Not bad. Price should be right, Galaxy Camera was too expensive.
They should change their name now. There are too many Galaxy devices out there. Bring something new Sammy. Specially the design.
(Posts: 5387; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
I agree with so many galaxy they might burn the name too fast
I was thinking they need to toss another name for their cameras and some of its low end phones
(Posts: 1608; Member since: 07 Jun 2013)
pics looks so blurry haha!
(Posts: 682; Member since: 03 Mar 2013)
Mehhh 808 PV still better.
(Posts: 216; Member since: 06 Apr 2013)
Samsung cameras are not worth it. For the same price you can pick up a Nikon/ Canon DSLR.Otherwise samsing should bundle their galaxy cameras with phone capability.
(Posts: 1607; Member since: 30 Apr 2013)
16 MP was enough. The problem was, for it marketed as a dedicated camera, it still only used the same imaging module as the iPhone 4S at the time. Which made it bad, considering what it was marketed as and the price tag. They need to concentrate on camera optic quality this time.
(Posts: 381; Member since: 11 Jul 2012)
Samsung better start making jeans an trousers for these phones,as they are going to Bulky for normal clothes,o.k it might be a good idea with the focus lens,but the weight of these phones will put alot of people off from buying these phones
(Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
yeah...and andro/sammyboys claim that Nokia's device are thick and ugly..look at this monstrosity.
It's not even a phone. It's a camera with a phone functionality.
Pictures found on Google Plus hint at Samsung Galaxy Camera sequel with 20.2MP shooter