Pictures found on Google Plus hint at Samsung Galaxy Camera sequel with 20.2MP shooter
The Samsung Galaxy Camera belongs to a group of devices known as connected cameras. These are cameras with Wi-Fi or cellular connectivity that can upload pictures to your social networks or the cloud. The Samsung Galaxy Camera is available as a Wi-Fi only model and there is also a version with 3G connectivity. And while there is no guarantee that Samsung will announce the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, considering the leaked photos, who knows? Perhaps this will be a surprise unveiling at the June 20th Samsung Premiere event.
Goolge Plus pictures taken with the EK-GN120 Fullscreen
More popular slideshows
iOS 7 release date and time are today (Sep 18), get ready to update!
18 Sep 2013, 04:00
HTC One 2 aka HTC M8 rumor round-up: camera, specs, release date and design
05 Dec 2013, 10:44
Cyber Monday 2013 deals on phones, tablets and other electronics
01 Dec 2013, 10:55
Samsung Galaxy S5 rumor round-up: release date, price and specs
03 Dec 2013, 05:54
How to take better photos with your Samsung Galaxy Note 3
05 Dec 2013, 03:02
Android 4.4 KitKat update: release date, features and rumors
31 Oct 2013, 02:31
Nexus 5 huge camera ring actually holds a magnet for add-on lenses
05 Dec 2013, 09:51
Goolge Plus pictures taken with the EK-GN120
source: TechTastic via AndroidAuthority
1. TheBitterrTruth (unregistered)
Not bad. Price should be right, Galaxy Camera was too expensive.
2. TheBitterrTruth (unregistered)
They should change their name now. There are too many Galaxy devices out there. Bring something new Sammy. Specially the design.
3. protozeloz (Posts: 5189; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
I agree with so many galaxy they might burn the name too fast
I was thinking they need to toss another name for their cameras and some of its low end phones
7. Antonyjoseph (Posts: 169; Member since: 06 Apr 2013)
Samsung cameras are not worth it. For the same price you can pick up a Nikon/ Canon DSLR.Otherwise samsing should bundle their galaxy cameras with phone capability.
8. JMartin22 (Posts: 400; Member since: 30 Apr 2013)
16 MP was enough. The problem was, for it marketed as a dedicated camera, it still only used the same imaging module as the iPhone 4S at the time. Which made it bad, considering what it was marketed as and the price tag. They need to concentrate on camera optic quality this time.
9. Loubielou (Posts: 115; Member since: 11 Jul 2012)
Samsung better start making jeans an trousers for these phones,as they are going to Bulky for normal clothes,o.k it might be a good idea with the focus lens,but the weight of these phones will put alot of people off from buying these phones
10. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
yeah...and andro/sammyboys claim that Nokia's device are thick and ugly..look at this monstrosity.
It's not even a phone. It's a camera with a phone functionality.