar 2012, 07:13 6

84. hepresearch (unregistered)


I see your point; however, if Google was to strongly take Android in hand and control it completely, like Apple does with iOS, they would no longer be providing an open-source ecosystem. Android would become just another walled-garden OS, and would no longer be as advertised. The day that Google turns to total control will be the day that Android becomes another iOS or BlackBerry.

Now, some may argue that no one really cares to have open-source any more (I hear that arguement a lot from people I know well), because no one who isn't a total nerdy/geeky techie truly bothers to develop or tweak any more... as one friend put it, "... the real tech-savvy people go to the iPhone because we are cool and have class, and because we can show our tech-savvy by choosing the best of the best, while the hopeless nerds will still cling to their custom Android garbage...", but I believe there are still folks out there who seek to be free to change things to suit them.

If I was a triangular peg, and some kid tried to squeeze me through the square hole, I would be fairly upset... it is true that iOS may be a good fit for a lot of people, but it can't be the best fit for everyone on earth. The nice thing about Android is that it can still be edited to suit a wider array of tastes and requirements than any other platform currently can, and as long as Google doesn't tighten their grip on it too much, it may remain that way... otherwise, Android will just be another pre-shaped hole in a childrens' toy to figure out how to fit the wrong pegs through...

If Google had to give up the open-source portion of Android, and control it much more strictly as many here have said they would like to see, then Android would lose its primary distinction from iOS, and would lose the ability to compete properly... in a choice between two walled-garden ecosystems, I fear that it will be the best overall performer who wins, and in the short-term that would likely end up being iOS. It could still be argued that Android would make itself into a different "shaped-hole" than iOS, but iOS is already optimized to be a good fit for the majority of people ("pegs") who have already looked for a closed-system approach. After all, this is why BlackBerry is already on its way out... it is a walled-garden system being outperformed by a newer, flashier, more universally acceptable walled-garden system in iOS.

What many people here are trying to pass off as "fragmentation" is actually Android's best property... iOS may be the clear winner in terms of stability, uniformity, consistency, and smoothness, but as long as Android continues on the path that it is on now, it will remain the clear winner in terms of customizability and near-universal acceptability. Out-of-the-box, iOS is what Apple makes it to be, but Android is whatever you can make it to be once you get it out of the box.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:23 18

41. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


ive seen plenty of app crashes on friend's iphones. dont pretend that its immune to simple programing errors.

Being immediately availible for download, and being on every device are 2 different things. When iOS is updated, it has to wait for every last user to hear about the update, and then go do it.. for every update. then you have all the minor updates in between. Thus you have users running every version of iOS all over the boards, at any time, since most dont pay attention to updates.

When google releases an update, it may take more time for a manufacturer to suite it to their needs, then pass carrier inspection, but when its released, its auto downloaded on thousands/millions of phones and the update is done.. without the individual needing to do or know anything. Thus android gets updated FASTER on the long haul.
When the HTC Amaze has an update availibe, every HTC Amaze gets it immediately (not counting staggered roll outs which only increase it by a few days). When the i4 has an update, the user must first find out about it, then go find his computer with itunes, and download it and be proactive.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:50 5

44. bonsly16 (Posts: 41; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


I would just like to simply point out that iOS devices with 5+ can receive OTA updates. I believe that many people must've updated their iPhone 4 by now and iPhone 4s are already updated.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:56 2

47. drtech (banned) (Posts: 135; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)


Thank you remix's rant was pointless since iOS 5 has OTA updates. Also remix I never said anything about apps crashing. I said I cant even use the app at all

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 20:27 14

57. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


if an app is not compatible with your android version or phone, it doesnt even show up in the marketplace. try again.

Yes, iOS5 has OTA updates. Considering only i4s gets full iOS5, and every other version of the iphone that IS ALLOWED to have iOS5, only gets a partial OS update, then only i4s's have the full iOS5.. which in itself is REAL fragmentation.

And no, I bet its still less than 35-40% of all iOS users have iOS5, because unless they bought a new i4s, they had to know about the update and then go about downloading it themselves. And yes, the "rant" is still completely viable because not every iphone has iOS5, now does it.. so the problem is nowhere near solved.

I swear, you ifanatics think just because apple released it, the whole ecosystem magically updates at once. It doesnt.. never has and it wont for a long long time to come. Apple is still selling tons of 3GS and i4 models because of how cheap they are. So until all iphone models get full iOS5, fragmentation is going to get WORSE not better.

And if your going to call one or the other fragmentation, i would say that sending out full updates to 1 device and partial updates to another is real fragmentation, since no matter what, you will NEVER have the full OS.
Android may have devices on different versions, but when they get the update, they get the full thing, not some half baked update just to say they got it, like iOS does.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 22:55 1

75. Lucas777 (Posts: 2121; Member since: 06 Jan 2011)


actually i think you are quite wrong about the updates… contrary to popular belief, ios users are not retards and can actually sign in to itunes for an update, or just go OTA…

this link shows how after just 5 days of being released, ios 5 was on a third of all iphones…

http://www.padgadget.com/2011/10/18/ios-5-already-running-on-1-in-3-idevices/

Edit: i can't get the links to work for gosh knows why… it puts some weird numbers in there that i delete but they always reappear… but u could either trust me or google it.. haha

http://www.readwriteweb.com/mobile/2012/01/more-than-66-of-users-have-upg.php

this one showws how even back in january, 66 percent of iphones were on the newest os 5.0.1… this data comes from bump, which is an older app, therefor showing a accurate update number rather than inundation of new devices number

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 22:22

72. viper5208 (Posts: 3; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


This definitely is not true. My samsung captivate needs to connect to kies in order to get 2.3. Which is complete b.s. because I can not get the right version of kies because my personal computer is a mac book pro. So basically I am stuck at 2.2 because I use a mac. So your argument that all android devices get updated automatically once it is released is simply not true either.

posted on 26 Mar 2012, 15:18 1

129. CM_Punk (banned) (Posts: 173; Member since: 13 Mar 2012)


Everything is better on iOS.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 20:00 2

53. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 819; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


I believe you wrote this based on your reply to cellphonator on the jelly bean article.

Am I right?

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 20:06

55. Penny (Posts: 986; Member since: 04 Feb 2011)


@ Michael

Honestly, the biggest factor for fragmentation in the Android platform stems from Android's strategy of being open source. Allowing multiple manufacturers to customize the OS to their specific hardware often creates incompatibilities between different devices of the same platform. I'm not saying that this is a bad strategy, but that this is the strategy chosen by Google/Android and therefore a significant portion of the blame lies with them.

I would put less blame on the developers who have to use their often limited resources to reach as many people as possible. Developing for just one Android version would be an ideal situation for a developer, but that is not the case. He would have to develop for multiple iterations of Android to reach the entire Android base, and that may be less efficient of a strategy than to just develop for the most popular version of Android and then develop for other platforms.
I think one would be headed in the wrong direction to argue that any developer would voluntarily introduce code that eliminate a portion of his/her potential user base. If anything, they would only be doing so because they had to do it to make the app work on the version of the OS they were prioritizing.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 20:51 4

60. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5482; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


yeah, Hulu has really been slacking off. look at Netflix. you can get it on any Android device. the Hulu devs really have no excuse for this.

posted on 23 Mar 2012, 09:09 1

92. hepresearch (unregistered)


Perhaps Hulu has already met its current brain-sucking needs... they need to hire more employees before they can start sucking more brains...

LOL

posted on 26 Mar 2012, 13:22

120. c.hack (Posts: 487; Member since: 09 Dec 2009)


I think the lack of updates or major delays is not entirely a fragmentation problem. While it is true that the manufacturers place their own bloatware on their phones and tablets, the reason why we don't get updates is a combination of poor support from android phone manufacturers, and their desire to make their phones unique (the fragmentation part).

This would not be a big deal if they would allow us to install the latest version for android when it comes out - unless its a Nexus they don't.

Even worse are the manufacturers that lock the bootloaders so we cannot install our own ROMs (I'm talking about you Motorola).

I have the worst example, a Droid DX2. Motorola loaded its crap motoblur on it - fragmentation. Then decided it would never provide the ICS update even though the phoe is less than a year old (poor support + fragmentation) and locked the bootloader (just plain poor)

The end result is that we pay iPhone prices for phones that are poorly supported and so locked down we cannot even update them. "Open" android is a myth.

That's why I switched to an iPhone. In many ways its more open then my DX2 will ever be. Especially if you consider it can e jailbroken.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 16:54 4

4. Toad222 (Posts: 9; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)


Every one who dislikes android because of fragmentation or has an apple product should read this article. That shows them right heh.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 16:57 4

5. PAPINYC (limited) (Posts: 2044; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


'There isn't one singular iOS device. In fact, there are now 3 different iPads, 4 different versions of iPod Touch, 5 different iPhones, and 3 versions of Apple TV, which run a modified version of iOS. For clarity, we'll just be counting the mobile devices, which means 12 total variants of iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch.
This means the iOS ecosystem is filled with multiple screen resolutions, screen sizes and internal hardware. And, the ecosystem is also filled with multiple software versions.'....

And, they all run on iFragmented WiFi !!!

posted on 26 Mar 2012, 13:26

121. c.hack (Posts: 487; Member since: 09 Dec 2009)


And yet all the iPhones and iPads made in the past 2 years got every single iOS update on the day it was released. That's better support than any Android phone.

The iOS fragmentation was planned to maximize app compatibility and developer support.

The android fragmentation was planned to maximize manufacturer and carrier profits with no concern about support for the customers. If you doubt that just call Google's customer support. lol

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:00 8

6. RazaAsad (Posts: 100; Member since: 24 Nov 2011)


@ Michael H: Very well written.
Thanks.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:01 6

7. drtech (banned) (Posts: 135; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)


Michael you can barely contain your fanboyism you really belong in the comments and not writing articles.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:04 5

8. good2great (Posts: 1033; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


yeah he sounded a little like Andro or Remix for a second...lol

i felt a lil anger coming from him...haha

"RELEASE THE DRAGON IN YOU MIKE!!!"

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:11 16

10. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


Hah! Where were you last week when I was getting called an Apple fanboy?

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:21 8

12. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5482; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


you always seem to be called either an Apple Fanboy or a Android Fanboy so i guess that would mean you've found the line to walk in between the two on...like having an unbiased attitude! whoa! there's a major plot twist for everybody. xD

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:25

13. drtech (banned) (Posts: 135; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)


I'm going to go on a limb and say you're an android user. I'm sorry, but everything from the title to the wording of this article screams fanboy.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:32 16

16. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


I am an Android user, but defending Android doesn't make someone a fanboy. I defended Apple a couple times last week, too.

The wording was stronger, because I simply don't like hypocrisy, and it got me a little riled up. Those who call out Android fragmentation never bother to mention the same issues on other platforms, and the arguments used to deride Android are not really "fragmentation" issues. It can get maddening, especially when you work in something of an echo chamber like PhoneArena.

As I teased at the end of the piece, I will be giving time to the real issue of Android fragmentation in my next piece.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:52 1

24. taz89 (Posts: 1943; Member since: 03 May 2011)


another top article,was a great read.anyone that things you are a fanboy has clearly not read any of your previous article...keep them coming :)

side not agree with nearly everything you have said.personally have never had any issues of ''fragmentation'' on my s2 i9100..i think it all depends on the device you choose which will dictate your experience.if you buy a cheap unpopular phone you are unlikely to get the same experience as a popular expensive phone although am sure google would love the experience to be the same but just dont think thats possible until the time comes when dual core is considered low end.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:15

40. drtech (banned) (Posts: 135; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)


Taz I have a brand new Galaxy Tab 7.7, just released this month. It's $499 on a 2 yr contract. I'm experiencing fragmentation. I have honeycomb 3.2 and have incompatible apps.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:52 2

46. taz89 (Posts: 1943; Member since: 03 May 2011)


tab 7.7 really dont know why its been released with honeycomb at all..samsung just f**k*d up here. i think any top tier model that is released this year should have ics minimum and the tab 7.7 is 100% a top tier device which has the buggy honeycomb. when you do get ics you will love this device,ics makes a huge difference on tablet...on the phone i dont think ics is as important as it is on the tablet.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 19:11 4

48. Whateverman (Posts: 3158; Member since: 17 May 2009)


How exactly are you "experiencing fragmentation"? Is it something you see? Although I'm running 2.3, I don't experience any fragmentation. I'm just enjoying a little Gingerbread.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 19:38

51. drtech (banned) (Posts: 135; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)


ICS was released in December. I have a tablet released in March that can't take advantage of the new software.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 22:11 3

70. Whateverman (Posts: 3158; Member since: 17 May 2009)


Many with the 3GS would they are able to take advantage of the iOS 5.0 that slowing down their devices too, but I wouldn't call that experiencing fragmentation. That's just not having the latest update.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:15 6

39. DigitalJedi_X2 (limited) (banned) (Posts: 346; Member since: 30 Jan 2012)


This is, hands down, the absolute best, unbiased article I have ever read on iPhonearena. Normally you guys are VERY pro Apple here(Victor H IMMEDIATELY comes to mind). Bravo Michael! I commend you!

Now as for drtech... You should really change your name to driOS because you are by far, the biggest iFanboy here next to Victor H and themiz. Why is that Android can be called fragmented but not iOS? This isn't the first time that iOS has been called on it's fragmentation. I forgot who it was, but someone here in the comment threads pointed out how fragmented iOS is. And of course, all of the Apple fanboy's like yourself cried foul. If you can't see how Apple is just as fragmented as everything else, then that reality distortion field is working on you overtime.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:25 5

42. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


im really starting to think its Taco50's latest user name. Im just waiting for his normal vile responces to come out, he can never hide it for long.

posted on 23 Mar 2012, 08:20

87. hepresearch (unregistered)


Loading...

posted on 23 Mar 2012, 08:24

88. hepresearch (unregistered)


Loading...

posted on 23 Mar 2012, 08:39

89. hepresearch (unregistered)


Sorry folks, my computer is slightly on the fritz...

I had commented with a few paragraphs of stuff, but then went back to edit it a little, and next thing I know I get a cross-scripting warning and my browser crashes. I come back here to try again, and discover that my post got wiped out and replaced by "Loading..."

I tried to explain, but my next comment also got wiped out and replaced by "Loading..."

I hope this one sticks. I can't take the time to re-write my original post, and probably couldn't remember enough of it to do it right anyway. I'm just letting you all know why there are two comments from me that only say "Loading..."

My browser is about to crash again. Gotta go!

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 22:08

69. protozeloz (Posts: 5326; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


he had his eyes closed :P

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:07 3

9. 9_HeLLs_oF_DrOid (Posts: 117; Member since: 02 Jan 2012)


Believe me or not, a week back I was arguing with my friend (Apple lover) on how his beloved Apple coined the term "frangmentation" for Android as they saw some potential threats from it. I used a similar argument how Apple is also "fragmented" (even if it less but still), but y'know, despite all my efforts to make him realise what I was I saying, I had to lose and call it quits!

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:13 5

11. plgladio (Posts: 311; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)


Great write up Michael, I've one doubt. Basic iPhone 3GS is running iOS 5 isn't? So what you mean "As we made clear before, the availability of an update does not ensure an updated device. If it did, 100% of iPhone 3Gs, 4, 4S, iPad, iPad 2, and new iPad devices would be running iOS 5, and that simply isn't the case."

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:34 2

17. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


A new iPhone 3Gs that you buy will come preloaded with iOS 5, but I'm talking about the ones that didn't ship with iOS 5 and require a manual update by the user.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:37

18. plgladio (Posts: 311; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)


I agree, because we would have purchased before the release. What about that.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:47 4

21. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


I'm afraid I don't understand your question.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:54

26. plgladio (Posts: 311; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)


Do you mean to say, if updates are fragmentated then all Apple should be running their latest update, just like that rather than a manual update?

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:00 3

30. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


I'm saying that fragmentation is not caused by devices not being updated. Apple devices are updated manually by the user, and not everyone updates, so not all Apple devices run the same version of iOS. Just because the update problem with Android is a delay by manufacturers doesn't make it a fragmentation problem.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 18:05

34. plgladio (Posts: 311; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)


Gotcha!

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 22:04 6

68. Sniggly (Posts: 6474; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)


Having the iPhone 3GS ship with iOS 5 is actually an issue because the damn thing is laggy and slow out of the box.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:44

19. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Too bad that majority of tech will keep embracing the terms without second thought..I wish this article reaches farther than PA audience.

Just one thing, Michael..xperia s, one x, galaxy nexus are very different hardware.
Even if they all run stock ICS, you would still have some clear choices to make.

If you want an example of basically the same product across the platform, it's windows phone - those phones all have the same UI with minimum customization available, same screen resolution, even the same processor(Qualcomm s2 8255 variants)

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:50 3

23. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


They aren't all that different hardware wise. They all have 720p screens with high quality cameras, large internal storage, etc. The only major differences are in the processors; and benchmark differences aside, real world differences in performance between those devices will be fairly limited. The real difference will be in UI.

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:49

22. ngo2dd (Posts: 773; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


I agree but android has many more variants in hardware. The other main complaint is that not all of the android will be updated. That is the main complaint of the fragment. If I buy a phone a year ago, will I even get it updated?

posted on 22 Mar 2012, 17:53 6

25. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2614; Member since: 26 May 2011)


That's why Google added the update clause to the Open Handset Alliance. Any device released after May of last year is required to be updated to the newest version or else the manufacturer won't get access to Google Apps or the Play Store.

Besides, that's what I was saying: not all iPhones can be updated to the newest version either. It's not a sign of fragmentation, but a sign of an evolving platform with old hardware that needs to be left behind.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories