FCC approves AT&T's purchase of spectrum from Qualcomm
Approval for the $1.9 billion deal might seem like a consolation prize given to AT&T after the latter had to pull out of its bid to buy T-Mobile. When AT&T withdrew its application to make the purchase from the FCC, the commission hinted at an approval for the deal with Qualcomm. And though many of AT&T's rivals and public advocacy groups were delighted with AT&T's decision not to pursue the nation's fourth largest carrier, the same organizations and competitors are not pleased with the FCC's approval of the Qualcomm deal. AT&T is not being forced to have the 700MHz spectrum it purchased work with that from Verizon or other carriers.
Having phones from rival carriers operate over the spectrum could still happen, but under the terms of the deal, AT&T would not be required to offer support and subscribers might be forced to purchase new equipment if they decide to switch carriers. The lack of compatibility might be a moot point because the FCC is planning on taking a look early next year, at requesting that LTE networks be compatible.
1. e.wvu (unregistered) posted on 22 Dec 2011, 21:56 3 0
While I am glad that AT&T decided to cancel the T-Mobile purchase, it's good that they are able to get some of the spectrum that they needed without causing a chaos that would've happen if the deal went through. The rivals just need to just deal with the result of this case even if it doesn't make them happy, at least they will be allowed a roaming agreement with AT&T, as they are required to do so. Now that this is over, the rivals/competitors just need to move on and focus on more important issues than other networks and focus on their own company needs.
2. tedkord posted on 22 Dec 2011, 22:19 2 1
I sure hope ATT are happy with their consolidation prize.
Seriously, PA...how much could a proofreader cost?
3. dman5400 posted on 22 Dec 2011, 23:56 2 0
I was gonna say something, but didn't know how to without sounding like a d%¢k lol
4. theoak posted on 23 Dec 2011, 08:51 1 0
Consolation prize? They have to pay a 6 billion break up fee ... and now 2 billion for this deal. As noted also ... AT&T must allow other carriers to roam ... so this is not exclusive bandwidth either.
5. e.wvu (unregistered) posted on 23 Dec 2011, 13:04 1 0
It was actually a $4 billion break-up fee. But spending $6 billion is better than spending $39 billion for the network's needs in spectrum.
6. Forsaken77 posted on 23 Dec 2011, 16:23 1 0
You're wrong... it is exclusive bandwidth. AT&T will allow other carriers to roam for a fee. Did you ever make roaming phone calls and see how damn expensive it is? Most people won't do it unless it's an emergency. All carriers have this agreement. It's standard practice. Most carriers roam on Verizon though because they cover the most area.